Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Caudal Block in Penile Surgeries in Pediatrics
NCT ID: NCT06235944
Last Updated: 2024-02-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-01
2023-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound Guided Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block in Pediatric Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery
NCT07099560
Erector Spinae Plane Block in Pediatric Lower Limb Surgery
NCT05369455
Conventional Caudal Block, Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block and Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block for Pediatric Hip Surgery
NCT04712370
Sacral Erector Spinae,Penile and Caudal Block for Pain Relief After Hypospadias Surgery
NCT05307653
Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound Guided Errector Spinae Plane Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block in Pediatric Open Renal Surgeries.
NCT05289401
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The sacral ESPB is a technique known to block the posterior branches of the sacral nerves. Also it blocks the lumbosacral plexus especially the sacral spinal nerves (S2\_S4) when applied to high levels.
Caudal epidural block in children is one of the most widely administrated technique of regional anesthesia; it is an efficient way to offer perioperative analgesia for painful sub umbilical interventions. It enables early ambulation, hemodynamic stability and spontaneous breathing in patient groups at maximum risk of difficult airway.
Caudal block is a known worldwide technique but with some risks such as subdural, intra vascular injection, infection, injury to the nerve root or local anesthesia. Therefore, we try a new technique as sacral ESPB.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Caudal block
Patients were received (plain bupivacaine 0.25% 1 mg/kg + 2 % lidocaine 3 mg /kg) in total volume 1ml/ kg max 20 ml via Ultrasound Guided caudal Block.
Caudal block
Patients were received (plain bupivacaine 0.25% 1 mg/kg + 2 % lidocaine 3 mg /kg) in total volume 1ml/ kg max 20 ml via Ultrasound Guided caudal Block.
Sacral erector spinae
Patients were received (plain bupivacaine 0.25% 1 mg/kg + 2 % lidocaine 3 mg /kg) in total volume of 1 ml/ kg maximum 20ml divided in both sides via ultrasound guided sacral erector spinae plain block (ESPB).
Sacral erector spinae block
Patients were received (plain bupivacaine 0.25% 1 mg/kg + 2 % lidocaine 3 mg /kg) in total volume of 1 ml/ kg maximum 20ml divided in both sides via ultrasound guided sacral erector spinae plain block (ESPB).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Caudal block
Patients were received (plain bupivacaine 0.25% 1 mg/kg + 2 % lidocaine 3 mg /kg) in total volume 1ml/ kg max 20 ml via Ultrasound Guided caudal Block.
Sacral erector spinae block
Patients were received (plain bupivacaine 0.25% 1 mg/kg + 2 % lidocaine 3 mg /kg) in total volume of 1 ml/ kg maximum 20ml divided in both sides via ultrasound guided sacral erector spinae plain block (ESPB).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male children.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I - II.
* Male who admitted for penile surgeries.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients presented with symptoms or signs of increased intracranial tension.
* Patients presented with advanced kidney, cardiac or liver diseases.
* Coagulation and bleeding disorders.
* Patients presented with skin or soft tissue infection at the proposed site of needle Insertion.
* Pre-existing neurologic disease (e.g. lower extremity peripheral neuropathy).
* Patients with known allergy to study drugs.
* Patints with developmental or mental delay.
3 Years
6 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tanta University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aya Allah Hamdy Elbahy
Resident of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tanta University
Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
34989/10/21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.