The Effect of Tap Block in Pain Relief in Pediatric Patients
NCT ID: NCT06812169
Last Updated: 2025-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-06-15
2022-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block(M-TAPA) in Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomies
NCT06039150
Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Alleviating Acute Appendicitis
NCT06808737
Transversalis Fascia Plane Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Children
NCT07242196
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Acute Appendicitis Pain Managment
NCT05004532
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block in The Pediatric Population Undergoing Orchiopexy
NCT03969316
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Evaluation of postoperative pain; It was planned to be performed by a physician or a pain staff who did not perform the block, first in the postoperative recovery room and then in the ward, using The Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (FACES Scale). The primary outcome of the study is The Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (FACES Scale) scores of the patients, and the secondary outcomes are; time and amount of first additional rescue analgesic requirement, systolic-diastolic-mean arterial pressures, heart rate peaks and parental satisfaction scores. With predetermined time points; Postoperative baseline 0, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th and 24th hours of the patients' is The Wong-Baker FACE Scale scores, rescue analgesic totally amount, systolic-diastolic-mean arterial pressures, peak heart rates, and possible complications such as nausea and vomiting were recorded in both groups. Parental satisfaction levels were recorded on a numerical scale from 1 to 10 (1: lowest satisfaction, 10: highest satisfaction). If The Wong-Baker FACE Scale scores \> 4, acetaminophen 10 mg/kg IV was planned to be administered as an additional rescue analgesic in the ward. In this study, power analysis was performed after the analysis results. Sample size was calculated by power analysis based on data from a previous study (12). In this study, researchers; They compared the analgesic effectiveness of the patients who applied TAP block and the placebo-control group in the first 48 hours postoperatively in a total of 60 patients who underwent pediatric appendectomy, and revealed that Tap block provided superior analgesia compared to the placebo group. Power estimation analysis suggested that add 30 individuals to each group and the power of the test was found to be p= 0.9035. The error level was taken as 0.05. In this study, when α= 0.05 β= 0.10 1-β = 0.90.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group S
TAP block was applied to this group of open appendectomy patients.
No interventions assigned to this group
Group C
TAP block was not applied to this group of open appendectomy patients.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
5 Years
16 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Arnavutkoy State Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
GOKHAN ASLAN
Specialist Anesthesiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Arnavutkoy State Hospital
Istanbul, Arnavutkoy, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mai CL, Young MJ, Quraishi SA. Clinical implications of the transversus abdominis plane block in pediatric anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Sep;22(9):831-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03916.x.
Seyedhejazi M, Motarabbesoun S, Eslampoor Y, Taghizadieh N, Hazhir N. Appendectomy Pain Control by Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Children. Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Feb 20;9(1):e83975. doi: 10.5812/aapm.83975. eCollection 2019 Feb.
Carney J, Finnerty O, Rauf J, Curley G, McDonnell JG, Laffey JG. Ipsilateral transversus abdominis plane block provides effective analgesia after appendectomy in children: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2010 Oct;111(4):998-1003. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181ee7bba. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
Niraj G, Searle A, Mathews M, Misra V, Baban M, Kiani S, Wong M. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Oct;103(4):601-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep175. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GK-TAP-GAZ
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.