Effects of Rhomboid Intercostal Block on Postoperative Pain Management and Chronic Pain Incidence in Mastectomies
NCT ID: NCT06756048
Last Updated: 2025-01-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-11-27
2024-11-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does the application of RIB reduce the prevalence of chronic pain at 3 months postoperatively? Does RIB improve acute pain control and reduce opioid consumption and related side effects in the first 24 hours postoperatively? Researchers will compare patients who receive RIB under general anesthesia to those who do not receive the block to determine its effectiveness in reducing chronic pain prevalence, acute pain scores, and opioid-related outcomes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block on Chronic Pain Incidence and Acute Pain Scores After Mastectomy
NCT06019325
Rhomboid Intercostal Block vs Erector Spina Plan Block for Peri-operative Analgesia in Mastectomy
NCT04259502
U/S Guided Rhomboid Intercostal Block Combined With Sub-Serratus Plane Block vs Type 2 Pectoral Nerve Block
NCT06274814
Rhomboid Intercostal Block Compared With Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Breast Cancer Surgeries
NCT06781346
Paravertebral Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Analgesia in Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT05080985
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary outcome is the prevalence of chronic pain at 3 months in patients undergoing mastectomy surgery. For patients reporting pain, additional parameters will be assessed, including:
Pain characteristics: location, frequency, intensity, and radiation. Factors that exacerbate or alleviate pain. Impact of pain on quality of life (measured on a 1-5 scale). Types and quantities of analgesics used. Secondary Outcome Measures
Acute Pain Scores:
Pain levels at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively at rest, measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).
Opioid Consumption and Side Effects:
Total opioid consumption (morphine and tramadol) within the first 24 hours postoperatively.
Incidence of opioid-related side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, and pruritus.
Patient Satisfaction and Sleep Quality:
Satisfaction with the analgesic method (e.g., very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied).
Sleep quality ratings (very good, good, moderate, poor, very poor). Willingness to use the same analgesic method again (yes/no).
Chronic Pain Impact on Daily Life (for patients with pain at 3 months):
Degree of limitation in physical activities, household/work tasks, and social life (scored on a scale from 0 = no limitation to 5 = constant limitation).
Impact on psychological well-being (scored on a scale from 0 = no impact to 5 = constant impact).
Study Design and Participants This prospective, randomized, controlled study will be conducted at Koç University Hospital. Participants will include 90 patients undergoing elective mastectomy surgery, aged 18-80 years, and classified as ASA I-III according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants.
The sample size calculation was based on a 2020 meta-analysis reporting a 59% prevalence of chronic pain at 3 months in patients without any regional block. Using select-statistics.co.uk software, with a two-proportion sample test, a 50% reduction in chronic pain prevalence was considered significant. With a p-value of 0.05 and 80% power, 43 patients per group were required. To increase robustness and account for potential dropouts, 45 patients per group (90 total) will be enrolled.
Randomization and Blinding: Participants will be randomized into two groups using randomizer.org software. RIB will be performed before induction of general anesthesia. No blinding will be performed due to the nature of the intervention.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Allocated to Intervention (Rhomboid Intercostal Block)
Group I: RIB In the first group (Group RIB), patients will receive a Rhomboid Intercostal Block immediately before the induction of general anesthesia. The procedure will be performed with the patient sitting upright and premedicated with anxiolytics. Using ultrasound guidance, a 50 mm block needle will be inserted into the auscultatory triangle (interfascial plane located lateral to the erector spinae muscle, beneath the rhomboid major, and over the intercostal nerves). A total of 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered at this site.
If the surgery is unilateral, the RIB will be applied only on the surgical side. For bilateral surgeries, 20 ml of bupivacaine will be administered to each side.
Rhomboid Intercostal Nerve Block
Following standard ASA monitoring, patients were positioned on the surgical table with their backs facing the operator. Skin antisepsis was achieved using povidone. A high-frequency 8-18 MHz linear ultrasound probe was used.
After palpating the rhomboid muscles and intercostal spaces at the T6-T7 levels, the medial border of the scapula and the vertebral column were identified. The ultrasound probe was placed horizontally along the medial border of the scapula. Using ultrasound guidance, the ribs, rhomboid muscles, intercostal muscles, and pleura were visualized. Once these anatomical structures were clearly identified, a 50 mm, 22G regional block needle was advanced in-plane from caudal to cranial under ultrasound guidance until the interfascial plane beneath the rhomboid muscles was reached and total of 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (Marcaine® 0.5%, AstraZeneca PLC, London, UK) was injected.
Allocated to No Intervention (Control Group)
Group II: Control Group In the second group (Control Group), patients will undergo the surgical procedure without receiving a Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB) or any other regional anesthesia technique. Standard general anesthesia protocols will be followed for these patients, and postoperative pain management will be conducted using systemic analgesics according to the institution's routine practice.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rhomboid Intercostal Nerve Block
Following standard ASA monitoring, patients were positioned on the surgical table with their backs facing the operator. Skin antisepsis was achieved using povidone. A high-frequency 8-18 MHz linear ultrasound probe was used.
After palpating the rhomboid muscles and intercostal spaces at the T6-T7 levels, the medial border of the scapula and the vertebral column were identified. The ultrasound probe was placed horizontally along the medial border of the scapula. Using ultrasound guidance, the ribs, rhomboid muscles, intercostal muscles, and pleura were visualized. Once these anatomical structures were clearly identified, a 50 mm, 22G regional block needle was advanced in-plane from caudal to cranial under ultrasound guidance until the interfascial plane beneath the rhomboid muscles was reached and total of 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (Marcaine® 0.5%, AstraZeneca PLC, London, UK) was injected.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with a BMI \> 35.
* Emergency cases.
* Patients with bleeding diathesis.
* Known allergy to medications used in the study.
* Patients with asthma.
* Patients diagnosed with chronic kidney failure.
* Pregnant or lactating patients.
* Patients with chronic opioid use.
* Patients with cooperation issues or inadequate communication ability.
* Male patients.
18 Years
80 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Koç University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kamil Darcin
Assoc. Prof.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yavuz Gürkan, Prof.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Koc University Medical School
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Koc University Hospital
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gartner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):1985-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1568.
Harkouk H, Fletcher D, Martinez V. Paravertebral block for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain after breast cancer surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Mar;46(3):251-257. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102040. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
Wang L, Cohen JC, Devasenapathy N, Hong BY, Kheyson S, Lu D, Oparin Y, Kennedy SA, Romerosa B, Arora N, Kwon HY, Jackson K, Prasad M, Jayasekera D, Li A, Guarna G, Natalwalla S, Couban RJ, Reid S, Khan JS, McGillion M, Busse JW. Prevalence and intensity of persistent post-surgical pain following breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Sep;125(3):346-357. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.088. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
Chen R, Su S, Shu H. Efficacy and safety of rhomboid intercostal block for analgesia in breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Mar 16;22(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01599-4.
Elsharkawy H, Saifullah T, Kolli S, Drake R. Rhomboid intercostal block. Anaesthesia. 2016 Jul;71(7):856-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.13498. No abstract available.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023.391.IRB1.138
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.