Quadratus Lumborum Block vs Erector Spinae Plane Block in Abdominal Hysterectomy
NCT ID: NCT05675657
Last Updated: 2023-10-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
81 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-15
2023-07-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Quadratus Lumborum Block vs Erector Spinae Plane Block in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT05465525
Transverse Abdominis Plane Block Versus Ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric Block For Analgesia Following Hysterectomy
NCT05656872
Ultrasound-guided Two Different Type Blocks for Pain Relief in Totalabdominal Hysterectomy
NCT04297046
Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Dual Transversus Abdominis Plane and Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia Following Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
NCT04382274
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block For Postoperative Analgesia After Abdominal Hysterectomy
NCT05541588
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Due to side effects of opioids such as nausea and vomiting, titration of opioid dosage for postoperative pain is difficult and effective postoperative analgesic regimes is needed. Ultrasound guided regional anesthesia techniques such as erector spinae plane block and quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain management has an acceleration in usage as ultrasound guidance makes the interventions safer and easier to perform, and they contribute to better pain control and pain experience. Ultrasound guided quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain management after abdominal surgery was firstly conceived by Blanco in 26th European Society of Regional Anesthesia Congress in 2007 as a variant of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Later on he reported posterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in 2013 which is known as QLB II. Børglum et. al described the transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TQL or QLB III) in 2013 which is frequently performed in abdominal wall surgeries. QLB III, transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TQL) and anterior quadratus lumborum block; these are all synonyms and refers to injection of local anesthetic into the anterior thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) which lays between quadratus lumborum muscle and psoas major muscle. Erector spinae plane block has being performed by clinicians for abdominal and thoracic surgeries since it was firstly described by Forero et al. in 2016 for analgesia in thoracic neuropathic pain. In this ultrasound guided technique local anesthetic is applied between the transverse process of the relevant thoracic or lumbar vertebrae and the erector spinae muscle which leads to the spread of the local anesthetic cephalad, caudally and through the paravertebral space. The investigators hypothesize that performing ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block will be more superior or equal to erector spinae plane block in providing postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
Patients will be operated under general anesthesia.
No Block
The patients will receive general anesthesia.
Quadratus Lumborum Block Group
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block type III bilaterally with 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% on each side, totally 60 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% followed by general anesthesia.
Quadratus Lumborum Block Type III
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block type III with 60 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% followed by general anesthesia.
Erector Spinae Plane Block Group
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block bilaterally with 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% on each side, totally 60 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% followed by general anesthesia.
Erector Spinae Plane Block
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block type III with 60 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% followed by general anesthesia.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No Block
The patients will receive general anesthesia.
Quadratus Lumborum Block Type III
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block type III with 60 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% followed by general anesthesia.
Erector Spinae Plane Block
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block type III with 60 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% followed by general anesthesia.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged between 18 and 75
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical score I or II
* Elective abdominal hysterectomy operation
Exclusion Criteria
* BMI \> 35 kg/m2
* Uncontrolled systemic disease
* \<18 age and \>75 age
* Unable to cooperate (mental retardation)
* Low cardiac capacity
* Hypersensitivity history to the agents to be used
* Coagulopathy
* Local infections
* Opioid addiction history
18 Years
75 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Namik Kemal University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Onur Baran
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Onur Baran, Asst. Prof.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Namik Kemal University
Ayhan Şahin, Asst. Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Namik Kemal University
Cavidan Arar, Prof.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Namik Kemal University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tekirdag Namik Kemal University
Tekirdağ, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Committee Opinion No 701: Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129(6):e155-e159. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002112.
Dewinter G, Teunkens A, Vermeulen K, Devroe S, Van Hemelrijck J, Meuleman C, Vergote I, Fieuws S, Van de Velde M, Rex S. Alizapride and ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled noninferiority study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Feb;33(2):96-103. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000288.
Ishio J, Komasawa N, Kido H, Minami T. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided posterior quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Sep;41:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
Sjovall S, Kokki M, Kokki H. Laparoscopic surgery: a narrative review of pharmacotherapy in pain management. Drugs. 2015 Nov;75(16):1867-89. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0482-y.
Sousa AM, Rosado GM, Neto Jde S, Guimaraes GM, Ashmawi HA. Magnesium sulfate improves postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:379-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 Jun 5.
Macias AA, Finneran JJ. Regional Anesthesia Techniques for Pain Management for Laparoscopic Surgery: a Review of the Current Literature. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022 Jan;26(1):33-42. doi: 10.1007/s11916-022-01000-6. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
Blanco R, Ansari T, Girgis E. Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain after caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Nov;32(11):812-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000299.
Gopal TVS. Ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum plane catheters: In the plane or out of it? Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;63(8):609-610. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_585_19. No abstract available.
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
Aksu C, Sen MC, Akay MA, Baydemir C, Gurkan Y. Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Quadratus Lumborum Block for pediatric lower abdominal surgery: A double blinded, prospective, and randomized trial. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Nov;57:24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
Tsui BCH, Fonseca A, Munshey F, McFadyen G, Caruso TJ. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block: A pooled review of 242 cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Mar;53:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
Chin KJ, Adhikary S, Sarwani N, Forero M. The analgesic efficacy of pre-operative bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in patients having ventral hernia repair. Anaesthesia. 2017 Apr;72(4):452-460. doi: 10.1111/anae.13814. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
Baran O, Sahin A, Arar C. Comparative efficacy of erector spinae plane and quadratus lumborum blocks in managing postoperative pain for total abdominal hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 25;103(43):e40313. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040313.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022.206.11.07
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.