The Efficacy and Safety of Landmark-guided Compared to Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Techniques for Analgesia in Female Patients After Breast Surgery.

NCT ID: NCT06246292

Last Updated: 2024-07-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

248 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-10

Study Completion Date

2024-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a technique that helps alleviate acute pain. It involves injecting local anesthetic between the erector spinae muscle (ESM) and the vertebra's transverse process (TP). This technique can be guided by ultrasound or anatomical landmarks, and it can be performed while the patient is lying down, sitting or on their side.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Ultrasound guidance has established itself as the norm for regional anesthesia procedures, enabling live visualization of anatomical structures and enhancing the precision and safety of needle insertion. Conversely, the blind technique relies on anatomical landmarks and the ability to palpate to direct needle insertion. Although the blind technique might provide simplicity and efficiency, uncertainties persist concerning its precision and possible associated risks. As the popularity of the ESPB increases, a relevant query emerges: Should it be conducted with ultrasound guidance or through a non-guided technique? This study was designed to validate the efficacy and safety of a landmark-guided ESPB technique compared to an ultrasound-guided ESPB technique for analgesia in breast surgery. The hypothesis was that the ultrasound and anatomical landmark techniques for ESPB would provide equivalent analgesia. The study's primary objective was to compare the success rate of both techniques. The secondary objectives were to compare the dermatomal block spread, analgesic effectiveness, and technique-related complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nerve Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

landmark guided ESPB technique

The ESPB was performed using the landmarks described by Vadera et al. (5). Before initiating the block procedure, the spinous process of the T4 vertebra and a point situated 3 cm to its side are marked at the appropriate level. The needle was inserted perpendicularly to the skin and advanced in all planes until it contacts the vertebra's transverse process. The depth at which the thoracic vertebra's transverse process lies from the skin can vary, ranging from 2 to 4 cm, contingent upon the individual's physique. The needle tip was positioned between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process. The volume of local anesthetics was injected in this plane.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Anatomical landmark-guided ESPB

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The ESPB is a truncal block guided by anatomical landmarks, involving the injection of local anesthetic beneath the erector spinae muscle (ESM), positioned between the ESM and the transverse process (TP) of the vertebra.

ultrasound-guided ESPB technique

The block was performed based on the original description by Forero et al. (2). A high-frequency linear transducer (MyLab 70 Xvision, Esaote SpA, Florence, Italy) was positioned in the parasagittal plane 2 cm lateral to the T4 vertebra. Once the transverse process and the overlying erector spinae muscle were visible on the ultrasound, the needle was introduced using the in-plane technique. The needle was inserted in the cranial-to-caudal direction until it reached the tip of the transverse process. Following a negative aspiration and a successful hydro dissection, the local anesthetic solution was injected beneath the erector spinae muscle's fascia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ultrasound-guided ESPB

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The ESPB is a truncal block guided by ultrasound, involving the injection of local anesthetic beneath the erector spinae muscle (ESM), positioned between the ESM and the transverse process (TP) of the vertebra.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound-guided ESPB

The ESPB is a truncal block guided by ultrasound, involving the injection of local anesthetic beneath the erector spinae muscle (ESM), positioned between the ESM and the transverse process (TP) of the vertebra.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anatomical landmark-guided ESPB

The ESPB is a truncal block guided by anatomical landmarks, involving the injection of local anesthetic beneath the erector spinae muscle (ESM), positioned between the ESM and the transverse process (TP) of the vertebra.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged 18 years or older.
* Patients had an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical score of I-II.
* Patients undergoing unilateral elective breast surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients had a contraindication to an ESPB (including coagulopathy, recent anticoagulant medication usage, or infection at the needle puncture site).
* Patients had a history of opioid addiction, preoperative opioid use, and allergies to study medications.
* Obesity (body mass index exceeding 35 kg/m²).
* If the placement of ESPB was not completed due to technique difficulties.
* Patients who expressed a lack of willingness to participate in the study were not considered eligible for participation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alexandria University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Islam elbardan, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Alexandria

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

faculty of medicine, Alexandria Unverisity

Alexandria, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB number: 00012098

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.