Comparison of Caudal Block and Sacral Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia
NCT ID: NCT05688813
Last Updated: 2023-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-05-01
2022-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Caudal Block and Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia
NCT05284734
Caudal Epidural Block Versus Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block for Pediatric Circumcision
NCT04268511
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Caudal Epidural Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery
NCT07286786
Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Penile Block For Analgesia In Pediatric Circumcision
NCT07321717
Caudal Block vs Retrolaminar Block on Analgesic Consumption in Undescended Testis Surgeries
NCT06725862
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Caudal block group
An echogenic block needle (22 Gauge 50 mm) was then advanced into the sacral canal through the sacrococcygeal membrane while a longitudinal position was used, continuing with the in-plane technique. After ensuring that there is no blood or cerebrospinal fluid with aspiration, 0.5 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine was administered while observing caudal epidural space dilation or turbulent flow with Doppler.
Regional anesthesia intervention
Ultrasound-guided caudal and sacral erector spinae blocks were administered
Sacral erector spinae block
Following antiseptic preparation of block site linear ultrasound probe was placed longitudinally to midline just above the sacrum. After the median sacral crests and erector spinae were identified, a 22G, 50 mm block needle was advanced from the cranial to the caudal direction until it touched the top of the 4th median sacral crest with the in-plane technique. After hydrodissection was achieved with 1 ml of saline, 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered after negative aspiration.
Regional anesthesia intervention
Ultrasound-guided caudal and sacral erector spinae blocks were administered
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Regional anesthesia intervention
Ultrasound-guided caudal and sacral erector spinae blocks were administered
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-II group
* Scheduled for circumcision
* Able to communicate in Turkish
* Willing to participate to the study (parents and children)
Exclusion Criteria
* A neurological deficit, bleeding diathesis, or a history of local anesthetic allergy; an infection or redness in the injection area, congenital lumbar anomaly, liver and/or kidney disorder, a psychiatric disorder, mental retardation, or communication problems detected during examination
* Unwilling to to participate to the study ((parents or children)
1 Year
7 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Volkan Ozen
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Aksu C, Sen MC, Akay MA, Baydemir C, Gurkan Y. Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Quadratus Lumborum Block for pediatric lower abdominal surgery: A double blinded, prospective, and randomized trial. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Nov;57:24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
Ozen V, Yigit D. A Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Dorsal Penile Nerve Block and Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block in Circumcision. Urol Int. 2020;104(11-12):871-877. doi: 10.1159/000509173. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
Desai N, Chan E, El-Boghdadly K, Albrecht E. Caudal analgesia versus abdominal wall blocks for pediatric genitourinary surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Nov;45(11):924-933. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101726. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021.51
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.