Comparison of Regional Block, Caudal Block and Wound Infiltration in Inguinal Hernitomy
NCT ID: NCT06386250
Last Updated: 2024-04-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-05
2020-01-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: The objective of the study was compare regional block, caudal block and wound infiltration for post-operative pain management in children undergoing inguinal herniotomy
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Regional Block, Wound Infiltration and Caudal Block for Pain Management in Children
NCT05969613
Comparison of Two Different Analgesic Regional Block Techniques in Pediatric Patients Undergoing a Hernia Repair
NCT05896072
Ultrasound-Guided Transversalis Fascia Plane Block Versus Caudal Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Inguinal Herniorrhaphy
NCT06725667
The Comparison of the Transversalis Fascia Plane Block With Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Block
NCT03520907
Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block in Children
NCT03811392
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
In group A, iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves were blocked by using 0.25% bupivacaine 2ml/kg of combined with skin infiltration of adrenaline 1:200 000.
regional block
In group A, iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves were blocked by using 0.25% bupivacaine 2ml/kg of combined with skin infiltration of adrenaline 1:200 000.
Caudal block
In group B 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5ml/Kg was infiltrated at the surgical site.
Epidural
In group C 0.25% Bupivacaine 1ml /kg was given into epidural space at L4-L5 or L5-S1.
Group B
In group B 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5ml/Kg was infiltrated at the surgical site.
regional block
In group A, iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves were blocked by using 0.25% bupivacaine 2ml/kg of combined with skin infiltration of adrenaline 1:200 000.
Caudal block
In group B 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5ml/Kg was infiltrated at the surgical site.
Epidural
In group C 0.25% Bupivacaine 1ml /kg was given into epidural space at L4-L5 or L5-S1.
Group C
In group C 0.25% Bupivacaine 1ml /kg was given into epidural space at L4-L5 or L5-S1.
regional block
In group A, iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves were blocked by using 0.25% bupivacaine 2ml/kg of combined with skin infiltration of adrenaline 1:200 000.
Caudal block
In group B 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5ml/Kg was infiltrated at the surgical site.
Epidural
In group C 0.25% Bupivacaine 1ml /kg was given into epidural space at L4-L5 or L5-S1.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
regional block
In group A, iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves were blocked by using 0.25% bupivacaine 2ml/kg of combined with skin infiltration of adrenaline 1:200 000.
Caudal block
In group B 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5ml/Kg was infiltrated at the surgical site.
Epidural
In group C 0.25% Bupivacaine 1ml /kg was given into epidural space at L4-L5 or L5-S1.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
.Irreducible, obstructed or strangulated hernia, documented on clinical examination.
3 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
King Edward Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Muhammad Sharif
PROFESSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Muhammad Sharif, FCPS
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
King edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital Lahore
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Muhammad Sharif
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.