Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Caudal Block in Penile Surgeries in Pediatrics

NCT ID: NCT06235944

Last Updated: 2024-02-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-01

Study Completion Date

2023-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study will be conducted to compare the efficacy of ultrasound guided Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block to caudal block on pain management in penile surgeries in pediatrics.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a relatively new interfacial plane block that is used for postoperative analgesia in penile surgeries in pediatrics.

The sacral ESPB is a technique known to block the posterior branches of the sacral nerves. Also it blocks the lumbosacral plexus especially the sacral spinal nerves (S2\_S4) when applied to high levels.

Caudal epidural block in children is one of the most widely administrated technique of regional anesthesia; it is an efficient way to offer perioperative analgesia for painful sub umbilical interventions. It enables early ambulation, hemodynamic stability and spontaneous breathing in patient groups at maximum risk of difficult airway.

Caudal block is a known worldwide technique but with some risks such as subdural, intra vascular injection, infection, injury to the nerve root or local anesthesia. Therefore, we try a new technique as sacral ESPB.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Caudal Block Penile Surgeries Pediatrics

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Caudal block

Patients were received (plain bupivacaine 0.25% 1 mg/kg + 2 % lidocaine 3 mg /kg) in total volume 1ml/ kg max 20 ml via Ultrasound Guided caudal Block.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Caudal block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients were received (plain bupivacaine 0.25% 1 mg/kg + 2 % lidocaine 3 mg /kg) in total volume 1ml/ kg max 20 ml via Ultrasound Guided caudal Block.

Sacral erector spinae

Patients were received (plain bupivacaine 0.25% 1 mg/kg + 2 % lidocaine 3 mg /kg) in total volume of 1 ml/ kg maximum 20ml divided in both sides via ultrasound guided sacral erector spinae plain block (ESPB).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sacral erector spinae block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients were received (plain bupivacaine 0.25% 1 mg/kg + 2 % lidocaine 3 mg /kg) in total volume of 1 ml/ kg maximum 20ml divided in both sides via ultrasound guided sacral erector spinae plain block (ESPB).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Caudal block

Patients were received (plain bupivacaine 0.25% 1 mg/kg + 2 % lidocaine 3 mg /kg) in total volume 1ml/ kg max 20 ml via Ultrasound Guided caudal Block.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sacral erector spinae block

Patients were received (plain bupivacaine 0.25% 1 mg/kg + 2 % lidocaine 3 mg /kg) in total volume of 1 ml/ kg maximum 20ml divided in both sides via ultrasound guided sacral erector spinae plain block (ESPB).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children aged between 3 to 6 years.
* Male children.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I - II.
* Male who admitted for penile surgeries.

Exclusion Criteria

* Parents who refused regional anesthesia.
* Patients presented with symptoms or signs of increased intracranial tension.
* Patients presented with advanced kidney, cardiac or liver diseases.
* Coagulation and bleeding disorders.
* Patients presented with skin or soft tissue infection at the proposed site of needle Insertion.
* Pre-existing neurologic disease (e.g. lower extremity peripheral neuropathy).
* Patients with known allergy to study drugs.
* Patints with developmental or mental delay.
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tanta University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aya Allah Hamdy Elbahy

Resident of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tanta University

Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

34989/10/21

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.