Efficiency of Erector Spinae Plane Block For Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

NCT ID: NCT03652103

Last Updated: 2021-04-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-05

Study Completion Date

2019-03-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Investigators' goal is to determine whether Erector Spinae Plane Block would provide a better analgesia, help mobilization and early discharge or increase satisfaction for patients undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy(PNL).

One of the two groups will receive ESP catheterization after general anesthesia conducted. The other group will receive routine analgesia protocol used for PNL.

The total amount of drugs administered, pain scores(NRS) at certain time intervals and at certain events(removal of nephrostomy and pain at mobilization) will be recorded and compared.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Erector Spinae Plane Block(ESP) is a rather new method which can block ventral and dorsal rami of spinal nerves in the paravertebral area after they leave the spinal column. Originally used for thoracic somites, by spreading in a craniocaudal fashion in the erector spinae muscle group, it has the potential of blocking cervical or lumbar nerves as well.

To provide better analgesia for surgical procedures, anesthesiologists use truncal blocks for peripheral intervention. Although these blocks are generally very effective and easy to apply, they are limited by a relatively small area of effectivity. In order to achieve denser effects for larger surfaces, epidural anesthesia must be used with the risk of more severe complications than any peripheral or truncal nerve blocks. Epidural anesthesia also has the disadvantages of requiring more experience and more cautiousness than ultrasound-guided truncal blocks and risks of an undesirable temporary motor blockade. ESP block could be the answer for better regional analgesia while avoiding motor blockade and complications of epidural anesthesia.

The study will have two groups as Block Group(GB) and Control Group(GC) and two periods as during operation and 48 hours after the operation. Every participant will receive Total Intravenous Anesthesia(TIVA) and will be monitored with ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, heart rate, pulse oximeter, and Bispectral Index. Participants in GB will receive ultrasound-guided ESP block catheter after proper maintenance of anesthesia provided. The first period will be during operation. We will evaluate the administered drug amounts per kilogram for each patient. Investigators believe ESP block will help them deliver proper anesthesia with lower dosages. The second period will include postoperative 48 hours. Pain scores(NRS) will be evaluated at certain time intervals and at two critical moments between the two groups. One of the critical moment which patients fear and feel the pain most is the removal time of nephrostomy. The second moment is the first time patients start walking.

Rescue analgesia will be ordered on demand for both groups as IV 1 mg/kg tramadol. Hours and amounts of rescue analgesia administered will be recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous Anesthetics, Local Nerve Block Erector Spinae Plane Block Pain, Postoperative Anesthesia and Analgesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two groups involved. First group will receive total intravenous anesthesia and erector spinae plane block catheter Second group will receive total intravenous anesthesia and routine analgesia protocol for percutaneous Nephrolithotomy procedures.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GCont

Only dressing will be applied to patients without actually nerve catheter performed

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

GBlock

Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Catheter will be applied: 20ml Bupivacaine 0.25% Injectable Solution\* will be administered initially.

20 ml Bupivacaine %0.25 Injectable Solution\*\* will be administered 30 minutes before ambulation at postoperative day(POD) 0 and before removal of nephrostomy at POD 2

\*10ml %0,5 Bupivacaine will be diluted with 10ml Saline solution.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Catheterisation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After receiving general anesthesia, patients will positioned prone. Before operation begins, ESP block catheter will be applied with ultrasound guidance to the same level as surgeon's incision.

Bupivacaine 0.25% Injectable Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Perineural Injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Catheterisation

After receiving general anesthesia, patients will positioned prone. Before operation begins, ESP block catheter will be applied with ultrasound guidance to the same level as surgeon's incision.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bupivacaine 0.25% Injectable Solution

Perineural Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Marcain

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who are scheduled for percutaneous nephrolithotomy under total intravenous anesthesia
* Patients who has informed consent for study
* Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification(ASA) I and II

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient's refusal to participate
* Patients under 18 years of age
* Patients who are undergoing surgery with an anesthesia technique other than total intravenous anesthesia for any reason (inhalation anesthesia, laryngeal mask application, etc.)
* Patients with known local anesthetic allergy
* Patients with Body mass index \> 35
* Patients diagnosed sepsis and bacteriemia,
* Skin infection at the injection site,
* Patients with previous spinal surgery
* History of coagulopathy or anticoagulant therapy
* Patients with uncontrolled diabetes ,
* Uncoordinated patients,
* Psychological and emotional lability,
* Surgical intervention longer than 3 hours.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mehmet Uğur Bilgin

Anesthesiology Resident

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital

Karabağlar, İzmir, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ESPforPNL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Erector Spina Plane Block Volume Comparison
NCT06332313 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
USG Guided ESP Block in Spinal Surgery
NCT04148729 COMPLETED PHASE4