Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects of RSB and CEB in Pediatric Patients Scheduled for Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing
NCT ID: NCT07147062
Last Updated: 2025-09-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
65 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-08
2026-02-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
By providing effective pain control, nerve blocks reduce postoperative opioid requirements, thereby minimising opioid-related adverse effects and lowering the risk of pulmonary and cardiovascular complications.
This study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of rectus sheath block and caudal epidural block in pediatric patients undergoing PIRS.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Two Different Analgesic Regional Block Techniques in Pediatric Patients Undergoing a Hernia Repair
NCT05896072
Effects of Erector Spinae Plane and Caudal Block on Postoperative Stress Response
NCT05633173
Caudal Block and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT05286190
Caudal Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Block in Pediatric Patient
NCT03258736
Comparison of Two Plane Blocks Used in Open Ventral Hernia Repair Operations
NCT07163026
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Rectus Sheath Block
Using an in-plane approach from cephalad to caudal, a 22G, 50-mm needle will be advanced through the subcutaneous tissues, penetrating the anterior rectus sheath and progressing within the muscle until the needle tip contacts the posterior rectus sheath. After negative aspiration, a total volume of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine-distributed equally between both sides-will be injected bilaterally under direct ultrasound guidance.
Paracetamol at a dose of 10 mg/kg will be administered intraoperatively.
Rectus Sheath Block
A total volume of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine-distributed equally between both sides-will be injected bilaterally under direct ultrasound guidance.
Caudal Epidural Block
A 22G caudal epidural needle will be inserted at approximately a 45° angle toward the sacral hiatus, and the characteristic "click" sensation will be felt upon passing the sacrococcygeal ligament. The needle will then be advanced carefully in the cephalad direction, parallel to the longitudinal axis of the spinal canal. After confirming correct placement by negative aspiration, 1 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered.
Paracetamol at a dose of 10 mg/kg will be administered intraoperatively.
Caudal Epidural Block
A 22G caudal epidural needle will be inserted at approximately a 45° angle toward the sacral hiatus, and the characteristic "click" sensation will be felt upon passing the sacrococcygeal ligament. The needle will then be advanced carefully in the cephalad direction, parallel to the longitudinal axis of the spinal canal. After confirming correct placement by negative aspiration, 1 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rectus Sheath Block
A total volume of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine-distributed equally between both sides-will be injected bilaterally under direct ultrasound guidance.
Caudal Epidural Block
A 22G caudal epidural needle will be inserted at approximately a 45° angle toward the sacral hiatus, and the characteristic "click" sensation will be felt upon passing the sacrococcygeal ligament. The needle will then be advanced carefully in the cephalad direction, parallel to the longitudinal axis of the spinal canal. After confirming correct placement by negative aspiration, 1 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA physical status I-II
* Patients who underwent PIRS surgery in the operating room and received either a rectus sheath block or a caudal epidural block
Exclusion Criteria
* ASA physical status ≥ III
* History of bleeding diathesis
1 Year
8 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Elif Sule Ozdemir
Principal İnvestigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ankara Etlik City Hospital
Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AEŞH-EK-2025-170
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.