Caudal Epidural Vs. TAP Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Infraumbilical Surgery: a RCT
NCT ID: NCT06895382
Last Updated: 2025-04-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-12-15
2023-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A total of 60 pediatric patients (aged 1 to 7 years, ASA I-II) were randomly assigned to one of two groups:
* Group C (Caudal Block): Received 1 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine in the caudal epidural space.
* Group T (TAP Block): Received 0.3 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine injected into the transversus abdominis plane under ultrasound guidance.
Primary Outcome:
* Postoperative FLACC pain scores at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours.
Secondary Outcomes:
* Total analgesic consumption (including rescue analgesia).
* Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, SpO₂).
* Incidence of nausea and vomiting (PONV).
* Parental satisfaction scores.
The study aims to determine which regional anesthesia technique provides superior pain relief and reduces systemic analgesic requirements in pediatric patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Efficacy of Different Bupivacaine Concentrations in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
NCT04202367
Comparing Analgesic Effects of Three Ultrasound Guided Regional Anesthetic Techniques in Pediatrics
NCT03780790
Transversus Abdominis Plane Versus Caudal Block for Pediatrics
NCT02398123
Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Pediatric Surgery
NCT02723487
Comparing Analgesic Effects of Caudal and Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Pediatrics Undergoing Upper Abdominal Surgery
NCT04204343
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This randomized controlled trial was conducted at Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University Hospital between December 2022 and December 2023. A total of 60 pediatric patients (aged 1-7 years, ASA I-II) undergoing infraumbilical surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either:
* Caudal epidural block (1 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine via the sacral hiatus).
* TAP block (0.3 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine in the fascial plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles under ultrasound guidance).
General anesthesia was induced using sevoflurane inhalation, followed by propofol (2-3 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1 µg/kg) for IV induction. A laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was used, and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane at a MAC of 1.0%.
Outcome Measures:
* Primary Outcome:
* FLACC pain scores at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively.
* Secondary Outcomes:
* Total postoperative analgesic consumption (including rescue analgesia).
* Hemodynamic parameters (HR, SBP, DBP, SpO₂) recorded at predefined intraoperative time points.
* Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
* Parental satisfaction scores collected post-discharge.
Statistical Analysis:
Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0. Sample size was determined using G\*Power 3.1.9.2, with an effect size (d) of 0.75, power of 0.80, and Type I error of 0.05. The study followed randomized allocation with blinding of pain assessors.
This study aims to determine whether TAP block provides equivalent or superior analgesia compared to caudal epidural block in pediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgeries. Findings will help guide future pediatric regional anesthesia protocols.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group C - Caudal Epidural Block
Participants in this group received a caudal epidural block after the induction of general anesthesia. A 35-mm 22G or 30-mm 25G block needle was inserted through the sacrococcygeal ligament into the epidural space under aseptic conditions. After confirming negative aspiration for cerebrospinal fluid or blood, 1 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered.
Caudal Epidural Block
A caudal epidural block was performed after the induction of general anesthesia. Using a 35-mm 22G or 30-mm 25G block needle, the sacral hiatus was identified, and the needle was inserted through the sacrococcygeal ligament into the epidural space under aseptic conditions. After confirming negative aspiration for cerebrospinal fluid or blood, 1 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered.
Bupivacaine 0.25%
0.25% bupivacaine was administered in both intervention arms as part of the regional anesthesia procedure In the Caudal Block group, 1 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered into the caudal epidural space.
In the TAP Block group, 0.3 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered into the transversus abdominis plane under ultrasound guidance
Group T - Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block
Participants in this group received an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block after the induction of general anesthesia. A 22G, 50-mm insulated block needle was inserted using an in-plane technique under ultrasound guidance with a linear probe. The needle was advanced into the fascial plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. After confirming placement with a 0.5-1 mL test dose of 0.9% NaCl and negative aspiration for blood, 0.3 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered.
Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block
A transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block was performed after the induction of general anesthesia. Using a 22G, 50-mm insulated block needle, the injection was administered under ultrasound guidance using a linear probe and in-plane technique. The needle was advanced into the fascial plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. After confirming placement with a 0.5-1 mL test dose of 0.9% NaCl and negative aspiration for blood, 0.3 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered.
Bupivacaine 0.25%
0.25% bupivacaine was administered in both intervention arms as part of the regional anesthesia procedure In the Caudal Block group, 1 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered into the caudal epidural space.
In the TAP Block group, 0.3 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered into the transversus abdominis plane under ultrasound guidance
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Caudal Epidural Block
A caudal epidural block was performed after the induction of general anesthesia. Using a 35-mm 22G or 30-mm 25G block needle, the sacral hiatus was identified, and the needle was inserted through the sacrococcygeal ligament into the epidural space under aseptic conditions. After confirming negative aspiration for cerebrospinal fluid or blood, 1 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered.
Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block
A transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block was performed after the induction of general anesthesia. Using a 22G, 50-mm insulated block needle, the injection was administered under ultrasound guidance using a linear probe and in-plane technique. The needle was advanced into the fascial plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. After confirming placement with a 0.5-1 mL test dose of 0.9% NaCl and negative aspiration for blood, 0.3 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered.
Bupivacaine 0.25%
0.25% bupivacaine was administered in both intervention arms as part of the regional anesthesia procedure In the Caudal Block group, 1 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered into the caudal epidural space.
In the TAP Block group, 0.3 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered into the transversus abdominis plane under ultrasound guidance
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA Physical Status I-II.
* Undergoing infraumbilical abdominal surgery (e.g., hernia repair, orchiopexy, circumcision).
* Parental written informed consent obtained.
Exclusion Criteria
* Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders.
* Local infection at the injection site.
* Known allergy to local anesthetics.
* Neurological conditions (e.g., degenerative neuropathy, brain tumors, increased intracranial pressure).
* Intellectual disabilities affecting pain assessment.
* Chronic pain conditions or opioid use before surgery.
* Parental refusal to participate in the study.
1 Year
7 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Namik Kemal University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Onur Baran
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Onur Baran
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Namik Kemal University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tekirdag Namik Kemal University
Tekirdağ, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TNKU-PED-ANES-2022-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.