The Effect of Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block Versus Wound Infiltration in Gynecooncological Patients
NCT ID: NCT06095908
Last Updated: 2024-05-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-06-15
2023-11-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Postoperative Pain Relief After Major Abdominal Gynecological Surgery
NCT05845385
Ultrasound Guided Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane Block in Breast Cancer Surgeries
NCT04336917
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Gynaecological Cancer Surgery
NCT07077863
The Effect of Analgesia Methods Applied in Gynecological Cancer Surgeries on Postoperative Analgesia
NCT06382376
Comparing QLB Type I Block to Intraperitoneal Instillation Added to Wound Infiltration for Postoperative Cesarian Pain
NCT06129032
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All patients underwent preoperative evaluation one day before surgery and written informed consent was obtained for participation for the study. The procedure to be performed on the patients was planned in accordance with the randomization made by the statistician. The anesthesiologist who would perform the intervention participated in the study blindly to the drugs and groups. Patients in Group I underwent postoperative ultrasound-guided bilateral rectus sheath block at the T9-10 level with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (40 ml in total). For the patients in Group II (control group), 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was applied subcutaneously to each wound lip (40 ml in total). At the end of the surgery, 100 mg tramadol iv and paracetamol 1mg/kg iv were administered to both groups as analgesics.
Pain, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable), was queried by another anesthesiologist who was blind to the procedure. 2\*1 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory was routinely administered as an analgesic in the ward, but the first application time was planned by questioning the patient's pain. Rescue analgesia with tramadol was administered if the patient ranged the pain \>4 . Pain was measured at the 2nd, 6th, 12th and 24th hours postoperatively, and tramadol consumption was recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
'rectus sheath block'
Patients in Group I underwent postoperative USG-guided bilateral rectus sheath block at the T9-10 level with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (40 ml in total).
Bupivacain
Bupivacain administered with two different ways to the patients, postoperative pain recorded
'wound infiltration'
Group II (control group), 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was applied subcutaneously to each wound lip (40 ml in total).
Bupivacain
Bupivacain administered with two different ways to the patients, postoperative pain recorded
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bupivacain
Bupivacain administered with two different ways to the patients, postoperative pain recorded
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA II-III,
* between 18-65 years
Exclusion Criteria
* over 65 - under 18 years of age
* previous laparotomy
* allergy to local anesthetics
18 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Merve Bulun Yediyıldız
Specialist Dr
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kartal Dr Lutfi Kırdar City Hospital
Istanbul, Kartal, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DrLutfiKirdarANESTESIA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.