Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Caudal Block for Pediatric Postoperative Analgesia
NCT ID: NCT03646630
Last Updated: 2022-09-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-02
2020-10-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Compared to Caudal Bupivacaine/ Neostigmine in Pediatric Lower Abdominal Surgeries
NCT04720287
Quadratus Lumborum vs Caudal Epidural Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Pediatric Patients for Upper Abdominal Surgeries
NCT05493085
Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Children
NCT04552548
Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Intra Muscular Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Trans Muscular Quadratus Lumborum Block for Peri-Operative Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries in Pediatric Patients. A Comparative Controlled Randomized Study.
NCT04029987
Ultrasound Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block
NCT05444309
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The ultrasound (US) has gained popularity among anesthesiologists performing regional anesthesia. Block success, and hence the efficacy would depend on the patient's anatomical variations and the anesthesiologist's skill level .
The use of ultrasound-guidance for peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) offers many advantages. Direct visualization of the nervous and surrounding structures decreases the incidence of complications e.g. inadvertent intraneural or intravascular injection. Direct real-time observation of the local anesthetics spread ensures more accurate deposition .This leads to faster onset and longer duration of block, thus improves block quality. It also allows dose reduction of local anesthetics . It has been shown that when peripheral nerves are adequately imaged by ultrasound, the simultaneous use of the nerve stimulator offers no further advantages.
Following ethical committee approval of Anesthesia department, Fayoum University and obtaining informed consent from parents of each patient, fifty two patients will be randomized into 2 study groups. Each group contains 26 patients.
Methodology:
Preoperative Assessment:
All patients will be assessed clinically and investigated for exclusion of any of the above mentioned contraindications.
Operating Room Preparation \& Equipment:
The ultrasound used will be Sonosite M Turbo (USA), the scanning probe will be the linear multi-frequency 13-6 MHz transducer (L25x13-6 MHz linear array). The needle used will be the stimuplex D needles manufactured by B Braun (Germany).
Perioperative Management:
All patients will be premedicated with IM midazolam 0.2 mg/kg and atropine 0.02 mg/kg. Perioperative monitoring will include continuous ECG, pulse oximetry, non-invasive arterial blood pressure, and temperature monitoring.
Inhalational induction of general anesthesia (GA) will be performed with a face mask using sevoflurane 8% and 50% oxygen in air, and then an intravenous (IV) cannula will be inserted. Fentanyl will be administered intravenously at 1 μg/kg, and a laryngeal mask airway (Intavent - Orthofix, Maidenhead, United Kingdom) will be used to secure the upper airway, with the patient kept spontaneously breathing. Anesthesia will be maintained with Isoflurane and 50% oxygen in air.
Surgery will be allowed to begin 10 minutes after block application. At the end of surgery, acetaminophen 15 mg/kg IV will be administered to all patients. Any complications occurring during the procedure will be recorded.
After completion of surgical procedure and emergence from anesthesia the patient will be referred to PACU. Quality of analgesia will be assessed using a FLACC scale at 30 minutes and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Diclofenac sodium 1 mg/kg rectally will be given as rescue analgesia for patients in all study groups in PACU if FLACC scale \> 4. Parents will be informed about the pain evaluation, and when patients had pain at home, parents will be instructed to give oral paracetamol 30 mg/kg. The anesthesiologist will record data received from the parents over the phone.
Statistical Analysis Sample size was calculated using the G\* Power software version 3.1.7 analysis program (Heinirch Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany) before the study. Depending on previous similar research with calculated effect size (d) 0.85, two tails (two sided), type 1 error 0.05 and increasing power of study to 90%, it was determined that each group should include at least 26 subject to obtain significant statistical value.
Collected data will be computerized and analyzed using statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 16. The results will be expressed as number and percentages for qualitative variables, mean, standard deviation and range for continuous data, median and inter-quartile range for quantitative discrete variables and scores.
To compare between groups, the chi-square will be used for qualitative variables, student t rest for comparing quantitative continuous variables between 2 groups, Mann Whitney U test to compare scores between 2 groups. Probability (P) value of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Quadratus Lumborum Block (QL)
Patients will be placed in the lateral position,The high-frequency linear probe will be placed on the lateral abdomen, slightly cephalic to the iliac crest. Once the QL muscle will be observed, the probe will be tilted slightly to the caudal direction, to show the largest slice of the QL muscle, to confirm its posterior aspect. A 22-G block needle (Stimuplex D, Braun, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, and Tokyo) will be inserted in-plane, \~1 cm ventral to the probe. The needle tip will be advanced until it penetrates the posterior fascia of the QL muscle. A small amount of saline will be injected to confirm the correct position of the tip, between the QL muscle and the erector spinae and latissimus dorsi muscles (Posterior or QL block type 2), then a bolus of 0.5 ml/Kg bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected.
Quadratus Lumborum Block
Posterior or QL block type 2 , a bolus of 0.5 ml/Kg bupivacaine 0.25%
Caudal block (C)
After induction of general anesthesia, a lateral position is obtained with the upper hip flexed 90⁰ and the lower one only 45⁰. A line is drawn to connect the posterior superior iliac spines bilaterally and used as one side of an equilateral triangle; then the location of the sacral hiatus should be approximated. By palpating the sacral cornua as 2 bony prominences, the sacral hiatus could be identified as a dimple in between. A 22 gauge needle is inserted at 45 degrees to the sacrum and redirected if the posterior surface of sacral bone is contacted. Children will receive caudal block with 1 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25%.
Caudal Block
caudal block with 1 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25%.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Quadratus Lumborum Block
Posterior or QL block type 2 , a bolus of 0.5 ml/Kg bupivacaine 0.25%
Caudal Block
caudal block with 1 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25%.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II
* Lower abdominal surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Parent refusal
* History of allergic reactions to local anesthetics
* Rash or infection at the injection site
* Anatomical abnormality
* Bleeding disorders.
* History of cardiac, neurological, renal, hepatic diseases.
1 Year
7 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Fayoum University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Doaa Lotfy
Assistant Lecturer of Anesthesiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kareem M Nawwar, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Kasr ElAini Hospital, Faculty Of Medicine, Cairo Univerisity
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fayoum University hospital
El Fayoum Qesm, Faiyum Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kehlet H, Holte K. Effect of postoperative analgesia on surgical outcome. Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jul;87(1):62-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/87.1.62. No abstract available.
Willard FH, Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Danneels L, Schleip R. The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations. J Anat. 2012 Dec;221(6):507-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01511.x. Epub 2012 May 27.
Chakraborty A, Goswami J, Patro V. Ultrasound-guided continuous quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in a pediatric patient. A A Case Rep. 2015 Feb 1;4(3):34-6. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000090.
Liu SS, Ngeow J, John RS. Evidence basis for ultrasound-guided block characteristics: onset, quality, and duration. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;35(2 Suppl):S26-35. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181d266f0.
Griffin J, Nicholls B. Ultrasound in regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2010 Apr;65 Suppl 1:1-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06200.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
D141
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.