Analgesic Efficacy of Us Guided Fascia Iliaca Block Versus Caudal Block in Pediatric Graft Surgeries
NCT ID: NCT06427174
Last Updated: 2024-06-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-31
2026-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Study Between Caudal Epidural Block and Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Post Operative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Infraumblical Surgeries
NCT05117021
Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Caudal Block for Pediatric Postoperative Analgesia
NCT03646630
Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Caudal Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Hip and Proximal Femur Surgery in Pediatric Patients
NCT05157516
Comparison Between the Analgesic Effect of Fascia Transversalis Block vs Caudal Block
NCT07235475
Ultrasound Quadratus Lumborum Block Vs Fascia Iliaca Block in Pediatrics Undergoing Hip Surgery .
NCT05282849
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The objective of this study is to compare post operative analgesic effect and safety of fascia iliaca nerve block versus caudal block in pediatric patient undergoing a graft surgery .
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Fascia iliaca group
For the group who will receive the fascia iliaca block …. After induction of the general anesthesia and before skin incision, fascia iliaca block will be performed in the patient while he is in the supine position after sterilization of skin over the groin area at the side from which split thickness graft will be taken, high frequency ultrasound probe
Fascia iliaca block
For the group who will receive the fascia iliaca block …. After induction of the general anesthesia and before skin incision, fascia iliaca block will be performed in the patient while he is in the supine position
Caudal block
And the second group will receive the caudal block, we use bupivacaine 0.5 mg / kg.
With the patient in the left lateral decubitus position and the hips and knees flexed, the sacral hiatus can be identified .First of all, the posterior superior iliac spines are palpated via anatomical landmarks, the line between both spines (Tuffier's line) representing the base of an equilateral triangle the tip of which indicates the position of the sacral hiatus. The sacrococcygeal ligament can be palpated between the two sacral cornua, which is where the needle should penetrate the skin at an approximate 45° angle. Once the ligament has been passed, a flatter angle is adjusted by descending the needle before it can be advanced to the correct final position.
Caudal block
second group will receive the caudal block, we use bupivacaine 0.5 mg / kg.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fascia iliaca block
For the group who will receive the fascia iliaca block …. After induction of the general anesthesia and before skin incision, fascia iliaca block will be performed in the patient while he is in the supine position
Caudal block
second group will receive the caudal block, we use bupivacaine 0.5 mg / kg.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2 Years
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Atef Ahmed
Dr
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mohamed Ta Mohamed
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lecturer doctor
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wiegele M, Marhofer P, Lonnqvist PA. Caudal epidural blocks in paediatric patients: a review and practical considerations. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):509-517. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.030. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
Bromage PR. A comparison of the hydrochloride salts of lignocaine and prilocaine for epidural analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 1965 Oct;37(10):753-61. doi: 10.1093/bja/37.10.753. No abstract available.
Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O'Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138.
Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997 May-Jun;23(3):293-7.
Suresh S, Ecoffey C, Bosenberg A, Lonnqvist PA, de Oliveira GS Jr, de Leon Casasola O, de Andres J, Ivani G. The European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy/American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Recommendations on Local Anesthetics and Adjuvants Dosage in Pediatric Regional Anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb;43(2):211-216. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000702.
Shteynberg A, Riina LH, Glickman LT, Meringolo JN, Simpson RL. Ultrasound guided lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block: safe and simple anesthesia for harvesting skin grafts. Burns. 2013 Feb;39(1):146-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 May 30.
Shank ES, Martyn JA, Donelan MB, Perrone A, Firth PG, Driscoll DN. Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia for Pediatric Burn Reconstructive Surgery: A Prospective Study. J Burn Care Res. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):e213-7. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000174.
Sinha S, Schreiner AJ, Biernaskie J, Nickerson D, Gabriel VA. Treating pain on skin graft donor sites: Review and clinical recommendations. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Nov;83(5):954-964. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001615.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FB vs CB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.