Comparison of Caudal Block and Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia
NCT ID: NCT05284734
Last Updated: 2022-03-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-01
2021-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Caudal Block and Sacral Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia
NCT05688813
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Caudal Epidural Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery
NCT07286786
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Fascia Transversalis Plan Block and Caudal Epidural Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Orchiopexy
NCT07006844
Caudal Epidural Block Versus Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block for Pediatric Circumcision
NCT04268511
Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Penile Block For Analgesia In Pediatric Circumcision
NCT07321717
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Caudal block group
A 22 gauge 50 mm echogenic block needle placed through the sacrococcygeal membrane into the sacral canal in the longitudinal position, using the in-plane technique Negative aspiration was then performed 0.125% bupivacaine at a dose of 1 ml/kg was administered
Regional anesthesia intervention
Ultrasound-guided caudal and erector spinae blocks were administered
Erector spinae block group
The erector spinae muscle and the transverse process were identified, and a 22 G, 80 mm echogenic block needle was advanced towards the transverse process until contact. Following hydrodissection, 1 ml/kg of 0.125% bupivacaine was injected deep into the erector spinae muscle
Regional anesthesia intervention
Ultrasound-guided caudal and erector spinae blocks were administered
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Regional anesthesia intervention
Ultrasound-guided caudal and erector spinae blocks were administered
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-II group
* Scheduled for circumcision and unilateral lower abdominal surgery at the same session
* Able to communicate in Turkish
* Willing to participate to the study (parents and children)
Exclusion Criteria
* A neurological deficit, bleeding diathesis, or a history of local anesthetic allergy; an infection or redness in the injection area, congenital lumbar anomaly, liver and/or kidney disorder, a psychiatric disorder, mental retardation, or communication problems detected during examination
* Unwilling to to participate to the study ((parents or children)
1 Year
7 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Volkan Ozen
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Volkan Özen, Asso.Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tulgar S, Selvi O, Senturk O, Serifsoy TE, Thomas DT. Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block: Indications, Complications, and Effects on Acute and Chronic Pain Based on a Single-center Experience. Cureus. 2019 Jan 2;11(1):e3815. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3815.
Ozen V, Yigit D. A Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Dorsal Penile Nerve Block and Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block in Circumcision. Urol Int. 2020;104(11-12):871-877. doi: 10.1159/000509173. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
Ozen V, Yigit D. Caudal epidural block versus ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block for pediatric distal hypospadias surgery: A prospective, observational study. J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Aug;16(4):438.e1-438.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.05.009. Epub 2020 May 20.
Ozen V, Turan EI, Kirdan T, Ayas TA, Erten E, Karacalar S. Erector spinae plane block as an alternative to caudal block in concurrent pediatric urologic and inguinal surgery: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Apr 11;104(15):e42109. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042109.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021.42
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.