Comparison Between U\S Guided Erector Spinaeblock and Paravertebral Block on Acute and Chronic Post Mastectomy Pain

NCT ID: NCT04498234

Last Updated: 2023-10-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

108 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-05-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

compare between ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block and ultrasound guided paravertebral block on acute and chronic post mastectomy pain

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Management of postoperative analgesia following breast surgery extending beyond a simple lumpectomy can sometimes be a challenge, especially when such surgery is being performed as a day-case procedure. Patients undergoing mastectomy have a very high possibility of developing postsurgical pain syndrome, as high as 20% to 50%.There has been some evidence to suggest regional analgesia techniques reduce the incidence of postsurgical pain in patients undergoing mastectomy. This underlines the importance of performing regional anaesthetic and analgesic techniques for postoperative analgesia following breast surgery.There are many techniques of regional analgesia as thorasic epidural block , paravertebral block , PECS1 block ,PECS2 block , and recently erector spinae plan block.Paravertebral blocks have superseded thoracic epidurals when it comes to choice of a regional anaesthesia technique to provide analgesia for breast surgery.The injection of local anaesthetic solution in the paravertebral space results in a unilateral block, which is sensory, motor, and sympathetic. The uptake of the local anaesthetic solution is enhanced due to the absence of fascial sheaths binding the spinal nerves.TPVB produces ipsilateral somatic and sympathetic nerve blockade due to a direct effect of the local anesthetic on the somatic and sympathetic nerves in the TPVS, extension into the intercostal space laterally, and the epidural space medially. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (US-ESP) block is a novel analgesic technique, in which local anaesthetic is injected into fascial plane deep to erector spinae muscle. It is possible to block the dorsal and ventral rami of the spinal nerve depending on the level of injection and amount of local anaesthetic injected. Erector spinae block (ESP) leads to effective post-operative analgesia where it is performed at T4-5 level for breast cancer and thoracic surgery , when performed bilaterally it has been reported to be as effective as thoracic epidural analgesia.The drug spreads in craniocaudal fashion over several levels as the erector spinae fascia extends from nuchal fascia cranially to the sacrum caudally. Forero et al. recently described US-ESP block for thoracic neuropathic pain. This block could be effective in both acute post-operative thoracic and abdominal surgeries and also neuropathic pain in these regions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Comparison Between Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Para-vertebral Block on Acute and Chronic Post Mastectomy Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GROUP(A) (CONTROL GROUP)

Patients will receive standard regimen of anesthesia .

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine 0.25% And ultrasound guided Paraveretebral block with bupivacaine 0.25 %

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

One groupvwill receive 0.25% bupivacaine (20 ml ) into interfascial plane below erector spinae muscle at level of T4 and the other group willreceive (0.3 ml /kg ) 0.25% bubivicaine divided equially at each level of T2 , T4 and T6 at thoracic paravertebral space .

Group B

Patients will receive 0.25% bupivacaine (20 ml ) into interfascial plane below erector spinae muscle at level of T4.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine 0.25% And ultrasound guided Paraveretebral block with bupivacaine 0.25 %

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

One groupvwill receive 0.25% bupivacaine (20 ml ) into interfascial plane below erector spinae muscle at level of T4 and the other group willreceive (0.3 ml /kg ) 0.25% bubivicaine divided equially at each level of T2 , T4 and T6 at thoracic paravertebral space .

Group C

Patients will receive (0.3 ml /kg ) 0.25% bubivicaine divided equially at each level of T2 , T4 and T6 at thoracic paravertebral space .

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine 0.25% And ultrasound guided Paraveretebral block with bupivacaine 0.25 %

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

One groupvwill receive 0.25% bupivacaine (20 ml ) into interfascial plane below erector spinae muscle at level of T4 and the other group willreceive (0.3 ml /kg ) 0.25% bubivicaine divided equially at each level of T2 , T4 and T6 at thoracic paravertebral space .

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine 0.25% And ultrasound guided Paraveretebral block with bupivacaine 0.25 %

One groupvwill receive 0.25% bupivacaine (20 ml ) into interfascial plane below erector spinae muscle at level of T4 and the other group willreceive (0.3 ml /kg ) 0.25% bubivicaine divided equially at each level of T2 , T4 and T6 at thoracic paravertebral space .

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Gender : female .
2. Age : 20 to 70 years old .
3. Scheduled for : either left or right modified radical mastectomy (MRM)
4. Physical status : American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II.

Exclusion Criteria

1-ASA \> III 2 -age\> 70 years old. 3-patients refusal to the procedure. 4-Infection of the skin at or near site of needle puncture. 5- Coagulopathy . 6- Drug hypersensitivity or allergy to the studied drugs. 7- Central or peripheral neuropthy . 8-Pre-operative opoid consumption ( within 24 hours preoperative ) 9- Anomalies of the vertebral column .
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

South Egypt Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Romany Gergis Naeem Gendy

assistant lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Romany G. Naeem, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

assistant lecturer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

South Egypt Cancer Institute

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Romany G. Naeem, MSc

Role: CONTACT

1006231332 ext. 0020

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Romany G. Naeem, MSc

Role: primary

1006231332 ext. 0020

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Amr SA, Othman AH, Ahmed EH, Naeem RG, Kamal SM. Comparison between ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block and paravertebral block on acute and chronic post mastectomy pain after modified radical mastectomy: randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02810-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39574036 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Romany SECI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.