Comparison Between the Quadratus Lumborum Block ,Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lower Abdominal Surgery
NCT ID: NCT05524038
Last Updated: 2025-08-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-01
2025-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Quadratus Lumborum Block (Transmuscular Approach) VS. TransversusAbdominus Plane Block(Unilateral Posterior Approach) for Perioperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Flank Incision Surgeries.
NCT03744923
Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block for Laparotomies
NCT04965194
Erector Spinae Block Versus Local Field Block in Lumbar Spine Surgeries
NCT05570565
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block vs Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block
NCT05596227
Erectae Spinae Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesis in Lumbar Surgeries
NCT05123092
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Preoperative preparations and Premedication :•
Both groups will be assessed by history taking, careful examination ,and laboratory investigations like:
Complete blood count (CBC), coagulation profile:(prothrombin concentration(PC),Partial thromboplastin time(PTT),International Normalized Ratio(INR) ) , kidney function, liver function, ECG for patient \>40 years old or indicated cases, specific investigations to each disease
.•the investigators will teach the patients Visual Analogue Score (VAS) and train them.
Intra operative technique and management:
When patients reach Theater, standard American Society of Anesthesiology(ASA) monitoring by (noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP), pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, and capnography) will be applied.
the investigators will allocate basal data for each patient like: heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure and arterial oxygen saturation will be recorded. Intravenous cannulation (IV) and intravenous fluid will be started. Intravenous Midazolam 0.03-0.05 mg/kg will be administered to all patients as premedication, Then the patients undergoing general anesthesia, At the first pre-oxygenation with O2100% for at least 3-5 min then the investigators will start Induction of anesthesia for both groups, general anesthesia will be induced with intravenous injection of fentanyl (1-2 µg/kg) and propofol (1, 5 - 2 mg/kg), and then atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) will be injected for endotracheal intubation. Mechanical ventilation will be maintained by controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) mode with tidal volume ( 6-8ml /kg) with oxygen and air (50:50) with target of EtCo2≈ 30-40 mmHg, anesthesia will be maintained with isoflurane 1%-2% , Incremental dose of atracurium (0.1 mg/kg) will be given every 20 min or when needed. In addition, 0.5μg/kg fentanyl will be given intraoperatively once needed (increase of heart rate or NIBP more than 20% of the basal records) After endotracheal intubation and finishing the operation before awakening of patients the anesthesiologist will perform either the (QL) block technique or the (ESPB) block technique.
Statistical analysis:
The collected data will be organized, tabulated and statistically analyzed using SPSS software statistical computer package version 22 (SPSS Inc, USA). For quantitative data, the mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range will be calculated. Independent-t test or Mann-Whitney U test, when appropriate, will be used as a test of significance. Qualitative data will be presented as number and percentages, chi square (χ2) will be used as a test of significance. For interpretation of results of tests of significance, significance will be adopted at P ≤ 0.05.
Sample size was calculated using (G power version 3). Minimal sample size of patients was 20 in each group needed to get power level 0.90, alpha level 0.05 (two tailed) and effect size of 1.08 for the overall dose of morphine. To overcome problem of loss of follow up, calculated sample size was increased by 20% to reach 24 in each group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
2. (ESB) group
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
(QL) group
In (QL) group, (lateral Approach) :patient receive this block with 20 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 4mg dexamethasone
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride
20mg of Bupivacaine hydrochloride as local anesthetic will be used in (QL) group and (ESB) group
Ultrasound device
high-frequency linear probe covered with sterile sheath Active Array L12-4 (8-13MHz) of an ultrasound machine (Philips clear vue350, Philips Healthcare, Andover MA01810, USA) for performing the blocks .
Dexamethasone
injection of 4mg dexamethasone in each block
echogenic needle
22- gauge, 50 mm echogenic needle (Stimuplex D; B Braun, Germany) for performing the blocks .
(ESB) group
In (ESB) group, Erector Spinae Plane Block: patient receive this block with 20 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 4mg dexamethasone
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride
20mg of Bupivacaine hydrochloride as local anesthetic will be used in (QL) group and (ESB) group
Ultrasound device
high-frequency linear probe covered with sterile sheath Active Array L12-4 (8-13MHz) of an ultrasound machine (Philips clear vue350, Philips Healthcare, Andover MA01810, USA) for performing the blocks .
Dexamethasone
injection of 4mg dexamethasone in each block
echogenic needle
22- gauge, 50 mm echogenic needle (Stimuplex D; B Braun, Germany) for performing the blocks .
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride
20mg of Bupivacaine hydrochloride as local anesthetic will be used in (QL) group and (ESB) group
Ultrasound device
high-frequency linear probe covered with sterile sheath Active Array L12-4 (8-13MHz) of an ultrasound machine (Philips clear vue350, Philips Healthcare, Andover MA01810, USA) for performing the blocks .
Dexamethasone
injection of 4mg dexamethasone in each block
echogenic needle
22- gauge, 50 mm echogenic needle (Stimuplex D; B Braun, Germany) for performing the blocks .
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgeries
* ASA classification I, II.
* Ability to sign the consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Coagulation disorders.
* Skin lesions or infection at site of proposed needle.
* Known allergy to local anesthetics, or opioids.
* Patients suffering from neurological or mental disease.
* Opioid consumption 48 hours before the operation.
* Sever Obesity body mass index(BMI) \>35
* Difficulty in Ultrasonographic identification.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fayoum University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rana Ahmed Abdelghaffar
lecturer of anesthesiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
rana A. Abdelghaffar, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
faculty of medicine ,Fayum university
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fayoum University hospital
Al Fayyum, Fayoum Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
El-Boghdadly K, Pawa A. The erector spinae plane block: plane and simple. Anaesthesia. 2017 Apr;72(4):434-438. doi: 10.1111/anae.13830. Epub 2017 Feb 11. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
D237
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.