The Use of Corticotomy for Upper Incisors Retraction

NCT ID: NCT03149016

Last Updated: 2018-07-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-20

Study Completion Date

2018-04-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We aim to assess the treatment outcomes following upper incisors retraction accelerated by corticotomy procedure. So, we intend to randomize orthodontic patients with class II division I malocclusion into two groups: experimental group and control group. Both groups will start orthodontic treatment. Once a 0.019\*0.025-inch stainless steel wire is fully engaged to the brackets, 1st premolars will be extracted. Canines will be retracted in the conventional manner. Then, the actual evaluation period starts when the upper incisors are retracted using two different methods.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the last three decades, the number of adult patients seeking short orthodontic treatment time has apparently increased as the conventional orthodontic treatment usually lasts for 20-24 months. Furthermore, orthodontic treatment is often associated with root resorption, bone degradation and caries development. Patients nowadays desire to end the orthodontic treatment as soon as possible due to phsycosocial reasons and to get the goals of the treatment without affecting their social life .

So many tooth movement accelerating methods have been proposed. However, the surgical approached are considered the most effective and promising methods in accelerating tooth movement. The current research aims to evaluate the efficacy of the a new proposed surgical method compared to the conventional method in upper incisors' retraction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Corticotomy-assisted Retraction

Corticotomy-assisted retraction will be performed in order to help in accelerating upper incisors' retraction

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Corticotomy-assisted Retraction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Using a tunneling technique, the researcher will perform the intervention in the alveolar bone surrounding the upper incisors before retraction.

Conventional Retraction

Conventional retraction will be used in this group of patients by sliding mechanisms

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Corticotomy-assisted Retraction

Using a tunneling technique, the researcher will perform the intervention in the alveolar bone surrounding the upper incisors before retraction.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients 15 to 27 years , with permanent dentition , without hypodontia .
* Overjet less than 10 mm
* Normal or increased growth pattern (Diagnosed by Y-axis angle)
* Mild to moderate crowding (Less than 3 mm)
* After canines retraction , at least 3 mm space should be available distal the lateral incisors
* Midline deviation shouldn't be more than 3 mm

Exclusion Criteria

* Medically contraindicated patients to oral surgery .
* Existence of general health issue that affect orthodontic teeth movement
* Previous orthodontic treatment
* Mixed dentition
* Hypodontia (Except third molars)
* Bad oral hygiene
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

27 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Damascus University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ghaith Al Imam, DDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MSc student in Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School

Damascus, , Syria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Syria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Aboul-Ela SM, El-Beialy AR, El-Sayed KM, Selim EM, El-Mangoury NH, Mostafa YA. Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Feb;139(2):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.028.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21300255 (View on PubMed)

Al-Naoum F, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A. Does alveolar corticotomy accelerate orthodontic tooth movement when retracting upper canines? A split-mouth design randomized controlled trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;72(10):1880-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25128922 (View on PubMed)

Choo H, Heo HA, Yoon HJ, Chung KR, Kim SH. Treatment outcome analysis of speedy surgical orthodontics for adults with maxillary protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec;140(6):e251-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.029.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22133959 (View on PubMed)

Chung KR, Kim SH, Lee BS. Speedy surgical-orthodontic treatment with temporary anchorage devices as an alternative to orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jun;135(6):787-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.036.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19524840 (View on PubMed)

Bhattacharya P, Bhattacharya H, Anjum A, Bhandari R, Agarwal DK, Gupta A, Ansar J. Assessment of Corticotomy Facilitated Tooth Movement and Changes in Alveolar Bone Thickness - A CT Scan Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Oct;8(10):ZC26-30. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9448.4954. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25478442 (View on PubMed)

Dincer M, Gulsen A, Turk T. The retraction of upper incisors with the PG retraction system. Eur J Orthod. 2000 Feb;22(1):33-41. doi: 10.1093/ejo/22.1.33.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10721243 (View on PubMed)

KOLE H. Surgical operations on the alveolar ridge to correct occlusal abnormalities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1959 May;12(5):515-29 concl. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(59)90153-7. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 13644913 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UDDS-Ortho-02-2017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.