Comparison Between Two Methods in the Acceleration of the Retraction of Upper Canines

NCT ID: NCT03659188

Last Updated: 2023-03-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

51 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-02

Study Completion Date

2020-08-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients at the Orthodontic Department of University of Damascus Dental School will be examined and subjects who meet the inclusion criteria will be included.

Then, initial diagnostic records (diagnostic gypsum models, internal and external oral photographs, as well as radiographic images) will be studied to ensure that the selection criteria are accurately matched.

The aim of this study is to compare flapless bone cutting by mechanical drills to evaluate the acceleration of the retraction of upper canines versus traditional bone cutting by piezo-surgery in comparison with a control group without bone cutting after extraction of upper first premolars in class II type I patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cortico-alveolar perforations

Patients will undergo orthodontic treatment plus cortico-alveolar perforations.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cortico-alveolar perforations

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Mechanical drills will be used on a handpiece

Traditional Corticotomy

Patients will undergo orthodontic treatment plus an acceleration procedure employing traditional corticotomy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Traditional Corticotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Piezo-surgery will be employed following flaps' elevation.

Control

Patients will undergo orthodontic treatment in which canine retraction will be accomplished using the standard sliding mechanism without any acceleration procedures.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cortico-alveolar perforations

Mechanical drills will be used on a handpiece

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Traditional Corticotomy

Piezo-surgery will be employed following flaps' elevation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Flapless corticotomy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 18-27 years
* Patients who have malocclusion class II type I and who require first-premolar extraction with:
* Dentoalveolar class II type I with ANB between 5 and 9 degrees.
* Protrusion between (5-10 mm)
* Overbite between (0-4)
* Vertical dimension is normal or over the normal range
* Mild to moderate crowding
* All patients should have complete permanent occlusion on the maxilla
* All patients should have normal periodontal tissue and good oral health, which will be assessed by:

1. Depth of the gingival pocket does not exceed 4 mm
2. Plaque index does not exceed 1
3. Gingival index does not exceed 1

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients in which oral surgery under local anesthesia is contraindicated due to medical, psychological, or social reasons.
* Patients who have a general health problem that affects dental movement
* Patients who have undergone previous orthodontic treatment
* Patients with mixed occlusion
* Patients who have lost one or more of their teeth since birth or who have one of the permanent teeth extracted (except the third molar)
* Patients who have bad oral health or active periodontal disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

27 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Damascus University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohammad Al-Bitar, DDS MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MSc student at the Orthodontic Department, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria

Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Associate Professor of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria

Bassel Brad, DDS MSc PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, SYRIA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Orthodontic Department, University of Damascus Dental School

Damascus, , Syria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Syria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abbas NH, Sabet NE, Hassan IT. Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Apr;149(4):473-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.029.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27021451 (View on PubMed)

Alfawal AM, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Hamadah O, Brad B. Effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the acceleration of tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0146-9. Epub 2016 Oct 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27696311 (View on PubMed)

Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, Sangsuwon C, Lee YB, Alyami B, Corpodian C, Barrera LM, Alansari S, Khoo E, Teixeira C. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Nov;144(5):639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.06.017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24182579 (View on PubMed)

Aksakalli S, Calik B, Kara B, Ezirganli S. Accelerated tooth movement with piezocision and its periodontal-transversal effects in patients with Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2016 Jan;86(1):59-65. doi: 10.2319/012215-49.1. Epub 2015 May 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25989211 (View on PubMed)

Buyuk SK, Yavuz MC, Genc E, Sunar O. A novel method to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement. Saudi Med J. 2018 Feb;39(2):203-208. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.2.21235.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29436571 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UDDS-Ortho-18-2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.