Rectus Sheath Block and Local Wound Infiltration in Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomies

NCT ID: NCT06913205

Last Updated: 2025-04-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

145 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-25

Study Completion Date

2025-03-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Laparoscopic appendectomy surgeries are among the most commonly performed procedures in childhood. However, they are associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. Regional nerve block techniques are recommended for postoperative pain management. This research compared the two most frequently used methods: rectus sheath block and local wound infiltration.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Acute appendectomy surgeries are one of the most frequently performed surgeries in childhood. Minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgical methods are recommended, especially in abdominal surgeries, due to rapid wound healing, rapid recovery, less bleeding, and shorter hospital stays compared to open surgery. In addition to all these advantages of laparoscopic surgeries, postoperative somatic pain is expected to be less compared to open surgeries due to the small incisions in the abdominal wall. However, when the pain severity of children who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy was evaluated using the pain scoring scale, it was seen that the median pain scores were ≥7 in 5% of the children (severe pain) and ≥4 in 25% (moderate pain). Clinical practice guidelines also recommend the use of regional anesthesia and analgesia methods as part of multimodal analgesia in the prevention of intraoperative and postoperative pain. We also routinely use regional anesthesia and analgesia methods successfully and effectively in our daily practices in our clinic.

Rectus sheath blocks, which are known to be effective in midline incisions, and local anesthetic infiltrations of the wound site, which do not require special technical knowledge about regional anesthesia, are routinely applied in our clinic in every case. Although both methods provide clinical benefits, it is unknown which one is superior to the other.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Appendectomy, Laparoscopic Pediatric Anesthesia Nerve Block/Methods Regional Anesthesia Acute Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Rectus Sheath Block

Children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy with rectus sheath blocks

No interventions assigned to this group

Local infiltration

Children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy with local infiltration

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Older than 8 years
* Younger than 18 years
* Minimal invasive appendectomy (3 port)
* Consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria

* Younger than 8 years
* Older than 18 years
* Convert to open abdominal surgery
* Do not consent to participate
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bursa City Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hande Gurbuz

Assoc. Prof. MD. PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Health Sciences, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital

Bursa, Bursa, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hamill JK, Liley A, Hill AG. Rectus sheath block for laparoscopic appendicectomy: a randomized clinical trial. ANZ J Surg. 2015 Dec;85(12):951-6. doi: 10.1111/ans.12950. Epub 2015 Jan 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25581711 (View on PubMed)

Liu Y, Seipel C, Lopez ME, Nuchtern JG, Brandt ML, Fallon SC, Manyang PA, Tjia IM, Baijal RG, Watcha MF. A retrospective study of multimodal analgesic treatment after laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Dec;23(12):1187-92. doi: 10.1111/pan.12271. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24112856 (View on PubMed)

Tomecka MJ, Bortsov AV, Miller NR, Solano N, Narron J, McNaull PP, Ricketts KJ, Lupa CM, McLean SA. Substantial postoperative pain is common among children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Feb;22(2):130-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03711.x. Epub 2011 Sep 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21958060 (View on PubMed)

Gurbuz H, Karasu D, Dogan AK, Kilicarslan N. Rectus sheath blocks for pediatric laparoscopic appendicectomy. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Sep 29;25(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03364-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 41023777 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-KAEK-25 2021/08-20

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.