The Effect of Tap Block in Pain Relief in Pediatric Patients

NCT ID: NCT06812169

Last Updated: 2025-02-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-06-15

Study Completion Date

2022-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

TAP block applied for analgesic purposes in pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy surgery provides superior analgesia in analgesic relief in the first 24 hours postoperatively compared to the placebo-control group without any block. The objective of this study was to investigate the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of TAP block based on postoperative pain scores in pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy surgery. This study is valuable because of there are a limited number of studies in this field in pediatric patients in the literature.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was designed as prospectif, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind. A total of 60 pediatric patients, who were planned to undergo elective open appendectomy surgery under general anesthesia, were included in the study, with 30 patients in both groups eligible for the study. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. The randomisation in study was performed by using the closed envelope method. The TAP block was applied to Group I(Group S). The Group II(Group C) was patients who are not performed a block, and was taken as the control group. After all patients were taken to the operating table, ECG, non-invazive blood pressure, pulse oximetry and saturation monitoring were performed as the standard of ASA. During induction, 3mg/kg propofol, 1mg/kg fentanyl and 0.8 mg/ kg rocuronium were administered to all patients, then they were ventilated with 100% oxygen for 5 minutes and intubated with an appropriate intubation tube. After intubation in Grup S applied TAP block, the patients were covered with a sterile cleaned area, the transversus abdominis plane is visualized by placing the linear probe between the costal edge and the iliac wing, on the outer part of the abdominal wall, with a portable ultrasound device on the abdominal wall of the patients on the side to be repaired, and the external oblique muscle with the help of a 50 mm block needle. 0.25 % bupivacaine 0.5 ml/ kg maximum 20 ml was injected between the internal oblique and transverse muscles with in-plane tecnique. On the other hand, no blocks were applied to The Group C , and was taken as the control group. Anesthesia was maintained with 2% sevoflurane and 50% oxygen in air. Intravenous fluid maintenance was provied with isotonic-balanced electrolyte solution at 10 ml/kg/hour in both group. A maximum of 3 mg of morphine 50mcg/kg intravenously was given to all patients intraoperatively for analgesic purposes. At the end of the surgery, the patients were extubated under appropriate conditions.

Evaluation of postoperative pain; It was planned to be performed by a physician or a pain staff who did not perform the block, first in the postoperative recovery room and then in the ward, using The Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (FACES Scale). The primary outcome of the study is The Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (FACES Scale) scores of the patients, and the secondary outcomes are; time and amount of first additional rescue analgesic requirement, systolic-diastolic-mean arterial pressures, heart rate peaks and parental satisfaction scores. With predetermined time points; Postoperative baseline 0, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th and 24th hours of the patients' is The Wong-Baker FACE Scale scores, rescue analgesic totally amount, systolic-diastolic-mean arterial pressures, peak heart rates, and possible complications such as nausea and vomiting were recorded in both groups. Parental satisfaction levels were recorded on a numerical scale from 1 to 10 (1: lowest satisfaction, 10: highest satisfaction). If The Wong-Baker FACE Scale scores \> 4, acetaminophen 10 mg/kg IV was planned to be administered as an additional rescue analgesic in the ward. In this study, power analysis was performed after the analysis results. Sample size was calculated by power analysis based on data from a previous study (12). In this study, researchers; They compared the analgesic effectiveness of the patients who applied TAP block and the placebo-control group in the first 48 hours postoperatively in a total of 60 patients who underwent pediatric appendectomy, and revealed that Tap block provided superior analgesia compared to the placebo group. Power estimation analysis suggested that add 30 individuals to each group and the power of the test was found to be p= 0.9035. The error level was taken as 0.05. In this study, when α= 0.05 β= 0.10 1-β = 0.90.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Opioid Analgesia Pain, Postoperative Pain Score Reduction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group S

TAP block was applied to this group of open appendectomy patients.

No interventions assigned to this group

Group C

TAP block was not applied to this group of open appendectomy patients.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Those who have had surgery for acute appendicitis ASA status I-II

Exclusion Criteria

ASA III-IV Perforated appendectomies Laparoscopic cases Patients allergic to local anesthetic drugs. Bleeding diathesis Skin infection at the needle entry site Those who refused to participate in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Arnavutkoy State Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

GOKHAN ASLAN

Specialist Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Arnavutkoy State Hospital

Istanbul, Arnavutkoy, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mai CL, Young MJ, Quraishi SA. Clinical implications of the transversus abdominis plane block in pediatric anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Sep;22(9):831-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03916.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22834467 (View on PubMed)

Seyedhejazi M, Motarabbesoun S, Eslampoor Y, Taghizadieh N, Hazhir N. Appendectomy Pain Control by Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Children. Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Feb 20;9(1):e83975. doi: 10.5812/aapm.83975. eCollection 2019 Feb.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30881907 (View on PubMed)

Carney J, Finnerty O, Rauf J, Curley G, McDonnell JG, Laffey JG. Ipsilateral transversus abdominis plane block provides effective analgesia after appendectomy in children: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2010 Oct;111(4):998-1003. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181ee7bba. Epub 2010 Aug 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20802056 (View on PubMed)

Niraj G, Searle A, Mathews M, Misra V, Baban M, Kiani S, Wong M. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Oct;103(4):601-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep175. Epub 2009 Jun 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19561014 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GK-TAP-GAZ

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.