Comparing the Effects of M-TAPA and TAP Block on Postoperative Analgesia in TAH
NCT ID: NCT05901090
Last Updated: 2023-06-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-04-12
2023-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of M-TAPA and TAP Blocks on Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Appendectomy Surgeries
NCT06483581
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAP) Versus Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgeries
NCT06995404
Comparison of Modified Perichondral Approach Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block and Transversus Abdominal Plane Block in Analgesia Management Following Caesarean Section Surgery
NCT06185725
M-TAPA vs RSB in Midline Abdominal Incision Laparotomy
NCT07233629
Comparison of M-TAPA and TAP Blocks on Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Surgeries
NCT06483607
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
M-TAPA block
Patients had bilateral M-TAPA block with 0.25% bupivacaine (total volume of 40 ml) at the end of the surgery for postoperative pain control.
M-TAPA block
Following sterile conditions for bilateral M-TAPA block application, the transducer was inserted on the chondrium in the sagittal plane at the 9-10th rib level. Subsequently, a deep angle was created with the probe for visualization of the underside of the costochondrium. The sonovisible needle tip was placed just below the chondrium and saline (5 ml) was injected for site confirmation. After the confirmation, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered for each group for a total of 40 ml of local anesthetic. Blocks were applied using an 80 mm sonovisible needle with a 6-10 MHz linear probe under the guidance of a portable ultrasound. M-TAPA block with the same standard technique and drug dose was applied to the contralateral side for each group of M-TAPA patients.
TAP block
Patients had bilateral TAP block with 0.25% bupivacaine (total volume of 40 ml) at the end of the surgery for postoperative pain control.
TAP block
After the necessary sterilization conditions were established, the linear ultrasound probe was sterilely coated and placed in the middle of the iliac crest with the end limit of the ribs. Starting with skin, the layers in descending order, subcutaneous adipose tissue, external oblique muscle, internal oblique muscle, transversus abdominis muscle, and peritoneum were identified. As the tip of the 80 mm sonovisible needle passed through the muscular layers and fascia, a fascial click was felt and the needle was advanced with ultrasound in a controlled manner. After receiving the second click sensation (passage of the fascia of the internal oblique muscle), the location of the needle was fixed and frequently aspirated and applied to the plane so that 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was applied to each side. (40 ml in total)
Control
Control group patients were not subjected to any block or local infiltration anesthesia. Their postoperative pain was relieved with tramadol (intravenous) administration.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
M-TAPA block
Following sterile conditions for bilateral M-TAPA block application, the transducer was inserted on the chondrium in the sagittal plane at the 9-10th rib level. Subsequently, a deep angle was created with the probe for visualization of the underside of the costochondrium. The sonovisible needle tip was placed just below the chondrium and saline (5 ml) was injected for site confirmation. After the confirmation, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered for each group for a total of 40 ml of local anesthetic. Blocks were applied using an 80 mm sonovisible needle with a 6-10 MHz linear probe under the guidance of a portable ultrasound. M-TAPA block with the same standard technique and drug dose was applied to the contralateral side for each group of M-TAPA patients.
TAP block
After the necessary sterilization conditions were established, the linear ultrasound probe was sterilely coated and placed in the middle of the iliac crest with the end limit of the ribs. Starting with skin, the layers in descending order, subcutaneous adipose tissue, external oblique muscle, internal oblique muscle, transversus abdominis muscle, and peritoneum were identified. As the tip of the 80 mm sonovisible needle passed through the muscular layers and fascia, a fascial click was felt and the needle was advanced with ultrasound in a controlled manner. After receiving the second click sensation (passage of the fascia of the internal oblique muscle), the location of the needle was fixed and frequently aspirated and applied to the plane so that 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was applied to each side. (40 ml in total)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* patients with coagulopathy,
* patients with signs of infection at the block application site,
* patients using anticoagulants,
* patients with local anesthetic drug allergies,
* patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery,
* patients with unstable hemodynamics,
* patients who could not cooperate during postoperative pain assessment
35 Years
70 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cumhuriyet University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Oguz Gundogdu
Assisstant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Oğuz Gündoğdu
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sivas Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sivas Cumhuriyet University
Sivas, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
M-TAPA vs TAP block on TAH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.