Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound Guided Errector Spinae Plane Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block in Pediatric Open Renal Surgeries.
NCT ID: NCT05289401
Last Updated: 2022-03-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-01
2022-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block for Open Renal Surgeries in Children
NCT05386121
Erector Spinae Block Versus Caudal Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Pediatric Cancer Patients
NCT05153720
Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Intra Muscular Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Trans Muscular Quadratus Lumborum Block for Peri-Operative Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries in Pediatric Patients. A Comparative Controlled Randomized Study.
NCT04029987
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block For Postoperative Pain ReliefFollowing Laparoscopic Nephrectomy
NCT06655298
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block Versus Thoracic Para-vertebral Block Versus Quadratus Lamborum Block in Open Renal Surgeries
NCT05890248
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Neuraxial analgesia is usually required in these operations in combination with general anesthesia. Neuraxial analgesia decreases morbidity, mortality, opiate exposure, shortens post anesthesia recovery room time and hospital stay. However, it is usually associated with many complications as urinary retention and excessive motor block.
Caudal block is the most commonly used neuraxial anesthesia in pediatric patients. It can be used for analgesia in different renal surgeries providing adequate pain relief in the post- operative period .
Paediatric regional anaesthesia (PRA) is one of the most valuable and safe tools to treat perioperative pain and is an essential part of modern anaesthetic practice. It offers many advantages to both the patient and the hospital. It provides excellent pain relief and allows caregivers to use multimodal analgesic techniques and decrease the use of opioids without the complications of neuraxial anesthesia. Considerable progress has been made in the practice of PRA over the past few years including availability of information on safety and incorporation of ultrasound guidance. Novel regional anaesthesia (RA) techniques, especially the anterolateral and the posterolateral trunk blocks, show promise .
The erector spinae plane block (ESPB), one of the posterolateral trunk blocks, was first described by Forero et al. in 2016 and has been used by many anaesthesiologists for perioperative pain relief 4. Its mechanism of action is spreading of local anesthetic into multiple paravertebral spaces after injection into the interfascial space between the transverse process of the vertebrae and the erector spinae muscle. It can be used for postoperative analgesia for longer period and decrease the use of opioids with less complications in several pediatric surgeries including nephrectomy and pyeloplasty.
For this reason, ESPB efficacy will be compared to the caudal block efficacy seeking for a simple, safe and effective regional analgesic technique for renal surgeries in children.
Electrical Cardiometry is a method for the non-invasive determination of stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), stroke volume variation (SVV) and other hemodynamic parameters in adults, children, and neonates and it has been validated against "gold standard" methods such as thermodilution. Several potential mechanisms have been suggested for the action of the ESPB such as paravertebral spread as well as epidural spread of local anesthetic. These mechanisms raise the concern of the possible negative hemodynamic consequences of the ESPB which were not properly investigated .
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ESPB
Unilateral erector spinae block will be performed in the lateral position . 0.5 mL/Kg of bupivacaine 0.125% will be injected taking care not to exceed the maximum recommended dose (2 mg/kg of bupivacaine)
ultrasound guided blocks
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block in Pediatric
CB
caudal block performed in lateral position . bolus of 1.2 ml/Kg bupivacaine 0.125% .
ultrasound guided blocks
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block in Pediatric
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ultrasound guided blocks
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block in Pediatric
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American society of anesthesiologists classification (ASA) I and II .
* Patients undergoing unilateral open renal surgeries.
Exclusion Criteria
* Bleeding disorders (platelets count \< 150,000; INR \>1.5; PC\< 60%).
* Skin lesion, wounds or infection at the puncture site.
* Known allergy to local anesthetic drugs.
* Contraindications to neuraxial block as sepsis, severe aortic stenosis, increased intracranial pressure.
2 Years
6 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Chahenda Salem
M.Sc
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cairo University
Cairo, C, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MD-323-2020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.