Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of ESP Block and Caudal Block in Patients Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery
NCT ID: NCT05632536
Last Updated: 2024-10-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
68 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-12-21
2023-12-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this study, investigators seek answers to the following questions:
Which of the sacral (ESP) block and caudal block applied to participants undergoing hypospadias surgery has higher postoperative analgesic efficiency than the other? Which of the sacral ESP block and caudal block applied to participants undergoing hypospadias surgery is superior in duration of analgesia? After general anesthesia is administered to the participants, one of the 2 blocks will be administered in a randomized manner and the relevant data will be recorded. This research will be conducted in a single center as a prospective randomized controlled study. It was planned to include 60 participnts from the ASA I-II pediatric participants aged between 6 months and 7 years, who will undergo hypospadias surgery between December 2022-December 2023, and randomization will be done by closed envelope method. Two groups with sacral ESP and caudal block will be formed, each with 30 participants.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Caudal Epidural Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery
NCT07286786
Comparison Sacral Erector Spinae Block Versus Caudal Block
NCT04106687
Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Penile Block in Hypospadias Surgery
NCT04866368
Ultrasound Guided Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block in Pediatric Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery
NCT07099560
Effects of Erector Spinae Plane and Caudal Block on Postoperative Stress Response
NCT05633173
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study was planned to be performed as a double blind. Sacral ESP and caudal block will be administered by an anesthesiologist not responsible for the perioperative and postoperative management of the participants. A second anesthesiologist, who will be in charge of monitoring and data recording, will be unaware of the participants' group assignments. Additionally, parents, surgeons, and other personnel involved in the data collection process will be unaware of the group to which the child is assigned. Surgeons will not be present in the operating room while the anesthesiologist administers the block (sacral ESP block or caudal block). All participants will undergo aseptic skin preparation using Betadine. Since bandages will be applied to two points, the actual injection site will not be known.
The age, height, weight, gender and ASA scores of the participants in both groups will be recorded.
After the participants are taken to the operation table, standard monitoring will be performed. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), body temperature, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) will be monitored and all parameters before surgical incision, after surgical incision, before awakening, postoperative 5 and 30 minutes will be recorded.
All participants will be placed in an IV cannula using 8% sevoflurane in 50/50 O2 / air for 2 - 4 minutes with a face mask, followed by induction of inhaled anesthesia. All participants will be placed in I-gel (supraglottic airway vehicle) by performing routine induction of general anesthesia with propofol 2-3 mg kg-1, fentanyl 1 mcg kg-1. Participants will have mechanical ventilatory support and tidal volume will be set to 8- 10 ml/kg and minute breathing will be set to 16-26. The end tidal carbon dioxide will be kept between 35-40 mmHg. Anesthesia maintenance will be provided with a starting dose of sevoflurane 2% and IV remifentanil 0.05 mcg kg-1 min-1 with a flow of 3 Lt min-1, an Oxygen/air mixture. \>20% increase in intraoperative heart rate will be evaluated as pain and remifentanil dose will be increased and the need for remifentanil used intraoperatively will be recorded.
Group ESP (n=30) participants will be given a lateral decubitus position under general anesthesia before the operation and sacral ESP block will be performed accompanied by ultrasound. Group C (n=30) participants who will undergo caudal block will also be given a lateral decubitus position and ultrasound-guided block will be performed.
After 15 minutes of block surgery will be initiated. All operations will be performed by the same experienced team with the same surgical technique.
Near the end of the operation, 15 mg kg-1 IV paracetamol will be given. At the end of the operation, the duration of operation will be recorded.
Pain scoring system Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) will be recorded in 5th and 30th minutes and 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th, 24th hours.
At the end of the operation, the time when there is a need for analgesia will be evaluated as "the first need for analgesia (hour)".
Total amount of additional analgesia (oral paracetamol, mg), amount of rescue analgesia (oral ibuprofen, mg), participants' relative satisfaction (1-Not satisfied, 2-Satisfied, 3-Very satisfied) will be recorded.
