Effects of Mini Implant Facilitated Micro-osteoperforations on the Alignment of Mandibular Anterior Crowding
NCT ID: NCT04778241
Last Updated: 2021-04-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-06-01
2021-03-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Leveling and Alignment of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Assisted With MOPs :A Comparative Clinical Study
NCT05605652
Micro-osteoperforations and Tooth Movement
NCT02473471
Evaluating the Efficacy of Micro-Osteoperforations Technique on the Orthodontic Tooth Movement Acceleration in Moderate Mandibular Anterior Crowding Cases Treated With Clear Aligners
NCT05492773
Effects of Micro-osteoperforations on Lower Anterior Crowding Using Clear Aligners
NCT07169968
Evaluation of Two Approaches of Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) During Orthodontic Canine Retraction
NCT04868721
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Subjects and Methods: Orthodontic patients aged 17-25 years old, non-extraction treatment with lower anterior crowding of 4-6 mm using Little's irregularity index. Outcome measures included the amount of crowding using Little's irregularity index (LII), apical root resorption, and pain perception. The effectiveness of alignment will be tested using t-test, while root resorption and pain perception will be tested by the Mann-Whitney U test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P\<0.05).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Micro-Osteoperforation group
All the participants bonded by the care provider with 0.022 inch MBT prescription appliance (Ortho TechanologyTM,USA). Mini-implant facilitated micro-osteoperforation (MOPs) were placed in the experimental group before placing the initial leveling arch wire. MOPs were placed at three sites i.e., interproximally between mandibular canine and lateral incisor on both sides and between central incisors in the midline on labial aspect of mandible.
Micro-osteoperforation
Mini-implant facilitated micro-osteoperforation (MOPs) were placed in the experimental group before placing the initial leveling arch wire. MOPs were placed at three sites i.e., interproximally between mandibular canine and lateral incisor on both sides and between central incisors in the midline on labial aspect of mandible.
Control group
All the participants in this group bonded by the principal investigator with 0.022-inch slot MBT prescription appliance (Ortho TechanologyTM,USA). No micro-osteoperforation was used in this group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Micro-osteoperforation
Mini-implant facilitated micro-osteoperforation (MOPs) were placed in the experimental group before placing the initial leveling arch wire. MOPs were placed at three sites i.e., interproximally between mandibular canine and lateral incisor on both sides and between central incisors in the midline on labial aspect of mandible.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Non-extraction treatment in the mandibular arch
3. Presence of full complement of dentition from first molar to first molar
4. Mandibular anterior irregularity index between 4-6 mm
5. Patient with healthy periodontium and no attachment loss of \>2 mm
Exclusion Criteria
2. Presence of primary or missing permanent teeth in the mandibular anterior area
3. Medical problems that affect tooth movement.
17 Years
25 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Baghdad
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mushriq F. Abid
Assistant professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mushriq Abid, MSc, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Baghdad
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
College of Dentisry-University of Baghdad
Baghdad, , Iraq
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Al-Attar A, Nissan L, Almuzian M, Abid M. Effect of mini-implant facilitated micro-osteoperforations on the alignment of mandibular anterior crowding: A randomised controlled clinical trial. J Orthod. 2022 Dec;49(4):379-387. doi: 10.1177/14653125221099038. Epub 2022 May 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MOP76
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.