Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Local Wound Infiltration in Breast Conservative Surgery

NCT ID: NCT07301840

Last Updated: 2025-12-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-08-21

Study Completion Date

2024-12-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Abstract

Background:

Postoperative pain management is a crucial component of patient care following breast conservative surgery. This study compares the efficacy of ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Local Wound Infiltration (LWI) in managing acute postoperative pain in these surgeries.

Objectives:

This randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial aims to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided ESPB and LWI in patients undergoing breast conservative surgery.

Patients and methods:

Adult female patients (aged 18-75, ASA II) scheduled for breast conservative surgery were randomly assigned to either the ESPB or LWI group. The primary outcome was total morphine consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included; intraoperative fentanyl consumption, hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate), time of first rescue analgesia, postoperative pain scores, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and patient satisfaction. Complications such as local anesthetic toxicity and respiratory depression were also assessed.

Key Words:

Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB), Local wound infiltration, Postoperative analgesia, Breast conservative surgery

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Local Wound Infiltration Erector Spina Plan Block Nerve Block/Methods Post Operative Analgesia Pain Management

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Erector Spinae Plane Block Local wound infiltration Postoperative analgesia Breast conservative surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized Double Blinded Comparative Study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1 (experimental group): will receive US guided ESPB

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Erector Spinae Plane Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Typical ESPB

Group 2 (controlled group): will receive local wound infiltration

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Local Wound Infiltration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Preemptive Local Wound Infiltration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Erector Spinae Plane Block

Typical ESPB

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local Wound Infiltration

Preemptive Local Wound Infiltration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age from 18 to 75 years.
* Genders eligible for study: females.
* ASA II.
* Patients scheduled for breast conservative surgery.
* Ability to provide informed consent or, if unable, consent obtained from a legal representative

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal.
* Inability to provide informed consent.
* ASA III-IV.
* Known sensitivity or contraindication to drug used in the study (local anesthetics, opioids).
* Pregnant or lactating women.
* History of psychological disorders and/or chronic pain. 25
* Contraindication to regional anesthesia e.g. local sepsis, pre- existing peripheral neuropathies and coagulopathy.
* Severe respiratory or cardiac disorders.
* Advanced liver or kidney disease.
* Male patients.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tasneem Hassan El-Tohamy

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Cancer Institute

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MS-433-2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id