Comparison Between U\S Guided Erector Spinaeblock and Paravertebral Block on Acute and Chronic Post Mastectomy Pain
NCT ID: NCT04498234
Last Updated: 2023-10-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
108 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-05-01
2023-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Compare Analgesia Between MTP Block And ESPB in MRM
NCT06888258
Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Against Ultrasound Guided Serratus Anterior Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT04606147
Ultrasound-guided Multilevel Erectorspinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Prevention of Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome for Breast Cancer Patients
NCT06884852
Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block for Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT04732364
Comparison Between Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block for Mastectomy
NCT04372862
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GROUP(A) (CONTROL GROUP)
Patients will receive standard regimen of anesthesia .
ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine 0.25% And ultrasound guided Paraveretebral block with bupivacaine 0.25 %
One groupvwill receive 0.25% bupivacaine (20 ml ) into interfascial plane below erector spinae muscle at level of T4 and the other group willreceive (0.3 ml /kg ) 0.25% bubivicaine divided equially at each level of T2 , T4 and T6 at thoracic paravertebral space .
Group B
Patients will receive 0.25% bupivacaine (20 ml ) into interfascial plane below erector spinae muscle at level of T4.
ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine 0.25% And ultrasound guided Paraveretebral block with bupivacaine 0.25 %
One groupvwill receive 0.25% bupivacaine (20 ml ) into interfascial plane below erector spinae muscle at level of T4 and the other group willreceive (0.3 ml /kg ) 0.25% bubivicaine divided equially at each level of T2 , T4 and T6 at thoracic paravertebral space .
Group C
Patients will receive (0.3 ml /kg ) 0.25% bubivicaine divided equially at each level of T2 , T4 and T6 at thoracic paravertebral space .
ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine 0.25% And ultrasound guided Paraveretebral block with bupivacaine 0.25 %
One groupvwill receive 0.25% bupivacaine (20 ml ) into interfascial plane below erector spinae muscle at level of T4 and the other group willreceive (0.3 ml /kg ) 0.25% bubivicaine divided equially at each level of T2 , T4 and T6 at thoracic paravertebral space .
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine 0.25% And ultrasound guided Paraveretebral block with bupivacaine 0.25 %
One groupvwill receive 0.25% bupivacaine (20 ml ) into interfascial plane below erector spinae muscle at level of T4 and the other group willreceive (0.3 ml /kg ) 0.25% bubivicaine divided equially at each level of T2 , T4 and T6 at thoracic paravertebral space .
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age : 20 to 70 years old .
3. Scheduled for : either left or right modified radical mastectomy (MRM)
4. Physical status : American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II.
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
70 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
South Egypt Cancer Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Romany Gergis Naeem Gendy
assistant lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Romany G. Naeem, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
assistant lecturer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
South Egypt Cancer Institute
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Amr SA, Othman AH, Ahmed EH, Naeem RG, Kamal SM. Comparison between ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block and paravertebral block on acute and chronic post mastectomy pain after modified radical mastectomy: randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02810-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Romany SECI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.