Comparative Study Between Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia in Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Operation

NCT ID: NCT07114250

Last Updated: 2025-08-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-05-30

Study Completion Date

2026-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of spinal anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia in PCNL operation in supine position.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Nephrolithiasis remains a common health problem around the globe. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the preferred modality for large and complex renal calculi. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the treatment of choice for calculi which fail treatment with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and ureteral endoscopy.

There are variations to Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, including position, imaging modality, dilatation method, and anesthesia method. There is conflicting evidence between the appropriate use of general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

The conventional position of Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is prone, which allows direct access to the posterior calyx with minimal risk of bowel puncture.

However, this positioning method limits the possibility of switching anesthesia from regional to general. The alternative position is supine Advantage in this position is that the spine does not overlap with kidney and fluoroscopic visualization can be achieved.

Nowadays, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is usually performed under general anesthesia from a urological perspective, the particular advantages of general anesthesia in Percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedure include its feasibility to control tidal volume, secure patient airway, and extensibility of anesthesia time. The feasibility of controlling tidal volume minimizes renal mobility secondary to respiration while the extensibility of anesthesia time allows the surgeon to create multiple punctures with subsequently increased efficacy of the procedure . Despite the superior results of Percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgeries under general anesthesia, it has found to be associated with certain disadvantages such as its high cost and higher incidences of drug interactions. The incidence of complications is high especially when the position of patient is changed from supine to prone position. Common complications associated with use of general anesthesia i.e. injury to lung, brachial plexus, tongue and occasionally to spinal cord are its major drawback. Other minor but common side effects include postoperative nausea and vomiting On the other hand, there are recent reports regarding the use of spinal anesthesia in Percutaneous nephrolithotomy demonstrating lower post-operation pain, less drug intake, less bleeding, and reduces venous pressure in the surgery field .A limited number of prospective randomized trials have been carried out to establish which one of these procedures is better at decreasing perioperative complications. The influence of the type of anesthesia on the effectiveness of Percutaneous nephrolithotomy remains uncertain. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of spinal anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia in Percutaneous nephrolithotomy operation in supine position.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of spinal anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia in Percutaneous nephrolithotomy operation in supine position.

Primary outcome:

• Patient satisfaction

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Anesthesia Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy General Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Spinal Anesthesia

Spinal Anesthesia: Patients included in this group will undergo supine Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal anesthesia

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

spinal anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Spinal Anesthesia group: Patients included in this group will undergo supine Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal anesthesia

General Anesthesia

Patients included in this group will undergo supine Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

General Anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

General Anesthesia : Patients included in this group will undergo supine Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

spinal anesthesia

Spinal Anesthesia group: Patients included in this group will undergo supine Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

General Anesthesia

General Anesthesia : Patients included in this group will undergo supine Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age more than 21 years old.
* Both sexes.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (I- II).
* Patient with single renal stone size 2-3cm prepared for supine Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal.
* Pregnancy
* Morbid obese with Body mass index \> 35 kg/m2.
* Contraindication for spinal anesthesia.
* Renal anomalies (horseshoe kidney, ectopic kidney).
* Presence of multiple stones or staghorn stones.
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tanta University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aya Ahmed Mahmoud Ibrahim Hamouda

Resident

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aya Hamouda, Resident

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tanta University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tanta University

Tanta, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Aya Hamouda, Resident

Role: CONTACT

+20 12 28671528

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Aya Hamouda, Resident

Role: primary

+20 12 28671528

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

36264MS737/11/24

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Preoperative Block for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery
NCT06867510 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE3
Erector Spina Plane Block Volume Comparison
NCT06332313 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA