Comparison Between Two Methods in the Acceleration of the Retraction of Upper Canines
NCT ID: NCT03659188
Last Updated: 2023-03-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
51 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-09-02
2020-08-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Then, initial diagnostic records (diagnostic gypsum models, internal and external oral photographs, as well as radiographic images) will be studied to ensure that the selection criteria are accurately matched.
The aim of this study is to compare flapless bone cutting by mechanical drills to evaluate the acceleration of the retraction of upper canines versus traditional bone cutting by piezo-surgery in comparison with a control group without bone cutting after extraction of upper first premolars in class II type I patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Accelerated Traction of Impacted Canines in Terms of Speed and Changes in the Dental Arches
NCT05891665
Evaluation of the Periodontal Status After the Treatment of Palatally Impacted Canines Using Acceleration Procedures
NCT05644678
Dental Changes Following the Traction of Impacted Maxillary Canines
NCT07294378
The Effect of Surgical Interventions to Assist Orthodontic Movement of Impacted Maxillary Canines
NCT03678805
The Use of Corticotomy for Upper Incisors Retraction
NCT03149016
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cortico-alveolar perforations
Patients will undergo orthodontic treatment plus cortico-alveolar perforations.
Cortico-alveolar perforations
Mechanical drills will be used on a handpiece
Traditional Corticotomy
Patients will undergo orthodontic treatment plus an acceleration procedure employing traditional corticotomy.
Traditional Corticotomy
Piezo-surgery will be employed following flaps' elevation.
Control
Patients will undergo orthodontic treatment in which canine retraction will be accomplished using the standard sliding mechanism without any acceleration procedures.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cortico-alveolar perforations
Mechanical drills will be used on a handpiece
Traditional Corticotomy
Piezo-surgery will be employed following flaps' elevation.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who have malocclusion class II type I and who require first-premolar extraction with:
* Dentoalveolar class II type I with ANB between 5 and 9 degrees.
* Protrusion between (5-10 mm)
* Overbite between (0-4)
* Vertical dimension is normal or over the normal range
* Mild to moderate crowding
* All patients should have complete permanent occlusion on the maxilla
* All patients should have normal periodontal tissue and good oral health, which will be assessed by:
1. Depth of the gingival pocket does not exceed 4 mm
2. Plaque index does not exceed 1
3. Gingival index does not exceed 1
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have a general health problem that affects dental movement
* Patients who have undergone previous orthodontic treatment
* Patients with mixed occlusion
* Patients who have lost one or more of their teeth since birth or who have one of the permanent teeth extracted (except the third molar)
* Patients who have bad oral health or active periodontal disease
18 Years
27 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Damascus University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mohammad Al-Bitar, DDS MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MSc student at the Orthodontic Department, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria
Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Associate Professor of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria
Bassel Brad, DDS MSc PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, SYRIA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Orthodontic Department, University of Damascus Dental School
Damascus, , Syria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abbas NH, Sabet NE, Hassan IT. Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Apr;149(4):473-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.029.
Alfawal AM, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Hamadah O, Brad B. Effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the acceleration of tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0146-9. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, Sangsuwon C, Lee YB, Alyami B, Corpodian C, Barrera LM, Alansari S, Khoo E, Teixeira C. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Nov;144(5):639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.06.017.
Aksakalli S, Calik B, Kara B, Ezirganli S. Accelerated tooth movement with piezocision and its periodontal-transversal effects in patients with Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2016 Jan;86(1):59-65. doi: 10.2319/012215-49.1. Epub 2015 May 19.
Buyuk SK, Yavuz MC, Genc E, Sunar O. A novel method to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement. Saudi Med J. 2018 Feb;39(2):203-208. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.2.21235.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UDDS-Ortho-18-2018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.