Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
81 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-05-31
2012-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Energy Expenditure, Sleep and Macronutrients
NCT01551238
Effects of Beef Protein Consumption on Energy Intake
NCT01646749
Protein Intake Distribution to Support Muscle Anabolism in Healthy Young Adults
NCT07245199
Protect - The Impact of a High Protein Diet on Preservation of Muscle Mass
NCT01915030
Manipulation of Dietary Protein and the Anabolic Response
NCT01820975
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Protein intake of 5 energy percent
Differences in protein content of meals
Differences in protein content (energy percent) of meals
Protein intake of 15 energy percent
Differences in protein content of meals
Differences in protein content (energy percent) of meals
Protein intake of 30 energy percent
Differences in protein content of meals
Differences in protein content (energy percent) of meals
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Differences in protein content of meals
Differences in protein content (energy percent) of meals
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age between 18-70 years
* healthy
* non-smoking
* not using a more than moderate amount of alcohol (\> 10 consumptions/wk)
* weight stable (weight change \< 3 kg during the last 6 months)
* not using medication or supplements except for oral contraceptives in women
Exclusion Criteria
* smoking
* using a more than moderate amount of alcohol
* not being weight stable
* using medication or supplements except for oral contraceptives in women
* do not meet the criteria for BMI and age
* pregnant or lactating
* allergic for the used food items
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eveline Martens
PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Margriet S. Westerterp-Plantenga, Prof. dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maastricht University, Department of Human Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM)
Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Simpson SJ, Raubenheimer D. Obesity: the protein leverage hypothesis. Obes Rev. 2005 May;6(2):133-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00178.x.
Sorensen A, Mayntz D, Raubenheimer D, Simpson SJ. Protein-leverage in mice: the geometry of macronutrient balancing and consequences for fat deposition. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Mar;16(3):566-71. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.58. Epub 2008 Jan 17.
Weigle DS, Breen PA, Matthys CC, Callahan HS, Meeuws KE, Burden VR, Purnell JQ. A high-protein diet induces sustained reductions in appetite, ad libitum caloric intake, and body weight despite compensatory changes in diurnal plasma leptin and ghrelin concentrations. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Jul;82(1):41-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcn.82.1.41.
Leidy HJ, Tang M, Armstrong CL, Martin CB, Campbell WW. The effects of consuming frequent, higher protein meals on appetite and satiety during weight loss in overweight/obese men. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Apr;19(4):818-24. doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.203. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
Martens EA, Tan SY, Mattes RD, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. No protein intake compensation for insufficient indispensable amino acid intake with a low-protein diet for 12 days. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2014 Aug 20;11:38. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-11-38. eCollection 2014.
Martens EA, Lemmens SG, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Protein leverage affects energy intake of high-protein diets in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jan;97(1):86-93. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.046540. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL36167
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.