Comparison of Different Volumes Spread of Erector Spinae Block in Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome Management
NCT ID: NCT05192278
Last Updated: 2022-01-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-12
2022-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Post-mastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is a common complication after breast cancer surgery and is often challenging to manage. It is estimated that PMPS occurs in 20%-44% of patients after breast surgery.
Adequate pain control for PMPS has become one of the most important goals and recently can achieve by multiple tools including multimodal analgesia and regional techniques.
Erector spinae block (ESB) is one of the new described regional techniques. Although its mechanism is not clear, the published data agree that it is promising block for chronic and acute pain and its simplicity and safety compared with thoracic epidural or bilateral paravertebral blocks.
ESB can be performed using a superficial approach between the large rhomboid muscle and the erector spinae muscle or the deep method beneath the erector spinae.
The use of the ESPB for chronic pain has recently expanded for various neuropathic pain conditions. Also, it reported with several volumes range from 10 to 30 ml of total volume.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Serratus Anterior Block on Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome
NCT05201963
Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block With Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Breast Surgery
NCT03579524
TPVB, PECSB, ESPB for Postmastectmy Pain
NCT05076773
Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block, Versus Erector Spinae Facial Plane Blocks
NCT06989372
Comparing Post-operative Analgesia After (PECS II) Block and (ESPB) in Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT06714682
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients more than 18 years old of both genders with PMPS not responding to medical treatments, and numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4 that ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain)., American society of Anesthesiology Physical Status class I and II, and Body mass index ˂ 30 were included in this study.
The exclusion criteria are patient refusal, local or systemic sepsis, coagulopathy, unstable cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, previous neurological deficits, history of psychiatric disorders, history of drug abuse, distorted local anatomy, and those who were allergic to the used medications were excluded from the study.
All the patients will inform about the numerical rating score (NRS) from zero to 10 (where 0 no pain, 10 the worst pain) to describe their pain.
Random selection of patients:
The study participants were randomly grouped on a scale of 1:1, using a computer-generated list of random numbers. The distribution results were sealed in an opaque envelope and kept by the study administrator. On the day of block, the study manager handed the envelope to the anesthesiologist who will perform the block.
Grouping:
Group A: receive ESR with 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 7 ml saline 0.9% (total 20 ml with bupivacaine 0.25%).
Group B: receive ESR with 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 15 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 12 ml saline 0.9% (total 30 ml with bupivacaine 0.25%).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 20 ml
receive ESB with 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 7 ml saline 0.9% (total 20 ml with bupivacaine 0.25%).
erector spinae block
The patients will do the procedure under fluoroscopic guidance. The patients were placed in prone position. After the identification of the T4 transverse process, the targeted injection site was anesthetized with 3-4 ml of 2% lidocaine. A 25-gauge spinal needle was advanced until it contacted the transverse process at the T4 level. Next, a solution of 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 7 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 10 ml saline 0.9% (group A) and in 20 ml saline 0.9% (group B) will injected. Then another photo will be taken with the fluoroscopy to determine the level of spread in each group. After finished, the patients will transfer to the post-operative care unit and will monitored for any complication for one hour.
Group 30 ml
receive ESB with 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 15 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 12 ml saline 0.9% (total 30 ml with bupivacaine 0.25%).
erector spinae block
The patients will do the procedure under fluoroscopic guidance. The patients were placed in prone position. After the identification of the T4 transverse process, the targeted injection site was anesthetized with 3-4 ml of 2% lidocaine. A 25-gauge spinal needle was advanced until it contacted the transverse process at the T4 level. Next, a solution of 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 7 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 10 ml saline 0.9% (group A) and in 20 ml saline 0.9% (group B) will injected. Then another photo will be taken with the fluoroscopy to determine the level of spread in each group. After finished, the patients will transfer to the post-operative care unit and will monitored for any complication for one hour.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
erector spinae block
The patients will do the procedure under fluoroscopic guidance. The patients were placed in prone position. After the identification of the T4 transverse process, the targeted injection site was anesthetized with 3-4 ml of 2% lidocaine. A 25-gauge spinal needle was advanced until it contacted the transverse process at the T4 level. Next, a solution of 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 7 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 10 ml saline 0.9% (group A) and in 20 ml saline 0.9% (group B) will injected. Then another photo will be taken with the fluoroscopy to determine the level of spread in each group. After finished, the patients will transfer to the post-operative care unit and will monitored for any complication for one hour.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* with post-mastectomy pain syndrome not responding to medical treatments,
* and numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4 that ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain).,
* American society of Anesthesiology Physical Status class I and II,
* and Body mass index ˂ 30 were included in this study
Exclusion Criteria
* local or systemic sepsis,
* coagulopathy,
* unstable cardiovascular
* and respiratory diseases,
* previous neurological deficits,
* history of psychiatric disorders,
* history of drug abuse,
* distorted local anatomy,
* and those who were allergic to the used medications
18 Years
70 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nevert Adel
assist. prof. of anesthesia and pain management
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nevert adel
Al Mansurah, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abdelghaffar NA, Amer GF. Comparison of different volumes spread of erector spinae block in postmastectomy pain syndrome management: a prospective randomized comparative study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Aug 22;23(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02239-1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R.21.11.1523
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.