Caudal Epidural Block Versus Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block for Pediatric Circumcision
NCT ID: NCT04268511
Last Updated: 2020-08-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-08-01
2019-12-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Caudal Block and Sacral Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia
NCT05688813
Analgesic Efficiency of Pudendal Nerve Block Versus Penil Block for Circumsion in Children
NCT03258255
Comparison of Caudal Block and Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia
NCT05284734
Pudendal Block Versus Caudal Block for Hypospadias
NCT02390388
Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Penile Block For Analgesia In Pediatric Circumcision
NCT07321717
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Caudal epidural block group
Linear ultrasound probe and the sacral hiatus at the sacral cornu level was visualized using an out-of-plane transverse view at 5-10 megahertz . The linear probe was then rotated 90 degrees and placed longitudinally in the midline to evaluate the sacral cornus, sacrococcygeal ligament and sacral bone.
Caudal epidural block group
The linear probe of ultrasound was then rotated 90 degrees and placed longitudinally in the midline to evaluate the sacral cornus, sacrococcygeal ligament and sacral bone. A 22 Gauge 50 mm echogenic block needle was advanced
Pudendal nerve block group
The long axis of the ultrasound probe was positioned on a horizontal line connecting the ischial tuberosity that had been previously located by palpation to the anus. The ischial tuberosity could be easily identified as a hypoechoic area that is bounded superiorly by a hyperechoic line. The probe was then moved medially on the same axis until the rectum appeared as another hypoechoic area.
Pudendal nerve block group
A 22 Gauge 50 mm insulated needle was then introduced in the anterior-posterior direction at the middle of the ultrasound probe's superior edge with an out-of-plane approach and using an inclination of 15° in the sagittal plane. The needle tip's position was identified by direct visualization using the movement of adjacent anatomical structures.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Caudal epidural block group
The linear probe of ultrasound was then rotated 90 degrees and placed longitudinally in the midline to evaluate the sacral cornus, sacrococcygeal ligament and sacral bone. A 22 Gauge 50 mm echogenic block needle was advanced
Pudendal nerve block group
A 22 Gauge 50 mm insulated needle was then introduced in the anterior-posterior direction at the middle of the ultrasound probe's superior edge with an out-of-plane approach and using an inclination of 15° in the sagittal plane. The needle tip's position was identified by direct visualization using the movement of adjacent anatomical structures.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-II group
* Scheduled for circumcision
* Able to communicate in Turkish
* Willing to participate to the study (parents and children)
Exclusion Criteria
* Neurological deficit
* Bleeding diathesis
* History of local anesthetic allergy
* Current infection or redness in the region to be injected
* Congenital lower back anomaly
* Liver disease
* Psychiatric disorder
* Mental retardation
* Communication problem
* Refusal to participate in the study.
4 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Volkan Ozen
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Volkan Ozen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Şişli, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tutuncu AC, Kendigelen P, Ashyyeralyeva G, Altintas F, Emre S, Ozcan R, Kaya G. Pudendal Nerve Block Versus Penile Nerve Block in Children Undergoing Circumcision. Urol J. 2018 May 3;15(3):109-115. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4292.
Gaudet-Ferrand I, De La Arena P, Bringuier S, Raux O, Hertz L, Kalfa N, Sola C, Dadure C. Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block in children: A new technique of ultrasound-guided transperineal approach. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Jan;28(1):53-58. doi: 10.1111/pan.13286. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
Kendigelen P, Tutuncu AC, Emre S, Altindas F, Kaya G. Pudendal Versus Caudal Block in Children Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):610-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000447.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1374
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.