Effect of Protein Quality During Overreaching in Trained Cyclists

NCT ID: NCT03994198

Last Updated: 2019-06-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

11 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-01

Study Completion Date

2018-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Athletes frequently undertake periods of intensified training commonly referred to as "overreaching." These training periods acutely decrease performance, with the expectation that performance will rebound and improve after a short recovery. Yet, overreaching does not always improve performance and may be a precursor to overtraining syndrome, a long-term decrement in performance. A nutritional intervention focused on the adoption of 'best practices' for protein feeding (optimal timing, dose, and quality) could help reduce the stress of overreaching, reduce the likelihood of developing overtraining syndrome, and augment adaptations to intensified exercise. While the nutrition study is our main interest, the investigators first want to validate the measurement of exercise performance. Accordingly, this project consists of two related studies: (1) the assessment of short time trials for reliability and validity; and (2) the assessment of optimal protein feeding to decrease the stress of overreaching and improve outcomes following training.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Endurance-trained athletes frequently undergo periods of overreaching (increased training loads) to improve performance. In study 1, the investigators will determine whether 4-min and 20-min time trials are repeatable and whether they (individually or collectively) relate to 1-hour time trial performance. For Study 2, the investigators propose that proper nutrition (with a focus on the dose, timing, and quality of protein) can help mitigate the stress of overreaching, which will improve performance. Thus, the investigators will compare the effects of two diets that differ in terms of protein servings (dose, timing, quality). In Study 2, skeletal muscle biopsies will be collected to determine how dietary protein intervention impacts the quality and quantity of skeletal muscle mitochondria in response to intense training.

For study 1, the objective is to determine the reliability and validity of 4-min and 20-min time trial performance (mean power output).

For study 2, the objective is to (1) determine whether following an optimal protein diet during a period of intense training will, relative to a typical diet: (1) improve measures of exercise performance, (2) improve sleep quality, psychological wellbeing, and immune function, (3) improve the quality and quantity of skeletal muscle mitochondria.

Study 1 is a reliability and validity experiment designed to assess the key outcome measure in study 2.

Study 2 is a randomized, crossover study. Participants will, in a randomized order, complete both conditions, separated by a 4-day washout period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Muscle Protein Synthesis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Randomized cross-over design
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Participants and the investigators will be blinded the the supplement type, only the LPI will have the codes to decipher the supplement type. Supplements are referred to as A and B.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Alpha-lactalbumin

Participants will consume 60 g of alphalactalbumin (fraction of whey protein) for 3 training days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alpha-lactalbumin

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

A protein fraction of whey protein, higher in tryptophan

Collagen peptides

Participants will consume 60 g of collagen peptides for 3 training days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Collagen peptides

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Collagen peptides from bovine sources

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Alpha-lactalbumin

A protein fraction of whey protein, higher in tryptophan

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Collagen peptides

Collagen peptides from bovine sources

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* non-smokers
* non-diabetic
* Participants had to be training regularly (performing aerobic exercise at least 4 times per week, including regular cycling exercise)
* Generally healthy

Exclusion Criteria

* consuming excessive alcohol (\>21 units per week)
* use of an investigational drug or nutraceutical in the previous 30 days
* dairy allergy
* history of significant loss or gain of body mass in the past 6 months (\>2kg)
* regular use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
* infectious disease, and/or the presence of any relevant disease (e.g., gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, neuromuscular, etc.).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

McMaster University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stuart Phillips

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stuart Phillips, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

McMaster University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ivor Wynne Centre

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HIREB 3036

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Protein Supplements to Cyclists
NCT03136133 UNKNOWN NA