Comparative Study Between Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia in Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Operation
NCT ID: NCT07114250
Last Updated: 2025-08-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-05-30
2026-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
General Anesthesia Versus Spinal Anesthesia With Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Buccal Mucosal Graft in Urethroplasty
NCT07074730
Postoperative Analgesia Practices After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT07258901
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Block for Analgesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT06710444
Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Thoracotomy
NCT05507281
Efficiency of Erector Spinae Plane Block For Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT03652103
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are variations to Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, including position, imaging modality, dilatation method, and anesthesia method. There is conflicting evidence between the appropriate use of general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
The conventional position of Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is prone, which allows direct access to the posterior calyx with minimal risk of bowel puncture.
However, this positioning method limits the possibility of switching anesthesia from regional to general. The alternative position is supine Advantage in this position is that the spine does not overlap with kidney and fluoroscopic visualization can be achieved.
Nowadays, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is usually performed under general anesthesia from a urological perspective, the particular advantages of general anesthesia in Percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedure include its feasibility to control tidal volume, secure patient airway, and extensibility of anesthesia time. The feasibility of controlling tidal volume minimizes renal mobility secondary to respiration while the extensibility of anesthesia time allows the surgeon to create multiple punctures with subsequently increased efficacy of the procedure . Despite the superior results of Percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgeries under general anesthesia, it has found to be associated with certain disadvantages such as its high cost and higher incidences of drug interactions. The incidence of complications is high especially when the position of patient is changed from supine to prone position. Common complications associated with use of general anesthesia i.e. injury to lung, brachial plexus, tongue and occasionally to spinal cord are its major drawback. Other minor but common side effects include postoperative nausea and vomiting On the other hand, there are recent reports regarding the use of spinal anesthesia in Percutaneous nephrolithotomy demonstrating lower post-operation pain, less drug intake, less bleeding, and reduces venous pressure in the surgery field .A limited number of prospective randomized trials have been carried out to establish which one of these procedures is better at decreasing perioperative complications. The influence of the type of anesthesia on the effectiveness of Percutaneous nephrolithotomy remains uncertain. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of spinal anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia in Percutaneous nephrolithotomy operation in supine position.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of spinal anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia in Percutaneous nephrolithotomy operation in supine position.
Primary outcome:
• Patient satisfaction
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Spinal Anesthesia
Spinal Anesthesia: Patients included in this group will undergo supine Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal anesthesia
spinal anesthesia
Spinal Anesthesia group: Patients included in this group will undergo supine Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal anesthesia
General Anesthesia
Patients included in this group will undergo supine Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia.
General Anesthesia
General Anesthesia : Patients included in this group will undergo supine Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
spinal anesthesia
Spinal Anesthesia group: Patients included in this group will undergo supine Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal anesthesia
General Anesthesia
General Anesthesia : Patients included in this group will undergo supine Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Both sexes.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (I- II).
* Patient with single renal stone size 2-3cm prepared for supine Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Morbid obese with Body mass index \> 35 kg/m2.
* Contraindication for spinal anesthesia.
* Renal anomalies (horseshoe kidney, ectopic kidney).
* Presence of multiple stones or staghorn stones.
22 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tanta University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aya Ahmed Mahmoud Ibrahim Hamouda
Resident
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aya Hamouda, Resident
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tanta University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tanta University
Tanta, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
36264MS737/11/24
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.