Motor weakness, neurological deficit, urinary retention, nausea, vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, itching, local anesthetic toxicity and bleeding that may occur will be recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GROUP ESP
Before the operation, under general anesthesia, group ESP (n=30) patients will be blocked with the sacral ESP block method. By giving the lateral decubitus position, the linear ultrasound probe will be placed in the sterilized area longitudinally on the midline of the sacrum. The erector spinae muscle and the sacral medial crest will be visualized. The 22 gauge, 50 mm needle will be advanced in the direction from cranial to caudal to reach the sacral crest. 0.25% bupivacaine from a dose of 1 mL kg-1 will be aspirated and injected every 2 mL under the erector spina muscle at the level of the median sacral crest at the level of the 4th sacral vertebra. (A test dose will be administered with 1 mL of saline.)
SACRAL ESP AND CAUDAL BLOCK
Application of ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane (ESP) block or ultrasound-guided caudal block with 1mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine (local anesthetic) to patients
GROUP C
Group C (n=30) patients to whom caudal block will be applied will be placed in the lateral decubitus position and the linear ultrasound probe will be placed longitudinally in the sterilized area on the midline of the sacrum. A 2.5 cm 22 gauge needle will be inserted over the back skin of the sacral hiatus (located distal to the sacrum and formed by the two sacral cornua on its lateral edges) at a 90° position. The sacrococcygeal ligament will be crossed, the needle will be oriented approximately 25° and advanced approximately 2 to 3 mm to reach the sacral canal. After entering the sacral hiatus and confirming the location with negative aspiration method, 1 mL kg-1 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected by aspiration every 2 mL (test dose will be administered with 1 mL saline).
SACRAL ESP AND CAUDAL BLOCK
Application of ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane (ESP) block or ultrasound-guided caudal block with 1mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine (local anesthetic) to patients
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SACRAL ESP AND CAUDAL BLOCK
Application of ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane (ESP) block or ultrasound-guided caudal block with 1mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine (local anesthetic) to patients
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 6 months to 7 years old
* Paediatric age group patients who will undergo hypospadias surgery under general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who were operated on urgently
* Patient relatives who did not give consent
* Presence of local anesthetic allergy
* Presence of infection in the area to be blocked
* Presence of coagulation disorder
* Severe organ failure
* Pre-existing neurological deficit
* Mental Retardation
* Anatomical Deformity
6 Months
7 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sevgi Kesici, MD
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sevgi KESİCİ
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sisli Etfal
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Research and Training Hospital
Sarıyer, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mostafa SF, Abdelghany MS, Abdelraheem TM, Abu Elyazed MM. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing splenectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2019 Dec;29(12):1201-1207. doi: 10.1111/pan.13758. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
Aksu C, Gurkan Y. Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block with longitudinal midline approach: Could it be the new era for pediatric postoperative analgesia? J Clin Anesth. 2020 Feb;59:38-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 13. No abstract available.
Kundra P, Yuvaraj K, Agrawal K, Krishnappa S, Kumar LT. Surgical outcome in children undergoing hypospadias repair under caudal epidural vs penile block. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Jul;22(7):707-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03702.x. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
Ozen V, Yigit D. Caudal epidural block versus ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block for pediatric distal hypospadias surgery: A prospective, observational study. J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Aug;16(4):438.e1-438.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.05.009. Epub 2020 May 20.
Kaya C, Dost B, Tulgar S. Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Provides Surgical Anesthesia in Ambulatory Anorectal Surgery: Two Case Reports. Cureus. 2021 Jan 9;13(1):e12598. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12598.
Topdagi Yilmaz EP, Oral Ahiskalioglu E, Ahiskalioglu A, Tulgar S, Aydin ME, Kumtepe Y. A Novel Multimodal Treatment Method and Pilot Feasibility Study for Vaginismus: Initial Experience With the Combination of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Progressive Dilatation. Cureus. 2020 Oct 8;12(10):e10846. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10846.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
240819
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.