Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Penile Block For Analgesia In Pediatric Circumcision
NCT ID: NCT07321717
Last Updated: 2026-01-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-01
2026-04-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Caudal Block and Sacral Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia
NCT05688813
Comparison of the Effects of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Dorsal Penile Block on Postoperative Pain in Circumcision Procedures
NCT06843070
Analgesic Efficiency of Pudendal Nerve Block Versus Penil Block for Circumsion in Children
NCT03258255
Comparison of Caudal Block and Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia
NCT05284734
Assessment of Efficacy of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Rectal Biopsies
NCT06362811
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the analgesic effectiveness of sacral ESPB and PNB in children aged 1-12 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II undergoing circumcision surgery. Participants will be randomly allocated using a closed-envelope method to one of two groups. The PNB group will receive 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine via circumferential subcutaneous injection along the penoscrotal line. The sacral ESPB group will receive 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound (USG) guidance using an in-plane, cranio-caudal technique. All procedures will be performed by pediatric anesthesia faculty experienced in RA. Premedication will include intravenous (IV) midazolam 0.05 mg/kg and ketamine 0.5 mg/kg. General anesthesia (GA) will be induced with IV propofol 2-3 mg/kg, fentanyl 1 µg/kg, and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg, followed by endotracheal intubation and maintenance with sevoflurane 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). Intraoperative monitoring will include electrocardiography (ECG), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂), and non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP). Hemodynamic changes exceeding 20% from baseline will be treated with remifentanil infusion.
Blinding (Körleme): This study will be conducted using a double-blind design. The patients and the investigators responsible for postoperative pain assessment and data collection will be unaware of group allocation. Only the anesthesiologists performing the blocks will know which intervention (PNB or sacral ESPB) is administered to ensure patient safety. This approach minimizes bias and ensures objective evaluation of outcomes.
Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale, which ranges from 0 to 10 points. A higher FLACC score indicates more severe pain, while a lower score indicates less pain. Analgesic administration will follow a standardized protocol: FLACC ≤3 indicates sufficient analgesia; FLACC 4-6 will be treated with IV paracetamol 10 mg/kg; FLACC ≥7 will be treated with IV fentanyl 0.5 µg/kg in the recovery unit. On the ward, oral paracetamol 10 mg/kg or ibuprofen 10 mg/kg will be administered according to FLACC scores. Phone follow-up at 16 and 24 hours will monitor pain scores and rescue analgesic consumption.
The primary outcome is postoperative pain within the first 24 hours as measured by FLACC scores. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative analgesic consumption, time to first postoperative analgesic requirement, perioperative hemodynamic changes, time to first urination, parental satisfaction, and postoperative adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, or block-related complications.
This study aims to determine the optimal regional analgesic technique for pediatric circumcision surgery by comparing the efficacy, safety, and satisfaction outcomes of sacral ESPB and PNB.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Penile Nerve Block (PNB) group
Participants in this group will receive the standard penile nerve block prior to surgery. The block is performed by subcutaneous infiltration of 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine around the ventral penoscrotal junction and base of the penis. This is the standard clinical practice group used for comparison.
Penile Nerve Block (PNB)
Participants will receive the standard penile nerve block prior to surgery. 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine is infiltrated subcutaneously around the ventral penoscrotal junction and base of the penis. This serves as the standard comparator.
Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block (SESPB) group
Participants in this group will receive a sacral ESPB before circumcision surgery. The block is performed with 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance using an in-plane, craniocaudal approach while the child is in the prone position. This is the investigational intervention being studied for analgesic effectiveness and safety.
Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block
Participants will receive a sacral ESPB prior to circumcision surgery. 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected under ultrasound guidance using an in-plane, craniocaudal approach while the child is in the prone position. This is the investigational procedure being studied for analgesic effectiveness and safety.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block
Participants will receive a sacral ESPB prior to circumcision surgery. 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected under ultrasound guidance using an in-plane, craniocaudal approach while the child is in the prone position. This is the investigational procedure being studied for analgesic effectiveness and safety.
Penile Nerve Block (PNB)
Participants will receive the standard penile nerve block prior to surgery. 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine is infiltrated subcutaneously around the ventral penoscrotal junction and base of the penis. This serves as the standard comparator.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for circumcision surgery
* Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
* Written informed consent obtained from both the participant (when appropriate) and their parents or legal guardians
Exclusion Criteria
* Undergoing circumcision combined with other surgical procedures
* Presence of neurological deficits
* History of bleeding diathesis
* Allergy to local anesthetic (LA) drugs
* Redness or infection at the injection site
* Presence of congenital sacral anomalies
* Mental retardation
* Psychiatric disorders or kidney disease
* Refusal to participate in the study
1 Year
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Münevver Kayhan
Lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Munevver Kayhan
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medicine of Faculty
Pinar Kendigelen
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medicine of Faculty
Ayse Cigdem Tutuncu, Professor Doctor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medicine of Faculty
Ali Ekber Hakalmaz, Lecturer Doctor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medicine of Faculty
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medicine of Faculty
Bakırköy, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ctf-sakral sünnet-03
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.