Comparison Between the Caudal Block and Other Methods of Postoperative Pain Relief in Children Undergoing Circumcision

NCT ID: NCT06086106

Last Updated: 2023-10-17

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Total Enrollment: 90 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2023-05-01
• Study Completion Date: 2023-08-26

Brief Summary

Prospective, randomized, case-controlled trial study. Observation post-operatively:

Aims: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the caudal block CB with other methods of postoperative pain release.

Detailed Description

a study Sample size: all patients, for a total of 90 boys going for circumcision surgery. I was recruited over the course of four months, starting on 1 May 2023. The patients will be divided into three groups: A caudal block(CB), B systemic opioids, and C dorsal penile block (DPNB) Techniques used in pediatric surgeries to provide analgesia for penile surgery such as circumcision. All patients had operations and were observed, and the three groups were compared based on hemodynamic stability, pain scores, duration of sedation, analgesia need, and parental satisfaction. where the Face, Leg, Activity, and Cry Consolability (FLACC) pain scale and behaviors were used to observe and compare the three groups. Pain scores were recorded by separate anesthesiologists or nurses in the post-anesthesia care unit. All statistical work will be carried out using Spss version 27 (Spss Inc., Chicago, USA) and Prism GraphPad version 9.4.1 (GraphPad, San Diego, USA) The categorical and numerical variables and demographic data of three groups were collected and reviewed by two authors. the study has shown that the caudal block produces higher levels of analgesia and a longer period of pain release than the penile block, even if both methods help relieve pain during pediatric surgical procedures.

Conditions

Analgesia; Pain, Postoperative; Pain, Acute

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: CASE_CONTROL
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

group B systemic opioids for pain relive

systemic opioids belong to a class of analgesics, they act by attaching to opioid receptors in the brain and spinal cord. For relief of pain, they are frequently utilized in a variety of surgical procedures and can be given intravenously, and in intramuscular injections. Although opioids are considered highly effective in pain control, they can lead to several adverse effects, such as nausea, vertigo, and respiratory depression, some of which can be dangerous.

caudal block

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

The caudal block involves the injection of a local anesthetic Bupivacaine dose of 0.75 to 1 ml/kg the maximum volume was 10 mL with 0.25% concentration into the caudal epidural space, targeting the sacral nerve roots. to provide a high effect and duration of analgesia

Dorsal Penile Nerve Block DPNB

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

DPNB is A type of pain control post-operative, often performed as a circumferential infiltration of the root of the penis (ring block). Two skin wheals are raised at the dorsal base of the penis, one on each side just below and medial to the pubic spine. A 25-gauge, 37.5-mm needle is introduced on each side, and the bupivacaine (1 to 1.5 mL) maximum dose 2 ml concentration 0.25% for infants is injected superficially and deep along the lower border of the pubic ramus to anesthetize the dorsal nerve. For a complete ring of infiltration,

Systemic opioids

Intervention Type: DRUG

Systemic opioids belong to a class of analgesics, they act by attaching to opioid receptors in the brain and spinal cord. For relief of pain, they are frequently utilized in a variety of surgical procedures and can be given intravenously, and in intramuscular injections. Although opioids are considered highly effective in pain control, they can lead to several adverse effects, such as nausea, vertigo, and respiratory depression, some of which can be dangerous.

Interventions

caudal block

The caudal block involves the injection of a local anesthetic Bupivacaine dose of 0.75 to 1 ml/kg the maximum volume was 10 mL with 0.25% concentration into the caudal epidural space, targeting the sacral nerve roots. to provide a high effect and duration of analgesia

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Dorsal Penile Nerve Block DPNB

DPNB is A type of pain control post-operative, often performed as a circumferential infiltration of the root of the penis (ring block). Two skin wheals are raised at the dorsal base of the penis, one on each side just below and medial to the pubic spine. A 25-gauge, 37.5-mm needle is introduced on each side, and the bupivacaine (1 to 1.5 mL) maximum dose 2 ml concentration 0.25% for infants is injected superficially and deep along the lower border of the pubic ramus to anesthetize the dorsal nerve. For a complete ring of infiltration,

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Systemic opioids

Systemic opioids belong to a class of analgesics, they act by attaching to opioid receptors in the brain and spinal cord. For relief of pain, they are frequently utilized in a variety of surgical procedures and can be given intravenously, and in intramuscular injections. Although opioids are considered highly effective in pain control, they can lead to several adverse effects, such as nausea, vertigo, and respiratory depression, some of which can be dangerous.

