Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block, Versus Erector Spinae Facial Plane Blocks

NCT ID: NCT06989372

Last Updated: 2025-05-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-01

Study Completion Date

2025-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Mastectomy is currently the most effective treatment for breast cancers in women. postoperative pain management carries a high degree of difficulty, as the breast has complex innervation involving the intercostal (T1-T7), superficial cervical plexus (supraclavicular nerves) and brachial plexus .While severe acute pain is observed in approximately 40% of post-mastectomy patients, moderate-to-severe pain is observed in almost one-third of them .

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group I (SP)

serratus posterior superior block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

serratus posterior superior block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

patients were placed in the lateral decubitus position for SPSIPB. The blocks were performed under the guidance of ultrasonography (USG), a high-frequency linear probe (SonoSite HFL50x, 15-6 MHz, 55-mm broadband linear array, USA) transducer was placed at the level of the spine scapula in the transverse plane, and the upper medial border of the scapula, trapezius muscle, serratus posterior superior muscle (SPSM), 2nd and 3rd ribs were visualized. The ultrasound probe is rotated 90 degrees in a parasagittal orientation to identify the first rib. After its identification, the second and third ribs are confirmed. An 80 mm sono visible needle (type) was inserted in the caudocranial direction just medial to the scapula with the in-plane technique and driven between the 2nd and 3rd ribs targeting the inferior part of the SPSM. The target was confirmed by injecting the test dose with saline. Thirty ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was subsequently injected

Group II (ES)

erector spinae block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

erector spinae block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

US-guided ESPB, a commonly performed interfascial plane block, was first defined by Forero et al. (21). In this technique, LA is injected in the plane between the erector spinae muscles and the thoracic transverse processes. Thus, multiple thoracic levels are anesthetized by the LA spreading in a craniocaudal direction. The transducer was then placed approximately 3 cm lateral to the midline parasagittally. The T5 transverse process and the erector spinae, rhomboid major, trapezius muscles were viewed (i.e., from deep to superficial). The block needle was advanced in a craniocaudal direction using an in-plane approach through the trapezius, rhomboid major, and erector spinae muscles. After establishing contact with the hyperechoic transverse process, 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected in small aliquots after hydrodissection (2-3 mL, 0.9% NaCl) and checking for negative blood aspiration after every 5 mL of injection.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

serratus posterior superior block

patients were placed in the lateral decubitus position for SPSIPB. The blocks were performed under the guidance of ultrasonography (USG), a high-frequency linear probe (SonoSite HFL50x, 15-6 MHz, 55-mm broadband linear array, USA) transducer was placed at the level of the spine scapula in the transverse plane, and the upper medial border of the scapula, trapezius muscle, serratus posterior superior muscle (SPSM), 2nd and 3rd ribs were visualized. The ultrasound probe is rotated 90 degrees in a parasagittal orientation to identify the first rib. After its identification, the second and third ribs are confirmed. An 80 mm sono visible needle (type) was inserted in the caudocranial direction just medial to the scapula with the in-plane technique and driven between the 2nd and 3rd ribs targeting the inferior part of the SPSM. The target was confirmed by injecting the test dose with saline. Thirty ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was subsequently injected

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

erector spinae block

US-guided ESPB, a commonly performed interfascial plane block, was first defined by Forero et al. (21). In this technique, LA is injected in the plane between the erector spinae muscles and the thoracic transverse processes. Thus, multiple thoracic levels are anesthetized by the LA spreading in a craniocaudal direction. The transducer was then placed approximately 3 cm lateral to the midline parasagittally. The T5 transverse process and the erector spinae, rhomboid major, trapezius muscles were viewed (i.e., from deep to superficial). The block needle was advanced in a craniocaudal direction using an in-plane approach through the trapezius, rhomboid major, and erector spinae muscles. After establishing contact with the hyperechoic transverse process, 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected in small aliquots after hydrodissection (2-3 mL, 0.9% NaCl) and checking for negative blood aspiration after every 5 mL of injection.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age 18 to 65 years
* ASA classification I and II

Exclusion Criteria

* age below 18 or above 65 years
* ASA classification III or more
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohammed Shabayek

Lecturer of Anesthesia, ICU and pain management

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ain Shams university

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMASU R68/2025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.