Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia: Efficacy and Role of Neuroplasticity in "Top-down" and "Bottom-up" Mechanisms
NCT ID: NCT06482918
Last Updated: 2024-07-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
160 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-30
2026-03-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cognitive Remediation Therapy and Schizophrenia
NCT01078129
Optimizing Cognitive Remediation Outcomes in Schizophrenia
NCT02105779
Cognitive Remediation of Schizophrenia in a Community Mental Health Setting
NCT01988714
Cost-utility Study of a Group of Compensatory Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia
NCT02879604
Cognitive Remediation in Early Phase Psychosis
NCT01546467
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study addresses in parallel two research questions, one of clinical interest, and another focused on the psychological / neurobiological mechanisms of neurocognitive remediation: What neurocognitive remediation strategy, executive skills training ("top-down" approach) or training perceptual approach ("bottom-up" approach), is it effective in improving neurocognitive performance? Which neurocognitive remediation strategies are related to changes in BDNF levels? At what point of the recovery process are these changes observed? The hypothesis is that the "bottom-up" strategy presents observable results at the end of the intervention, whereas the "top-down" strategy results in an observable effect on neurocognitive performance and functioning in the community in a delayed manner, 12 weeks after the intervention. We expect that both strategies will be associated with an increase in BDNF levels compared to the situation prior to the intervention, but that this will occur at the time when the clinical effect is observed. The specific objectives are: (1) Evaluate the effectiveness of two cognitive remediation strategies, one focused on executive skills training (top-down approach) and another on perceptual training (bottom-up approach). (2) Study the critical moments of neuroplasticity for each cognitive remediation strategy, observing changes in BDNF levels at the end of the intervention and 12 weeks after the intervention. (3) Identify potential clinical and/or molecular predictors (BDNF levels or val66met polymorphism) of the response to treatment from the neurocognitive point of view for each cognitive remediation strategy.
In order to achieve this, two randomized controlled trials with two arms will be carried out in parallel, one where patients will receive cognitive remediation and another consisting of a control group (with usual treatment). The control group subjects will remain on a waiting and observation list for 10 weeks, to later enter the active arm, which will also last 10 weeks. In one of the trials the active arm will consist of cognitive remediation therapy with a "bottom-up" approach (focused on perceptual training), while in the other trial the active arm will consist of cognitive remediation with a "top-down" approach (focused on executive skills training). Neurocognitive and clinical assessments will be carried out along with the measurement of BDNF levels at four measurement times: one at baseline, one at the end of the observation period with treatment-as-usual, another at the end of cognitive remediation, and another after a 12 weeks follow-up period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Top-Down Cognitive Remediation
Executive functions training
Cognitive Remediation
Computer-assisted top-down or bottom-up cognitive remediation using tablets
Bottom-Up Cognitive Remediation
Perceptual training
Cognitive Remediation
Computer-assisted top-down or bottom-up cognitive remediation using tablets
Treatment-As-Usual
Treatment as usual
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cognitive Remediation
Computer-assisted top-down or bottom-up cognitive remediation using tablets
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 18 and 59 years
* Clinically stable outpatients
* Current treatment with at least one antipsychotic medication
Exclusion Criteria
* Substance use disorder with illegal drugs in active use
* Participation in a cognitive remediation program in the last 6 months
18 Years
59 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Chile
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
RODRIGO NIETO
MD PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rodrigo R. Nieto, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Chile
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinica Psiquiatrica Universitaria, Hospital Clinico de la Universidad de Chile
Santiago, RM, Chile
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Owen MJ, Sawa A, Mortensen PB. Schizophrenia. Lancet. 2016 Jul 2;388(10039):86-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01121-6. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
Kahn RS, Sommer IE, Murray RM, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Weinberger DR, Cannon TD, O'Donovan M, Correll CU, Kane JM, van Os J, Insel TR. Schizophrenia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015 Nov 12;1:15067. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.67.
Schaefer J, Giangrande E, Weinberger DR, Dickinson D. The global cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: consistent over decades and around the world. Schizophr Res. 2013 Oct;150(1):42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
Green MF. What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia? Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Mar;153(3):321-30. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.3.321.
Kuo SS, Almasy L, Gur RC, Prasad K, Roalf DR, Gur RE, Nimgaonkar VL, Pogue-Geile MF. Cognition and community functioning in schizophrenia: The nature of the relationship. J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Feb;127(2):216-227. doi: 10.1037/abn0000326.
Keefe RS, Bilder RM, Davis SM, Harvey PD, Palmer BW, Gold JM, Meltzer HY, Green MF, Capuano G, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Rosenheck RA, Perkins DO, Davis CE, Hsiao JK, Lieberman JA; CATIE Investigators; Neurocognitive Working Group. Neurocognitive effects of antipsychotic medications in patients with chronic schizophrenia in the CATIE Trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;64(6):633-47. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.6.633.
Hori H, Noguchi H, Hashimoto R, Nakabayashi T, Omori M, Takahashi S, Tsukue R, Anami K, Hirabayashi N, Harada S, Saitoh O, Iwase M, Kajimoto O, Takeda M, Okabe S, Kunugi H. Antipsychotic medication and cognitive function in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2006 Sep;86(1-3):138-46. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.05.004. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
Moncrieff J, Cohen D, Mason JP. The subjective experience of taking antipsychotic medication: a content analysis of Internet data. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Aug;120(2):102-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01356.x. Epub 2009 Feb 15.
McCleery A, Nuechterlein KH. Cognitive impairment in psychotic illness: prevalence, profile of impairment, developmental course, and treatment considerations . Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2019 Sep;21(3):239-248. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/amccleery.
Marder SR, Fenton W. Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia: NIMH MATRICS initiative to support the development of agents for improving cognition in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2004 Dec 15;72(1):5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.010.
Green MF, Nuechterlein KH. The MATRICS initiative: developing a consensus cognitive battery for clinical trials. Schizophr Res. 2004 Dec 15;72(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.006. No abstract available.
Best MW, Milanovic M, Iftene F, Bowie CR. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Executive Functioning Training Compared With Perceptual Training for Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: Effects on Neurophysiology, Neurocognition, and Functioning. Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 1;176(4):297-306. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18070849. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
McGurk SR, Twamley EW, Sitzer DI, McHugo GJ, Mueser KT. A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;164(12):1791-802. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060906.
Wykes T, Huddy V, Cellard C, McGurk SR, Czobor P. A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: methodology and effect sizes. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 May;168(5):472-85. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10060855. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
Lejeune JA, Northrop A, Kurtz MM. A Meta-analysis of Cognitive Remediation for Schizophrenia: Efficacy and the Role of Participant and Treatment Factors. Schizophr Bull. 2021 Jul 8;47(4):997-1006. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbab022.
Vita A, Barlati S, Ceraso A, Nibbio G, Ariu C, Deste G, Wykes T. Effectiveness, Core Elements, and Moderators of Response of Cognitive Remediation for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 1;78(8):848-858. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0620.
Adcock RA, Dale C, Fisher M, Aldebot S, Genevsky A, Simpson GV, Nagarajan S, Vinogradov S. When top-down meets bottom-up: auditory training enhances verbal memory in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2009 Nov;35(6):1132-41. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp068. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
Vinogradov S. Has the Time Come for Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia...Again? Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 1;176(4):262-264. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19020160. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Fondecyt 11231216
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.