Efficiency of Erector Spinae Plane Block For Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT ID: NCT03652103
Last Updated: 2021-04-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
64 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-09-05
2019-03-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
One of the two groups will receive ESP catheterization after general anesthesia conducted. The other group will receive routine analgesia protocol used for PNL.
The total amount of drugs administered, pain scores(NRS) at certain time intervals and at certain events(removal of nephrostomy and pain at mobilization) will be recorded and compared.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT05845281
Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Patients: a Retrospective Study
NCT03897933
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Block for Analgesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT06710444
Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT06078241
Effectivenes of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy?
NCT04474873
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To provide better analgesia for surgical procedures, anesthesiologists use truncal blocks for peripheral intervention. Although these blocks are generally very effective and easy to apply, they are limited by a relatively small area of effectivity. In order to achieve denser effects for larger surfaces, epidural anesthesia must be used with the risk of more severe complications than any peripheral or truncal nerve blocks. Epidural anesthesia also has the disadvantages of requiring more experience and more cautiousness than ultrasound-guided truncal blocks and risks of an undesirable temporary motor blockade. ESP block could be the answer for better regional analgesia while avoiding motor blockade and complications of epidural anesthesia.
The study will have two groups as Block Group(GB) and Control Group(GC) and two periods as during operation and 48 hours after the operation. Every participant will receive Total Intravenous Anesthesia(TIVA) and will be monitored with ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, heart rate, pulse oximeter, and Bispectral Index. Participants in GB will receive ultrasound-guided ESP block catheter after proper maintenance of anesthesia provided. The first period will be during operation. We will evaluate the administered drug amounts per kilogram for each patient. Investigators believe ESP block will help them deliver proper anesthesia with lower dosages. The second period will include postoperative 48 hours. Pain scores(NRS) will be evaluated at certain time intervals and at two critical moments between the two groups. One of the critical moment which patients fear and feel the pain most is the removal time of nephrostomy. The second moment is the first time patients start walking.
Rescue analgesia will be ordered on demand for both groups as IV 1 mg/kg tramadol. Hours and amounts of rescue analgesia administered will be recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GCont
Only dressing will be applied to patients without actually nerve catheter performed
No interventions assigned to this group
GBlock
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Catheter will be applied: 20ml Bupivacaine 0.25% Injectable Solution\* will be administered initially.
20 ml Bupivacaine %0.25 Injectable Solution\*\* will be administered 30 minutes before ambulation at postoperative day(POD) 0 and before removal of nephrostomy at POD 2
\*10ml %0,5 Bupivacaine will be diluted with 10ml Saline solution.
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Catheterisation
After receiving general anesthesia, patients will positioned prone. Before operation begins, ESP block catheter will be applied with ultrasound guidance to the same level as surgeon's incision.
Bupivacaine 0.25% Injectable Solution
Perineural Injection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Catheterisation
After receiving general anesthesia, patients will positioned prone. Before operation begins, ESP block catheter will be applied with ultrasound guidance to the same level as surgeon's incision.
Bupivacaine 0.25% Injectable Solution
Perineural Injection
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who has informed consent for study
* Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification(ASA) I and II
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients under 18 years of age
* Patients who are undergoing surgery with an anesthesia technique other than total intravenous anesthesia for any reason (inhalation anesthesia, laryngeal mask application, etc.)
* Patients with known local anesthetic allergy
* Patients with Body mass index \> 35
* Patients diagnosed sepsis and bacteriemia,
* Skin infection at the injection site,
* Patients with previous spinal surgery
* History of coagulopathy or anticoagulant therapy
* Patients with uncontrolled diabetes ,
* Uncoordinated patients,
* Psychological and emotional lability,
* Surgical intervention longer than 3 hours.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mehmet Uğur Bilgin
Anesthesiology Resident
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital
Karabağlar, İzmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ESPforPNL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.