Intervention Type: DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Regional anesthesia intervention; Regional anesthesia intervention.; opioids analgesic

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification one
• aged from three months up to three years

Exclusion Criteria

• allergic to local anesthetics,
• bleeding diatheses,
• coagulopathy,
• infection at the injection site,

• Minimum Eligible Age: 3 Months
• Maximum Eligible Age: 3 Years
• Eligible Sex: MALE
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Salmaniya Medical Complex

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Zeana gawe

Specialist Of Anesthesia

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Rashed A Albanna, consultant

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

salmanyia medical complex

Locations

Salmanyia Medical Complex

Manama, , Bahrain

Countries

Bahrain

References

Gawe ZA, Isa HM, Almashaur MM, Haider F, Almulla K. The Effect of Caudal Anesthesia Block on Perioperative Pain Control and Reduction of the Anesthetic Agent in Pediatric Infraumbilical Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial Study. Anesth Essays Res. 2022 Jul-Sep;16(3):301-306. doi: 10.4103/aer.aer_64_22. Epub 2022 Nov 2.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 36620118 (View on PubMed)

Sandeman DJ, Reiner D, Dilley AV, Bennett MH, Kelly KJ. A retrospective audit of three different regional anaesthetic techniques for circumcision in children. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 May;38(3):519-24. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1003800317.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 20514962 (View on PubMed)

Metzelder ML, Kuebler JF, Glueer S, Suempelmann R, Ure BM, Petersen C. Penile block is associated with less urinary retention than caudal anesthesia in distal hypospadia repair in children. World J Urol. 2010 Feb;28(1):87-91. doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0420-2. Epub 2009 May 23.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19466428 (View on PubMed)

Cyna AM, Middleton P. Caudal epidural block versus other methods of postoperative pain relief for circumcision in boys. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD003005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003005.pub2.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 18843636 (View on PubMed)

Ekstein M, Weinbroum AA, Ben-Chaim J, Amar E, Schvartz R, Klein Y, Bar-Yosef Y. Comparison of Caudal Block vs. Penile Block vs. Intravenous Fentanyl Only in Children Undergoing Penile Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Study. Front Pediatr. 2021 Mar 26;9:654015. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.654015. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 33842412 (View on PubMed)

Walker BJ, Long JB, Sathyamoorthy M, Birstler J, Wolf C, Bosenberg AT, Flack SH, Krane EJ, Sethna NF, Suresh S, Taenzer AH, Polaner DM, Martin L, Anderson C, Sunder R, Adams T, Martin L, Pankovich M, Sawardekar A, Birmingham P, Marcelino R, Ramarmurthi RJ, Szmuk P, Ungar GK, Lozano S, Boretsky K, Jain R, Matuszczak M, Petersen TR, Dillow J, Power R, Nguyen K, Lee BH, Chan L, Pineda J, Hutchins J, Mendoza K, Spisak K, Shah A, DelPizzo K, Dong N, Yalamanchili V, Venable C, Williams CA, Chaudahari R, Ohkawa S, Usljebrka H, Bhalla T, Vanzillotta PP, Apiliogullari S, Franklin AD, Ando A, Pestieau SR, Wright C, Rosenbloom J, Anderson T; Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network Investigators. Complications in Pediatric Regional Anesthesia: An Analysis of More than 100,000 Blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network. Anesthesiology. 2018 Oct;129(4):721-732. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002372.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 30074928 (View on PubMed)

Baird R, Guilbault MP, Tessier R, Ansermino JM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of caudal blockade versus alternative analgesic strategies for pediatric inguinal hernia repair. J Pediatr Surg. 2013 May;48(5):1077-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.02.030.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 23701786 (View on PubMed)

H G Salama, M H Elsersi, T S Shabana, J M Mahanna caudal block versus penile block for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing hypospadias repair, QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, Volume 113, Issue Supplement_1, March 2020, hcaa052.006

Reference Type: RESULT

Provided Documents

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Study Documents

Document Type: Individual Participant Data Set

This study was ethically approved by the Research and Research Ethics Committee Government Hospitals, Salmaniya Medical Complex (SMC), Kingdom of Bahrain, institution review board, (IRB) approval number: 70130623, which includes the use of patient data for research and educational purposes was obtained from all the patients/control's parents/guardians before the intervention. This study followed the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, and as revised in Edinburgh 2000.

View Document

Other Identifiers

70130623

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id