Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Interfascial Plane Nerve Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Control After Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT ID: NCT06548646
Last Updated: 2025-01-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-01
2025-03-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Why This Study Is Important:
Breast cancer surgery can cause significant pain, and managing this pain is important for a quick recovery. Currently, pain is often managed with opioids, which can cause side effects like nausea and drowsiness. invistigators want to find a method that controls pain effectively with fewer side effects, helping patients recover faster and feel better.
Who Can Take Part:
Women aged 21 and older who are scheduled for a Modified Radical Mastectomy at Ain Shams University hospitals can participate in this study.
What Will Happen During the Study:
Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the Thoracic Interfascial Plane Block or the Erector Spinae Plane Block before surgery.
Pain levels will be measured using a numerical pain score from 1 to 10. Researchers will track the amount of pain medication needed, the time it takes to feel pain relief, and any side effects.
Other factors such as sleep quality, time to start walking again, and overall satisfaction with pain control will also be recorded.
What investigators hope to Learn:
Investigators hope to find out which nerve block provides better pain relief after surgery. By comparing TIPB and ESPB, with the aim to identify the method that:
Requires less additional pain medication Has fewer side effects Improves sleep quality and overall recovery Increases patient satisfaction
Significance:
This study could lead to better pain management strategies for breast cancer surgery, reducing the need for opioids and enhancing patient recovery and comfort.
Participation:
Participants will be monitored closely during and after the procedure to ensure their safety and well-being. The results of this study could help improve pain management for future patients undergoing similar surgeries.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Against Ultrasound Guided Serratus Anterior Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT04606147
Rhomboid Intercostal Block With Sub-Serratus Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Block
NCT07041762
Comparing the Quality of Analgesia With Pectoral Nerve Block and Serratus Plane Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT05224310
Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Pectoral Nerve Block II
NCT06188156
Analgesic Efficacy of U/S Retrolaminar Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block in MRM
NCT06322316
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methodology:
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups to receive either TIPB or ESPB. The randomization will ensure unbiased distribution of participants across both groups. The nerve blocks will be administered preoperatively under ultrasound guidance to ensure accurate placement and effectiveness.
Assessments and Measurements:
Pain levels will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at multiple time points postoperatively, including at rest and during movement. The primary outcome measure is the total amount of rescue pain medication required within the first 48 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include the time to first rescue analgesic, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, hemodynamic parameters, sleep quality, time to first ambulation, VAS scores for pain and nausea, and overall patient satisfaction.
Safety and Monitoring:
Participants will be monitored for adverse events, including complications related to the nerve block techniques. Hemodynamic parameters, such as blood pressure and heart rate, will be closely observed during the perioperative period to ensure patient safety.
Significance:
The findings from this study aim to identify a superior pain management strategy that minimizes opioid consumption, reduces side effects, and enhances recovery and patient satisfaction following MRM. If successful, the results could inform clinical practice and improve postoperative care for breast cancer patients.
This study is conducted at Ain Shams University hospitals and adheres to ethical guidelines to ensure the safety and well-being of all participants.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Thoracic Interfascial Plane Block
the Thoracic Interfascial Plane Block, which includes Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block and Serratus Intercostal Fascial Plane Block, is a peripheral nerve block that targets the intercostal nerve branches scattered throughout the chest and axilla
Thoracic Interfascial Plane Block
The Thoracic Interfascial Plane Block (TIPB) is a regional anesthesia technique used to manage postoperative pain, particularly in thoracic and breast surgeries. This block involves the injection of a local anesthetic into the fascial plane between the thoracic muscles, targeting the nerves that supply the chest wall and upper abdominal area. It includes Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block (PIFB) and Serratus Intercostal Fascial Plane Block (SIFB).
Erector Spinae Plane Block
Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is an anesthesia technique for providing effective analgesia during and after breast and abdominal surgery
Erector Spinae Plane Block
The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is a regional anesthesia technique used to manage pain, particularly in thoracic and abdominal surgeries. This block involves the injection of a local anesthetic into the plane between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse processes of the vertebrae.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Thoracic Interfascial Plane Block
The Thoracic Interfascial Plane Block (TIPB) is a regional anesthesia technique used to manage postoperative pain, particularly in thoracic and breast surgeries. This block involves the injection of a local anesthetic into the fascial plane between the thoracic muscles, targeting the nerves that supply the chest wall and upper abdominal area. It includes Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block (PIFB) and Serratus Intercostal Fascial Plane Block (SIFB).
Erector Spinae Plane Block
The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is a regional anesthesia technique used to manage pain, particularly in thoracic and abdominal surgeries. This block involves the injection of a local anesthetic into the plane between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse processes of the vertebrae.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II.
Exclusion Criteria
* Skin infections at the site of the needle puncture.
* Significant organ dysfunction (hepatic, renal, or cardiac dysfunction), coagulopathy or recent anticoagulant use, epilepsy.
* Patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnoea, pulmonary compromise .
21 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Safie ramez tewfeik abd el moneim
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Safie ramez tewfeik abd el moneim
Dr
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ainshams University Hospitals
Cairo, Abbasiya, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kaur U, Shamshery C, Agarwal A, Prakash N, Valiveru RC, Mishra P. Evaluation of postoperative pain in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy with pectoralis or serratus-intercostal fascial plane blocks. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020 Oct;73(5):425-433. doi: 10.4097/kja.20159. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
Hong B, Yoon SH, Youn AM, Kim BJ, Song S, Yoon Y. Thoracic interfascial nerve block for breast surgery in a pregnant woman: a case report. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017 Apr;70(2):209-212. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.209. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
Zhang H, Miao Y, Qu Z. Refining a great idea: the consolidation of PECS I, PECS II and serratus blocks into a single thoracic fascial plane block, the SAP block-a concern on the muscle pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Jun;45(6):480. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101042. Epub 2019 Oct 25. No abstract available.
Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
Boogaerts JG, Vanacker E, Seidel L, Albert A, Bardiau FM. Assessment of postoperative nausea using a visual analogue scale. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000 Apr;44(4):470-4. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440420.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MD178/2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.