Evaluation of the Accelerated Traction of Impacted Canines in Terms of Speed and Changes in the Dental Arches

NCT ID: NCT05891665

Last Updated: 2023-06-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-15

Study Completion Date

2023-03-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The time required for orthodontic traction of impacted canines after surgical exposure is a particularly troubling clinical problem because it prolongs the orthodontic treatment duration. During traction process, several complications could result in alveolar bone loss, root resorption of the adjacent teeth, ankylosis, discoloration, loss or vitality and gingival recession. Accordingly, and due to the lack of studies concerned with accelerating the traction movement of the impacted canines, we conducted this study to evaluate the effectiveness of some surgical interventions (corticotomy and Piezocision) in increasing the rate of orthodontic traction movement. We also aimed to evaluate dentoalveolar changes associated with the use of such accelerating procedures compared with the conventional traction method.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Adult patients with unilateral palatally impacted canines will be included in this study. One of patient groups will be treated using fixed orthodontic appliances in combination with some accelerated surgical interventions, while the second patient group will be treated using the traditional treatment method. The velocity of traction movement will be assessed in the two groups. The differences between the two groups in terms of the total treatment duration and the traction duration will be evaluated.

Dentoalveolar changes associated with the use of such accelerating procedures will be assessed by several variables studied on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. In this study, two groups are going to be evaluated: (1) patients treated in the traditional manner, (2) patients will undergo corticotomy-assisted traction of the impacted canines.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Impacted Tooth With Abnormal Positioning

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients treated with the acceleration method

Patients will be treated using fixed orthodontic appliances assisted by minimally-invasive corticotomy (osteoperforations and piezocision) to accelerate impacted canines' traction after levelling and aligning the upper dental arch and opening an appropriate distance.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Corticotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A corticotomy procedure will be applied with some osteoperforations during the surgical exposure of the impacted canine. Then this will be followed after 8 weeks with another surgical stimulation using piezosurgery.

Patients treated with the traditional traction technique

Patients will be treated using the fixed orthodontic appliances to track the palatally impacted canines after levelling and aligning the upper dental arch and opening an appropriate space to receive the impacted canine.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Traditional traction of the impacted canine without corticotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In this group of patients, the traction of the impacted canine will be performed traditionally without the involvement of additional surgical intervention.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Corticotomy

A corticotomy procedure will be applied with some osteoperforations during the surgical exposure of the impacted canine. Then this will be followed after 8 weeks with another surgical stimulation using piezosurgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Traditional traction of the impacted canine without corticotomy

In this group of patients, the traction of the impacted canine will be performed traditionally without the involvement of additional surgical intervention.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients aged 18 to 28.
2. Unilateral palatally or mid-alveolar upper impacted canine.
3. The impacted canine crown not exceeding the middle of the lateral incisor root.
4. Absence of root resorption of the lateral incisors.
5. No contact between the canine crown and the lateral incisor root.
6. Individuals not previously receiving orthodontic treatment.
7. No use of any medications that may affect the orthodontic movement.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Bilateral or buccal canine impaction cases.
2. More than 45-degree angle between the canine's longitudinal axis and the vertical facial plane.
3. Any medical condition that prevents oral surgery.
4. Oral structural abnormality that is inherited or congenital.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

28 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Damascus University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mahran R. Mousa, DDS MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

PhD student at the Department of Orthodontics

Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Professor of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus

Omar Heshmeh, DDS MSc PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School

Damascus, , Syria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Syria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Al-Ibrahim HM, Hajeer MY, Alkhouri I, Zinah E. Leveling and alignment time and the periodontal status in patients with severe upper crowding treated by corticotomy-assisted self-ligating brackets in comparison with conventional or self-ligating brackets only: a 3-arm randomized controlled clinical trial. J World Fed Orthod. 2022 Feb;11(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Oct 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34688577 (View on PubMed)

Becker A, Chaushu S. Success rate and duration of orthodontic treatment for adult patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Nov;124(5):509-14. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00578-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14614417 (View on PubMed)

Becker A, Kohavi D, Zilberman Y. Periodontal status following the alignment of palatally impacted canine teeth. Am J Orthod. 1983 Oct;84(4):332-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9416(83)90349-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6578683 (View on PubMed)

Smailiene D, Kavaliauskiene A, Pacauskiene I, Zasciurinskiene E, Bjerklin K. Palatally impacted maxillary canines: choice of surgical-orthodontic treatment method does not influence post-treatment periodontal status. A controlled prospective study. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Dec;35(6):803-10. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs102. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23349422 (View on PubMed)

Fischer TJ. Orthodontic treatment acceleration with corticotomy-assisted exposure of palatally impacted canines. Angle Orthod. 2007 May;77(3):417-20. doi: 10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0417:OTAWCE]2.0.CO;2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17465647 (View on PubMed)

Mousa MR, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Heshmeh O. The Effectiveness of Conventional and Accelerated Methods of Orthodontic Traction and Alignment of Palatally Impacted Canines in Terms of Treatment Time, Velocity of Tooth Movement, Periodontal, and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2022 May 10;14(5):e24888. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24888. eCollection 2022 May.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35572459 (View on PubMed)

Parkin NA, Almutairi S, Benson PE. Surgical exposure and orthodontic alignment of palatally displaced canines: can we shorten treatment time? J Orthod. 2019 Jun;46(1_suppl):54-59. doi: 10.1177/1465312519841384. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31056030 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UDDS-Ortho-10-2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.