Effects of a Cognitive Rehabilitation Program: a Neurocognitive Study
NCT ID: NCT02201888
Last Updated: 2014-07-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
130 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-01-31
2014-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Brain Image Markers Associated With Cognitive Training and Aerobic Exercise in Schizophrenia
NCT03509597
Cognitive Rehabilitation in Schizophrenia
NCT00248794
Computer Assisted Cognitive Remediation Program in Schizophrenia
NCT01598220
Computerized Cognitive Training for Schizophrenia in Brazil
NCT02591498
Specific Cognitive Remediation for Schizophrenia
NCT01607424
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Computer-assisted cognitive training
Patients in this arm of the trial carried out computerized online training drawn from the Feskits program (www.feskits.com), chosen to have attention, memory and executive function components. Specifically the sessions included the following exercises: sustained attention (4 minutes), attention/perception (5 minutes), working memory (8 minutes), auditory and visual memory (8 minutes), executive function (10 minutes), language (6 minutes), and games (4 minutes).
Computer-assisted cognitive training
Treatment lasted six months. The CRT and CC conditions consisted of biweekly sessions of 45 minutes. Patients in both conditions trained in groups of up to 8, supervised by a single person. The CRT and CC groups were scheduled at different times. The same personnel supervised both treatment conditions. All supervisors were trained by the coordinator of the study in the technical management of the two conditions.
Computerized active condition
Patients allocated to this condition completed the same number of sessions as the cognitive training group but followed a computerized typing program (www.rapidtyping.com). This had similar design characteristics to the CRT condition, in that it was hierarchically organized with exercise level of difficulty being adjusted to the individual's level of performance and feedback being given at the end of each exercise. Additionally, patients in this condition played computerized games requiring typing (crosswords, word puzzles, etc) and were taught basic internet navigation by a supervisor. Exposure to the computer was of equivalent duration to the CRT condition.
Computerized active condition
Treatment lasted six months. The CRT and CC conditions consisted of biweekly sessions of 45 minutes. Patients in both conditions trained in groups of up to 8, supervised by a single person. The CRT and CC groups were scheduled at different times. The same personnel supervised both treatment conditions. All supervisors were trained by the coordinator of the study in the technical management of the two conditions.
Treatment as usual
Patients in this condition participated in their (individually variable) daily rehabilitative activities. Patients allocated to the other two conditions also participated in these activities
Treatment as usual (TAU)
TAU: Patients in this condition participated in their (individually variable) daily rehabilitative activities. Patients allocated to the other two conditions also participated in these activities.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Computer-assisted cognitive training
Treatment lasted six months. The CRT and CC conditions consisted of biweekly sessions of 45 minutes. Patients in both conditions trained in groups of up to 8, supervised by a single person. The CRT and CC groups were scheduled at different times. The same personnel supervised both treatment conditions. All supervisors were trained by the coordinator of the study in the technical management of the two conditions.
Computerized active condition
Treatment lasted six months. The CRT and CC conditions consisted of biweekly sessions of 45 minutes. Patients in both conditions trained in groups of up to 8, supervised by a single person. The CRT and CC groups were scheduled at different times. The same personnel supervised both treatment conditions. All supervisors were trained by the coordinator of the study in the technical management of the two conditions.
Treatment as usual (TAU)
TAU: Patients in this condition participated in their (individually variable) daily rehabilitative activities. Patients allocated to the other two conditions also participated in these activities.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* estimated premorbid intelligence quotient (IQ) in the normal range
* chronic illness (i.e. duration ≥two years)
* relative clinical stability (i.e. the patients had not experienced any recent exacerbation of symptoms).
Exclusion Criteria
* alcohol or substance abuse/dependence within the previous six months.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
OTHER_GOV
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental
NETWORK
Hermanas Hospitalarias del Sagrado Corazón de Jesús, Spain
UNKNOWN
Salvador Sarró, MD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Salvador Sarró, MD
Chief administrator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter J McKenna, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries Research Foundation
Jesus J Gomar, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries Research Foundation
Edith Pomarol-Clotet, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries Research Foundation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries Research Foundation
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PI09/90483
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
PR-2009-15
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.