Comparison of Different Volumes Spread of Erector Spinae Block in Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome Management

NCT ID: NCT05192278

Last Updated: 2022-01-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-12

Study Completion Date

2022-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cancer breast is one of the most common tumors among women and surgery is still the key for its management and cure. Post-mastectomy pain control is crucial as acute postoperative pain is a significant factor in the development of persistent chronic pain in the form of post-mastectomy pain syndrome.

Post-mastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is a common complication after breast cancer surgery and is often challenging to manage. It is estimated that PMPS occurs in 20%-44% of patients after breast surgery.

Adequate pain control for PMPS has become one of the most important goals and recently can achieve by multiple tools including multimodal analgesia and regional techniques.

Erector spinae block (ESB) is one of the new described regional techniques. Although its mechanism is not clear, the published data agree that it is promising block for chronic and acute pain and its simplicity and safety compared with thoracic epidural or bilateral paravertebral blocks.

ESB can be performed using a superficial approach between the large rhomboid muscle and the erector spinae muscle or the deep method beneath the erector spinae.

The use of the ESPB for chronic pain has recently expanded for various neuropathic pain conditions. Also, it reported with several volumes range from 10 to 30 ml of total volume.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This prospective randomized open comparative study will be conducted in pain clinic, Mansoura University Hospitals. The study will be approved by the Ethics Research Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University and will be carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. Informed written consent will be signed from every patient participating in this study after full description of all details of every aspect in this study.

Patients more than 18 years old of both genders with PMPS not responding to medical treatments, and numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4 that ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain)., American society of Anesthesiology Physical Status class I and II, and Body mass index ˂ 30 were included in this study.

The exclusion criteria are patient refusal, local or systemic sepsis, coagulopathy, unstable cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, previous neurological deficits, history of psychiatric disorders, history of drug abuse, distorted local anatomy, and those who were allergic to the used medications were excluded from the study.

All the patients will inform about the numerical rating score (NRS) from zero to 10 (where 0 no pain, 10 the worst pain) to describe their pain.

Random selection of patients:

The study participants were randomly grouped on a scale of 1:1, using a computer-generated list of random numbers. The distribution results were sealed in an opaque envelope and kept by the study administrator. On the day of block, the study manager handed the envelope to the anesthesiologist who will perform the block.

Grouping:

Group A: receive ESR with 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 7 ml saline 0.9% (total 20 ml with bupivacaine 0.25%).

Group B: receive ESR with 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 15 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 12 ml saline 0.9% (total 30 ml with bupivacaine 0.25%).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 20 ml

receive ESB with 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 7 ml saline 0.9% (total 20 ml with bupivacaine 0.25%).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

erector spinae block

Intervention Type OTHER

The patients will do the procedure under fluoroscopic guidance. The patients were placed in prone position. After the identification of the T4 transverse process, the targeted injection site was anesthetized with 3-4 ml of 2% lidocaine. A 25-gauge spinal needle was advanced until it contacted the transverse process at the T4 level. Next, a solution of 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 7 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 10 ml saline 0.9% (group A) and in 20 ml saline 0.9% (group B) will injected. Then another photo will be taken with the fluoroscopy to determine the level of spread in each group. After finished, the patients will transfer to the post-operative care unit and will monitored for any complication for one hour.

Group 30 ml

receive ESB with 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 15 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 12 ml saline 0.9% (total 30 ml with bupivacaine 0.25%).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

erector spinae block

Intervention Type OTHER

The patients will do the procedure under fluoroscopic guidance. The patients were placed in prone position. After the identification of the T4 transverse process, the targeted injection site was anesthetized with 3-4 ml of 2% lidocaine. A 25-gauge spinal needle was advanced until it contacted the transverse process at the T4 level. Next, a solution of 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 7 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 10 ml saline 0.9% (group A) and in 20 ml saline 0.9% (group B) will injected. Then another photo will be taken with the fluoroscopy to determine the level of spread in each group. After finished, the patients will transfer to the post-operative care unit and will monitored for any complication for one hour.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

erector spinae block

The patients will do the procedure under fluoroscopic guidance. The patients were placed in prone position. After the identification of the T4 transverse process, the targeted injection site was anesthetized with 3-4 ml of 2% lidocaine. A 25-gauge spinal needle was advanced until it contacted the transverse process at the T4 level. Next, a solution of 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 7 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 10 ml saline 0.9% (group A) and in 20 ml saline 0.9% (group B) will injected. Then another photo will be taken with the fluoroscopy to determine the level of spread in each group. After finished, the patients will transfer to the post-operative care unit and will monitored for any complication for one hour.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients more than 18 years old of both genders
* with post-mastectomy pain syndrome not responding to medical treatments,
* and numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4 that ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain).,
* American society of Anesthesiology Physical Status class I and II,
* and Body mass index ˂ 30 were included in this study

Exclusion Criteria

* patient refusal,
* local or systemic sepsis,
* coagulopathy,
* unstable cardiovascular
* and respiratory diseases,
* previous neurological deficits,
* history of psychiatric disorders,
* history of drug abuse,
* distorted local anatomy,
* and those who were allergic to the used medications
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nevert Adel

assist. prof. of anesthesia and pain management

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nevert adel

Al Mansurah, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

yahya m wahba, assist professor

Role: CONTACT

01211313554

ghada F Amer

Role: CONTACT

01008081333

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yahya M Wahba, MD

Role: primary

+201211313554

ghada F Amer, ass. prof.

Role: backup

01008081333

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abdelghaffar NA, Amer GF. Comparison of different volumes spread of erector spinae block in postmastectomy pain syndrome management: a prospective randomized comparative study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Aug 22;23(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02239-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37608269 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R.21.11.1523

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.