Comparison Between Retrolaminar Block Combined With Erector Spinae Plane Block, and Erector Spinae Plane Block Alone for Post-thoracotomy Pain
NCT ID: NCT05791539
Last Updated: 2023-08-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-02-02
2023-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Between Erector Spinae Plane Block And Retrolaminar Block In Patients Undergoing VATS.
NCT06021327
Regional Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
NCT05218746
Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Thoracotomy
NCT05507281
Comparing Different Regional Blocks for Analgesia After Off-pump Cardiac Surgery
NCT05763810
Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy
NCT04486014
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The surgical incision produces post-thoracotomy pain (PTP) via damage to the ribs and intercostal nerves, inflammation of the chest wall, pleura or pulmonary parenchyma cutting, and placement of the intercostal chest tube. Acute PTP inhibits the ability to breathe and cough normally. Numerous analgesic techniques are used to relieve PTP, including systemic opioids, regional techniques (such as paravertebral nerve blockade, intercostal nerve blockade, intrapleural analgesia, and epidural opioids with or without local analgesia), cryo-analgesia, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
Emerging research has shown that the novel erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can be employed as a simple and safe alternative analgesic technique for acute post-surgical, post-traumatic, and chronic neuropathic thoracic pain in adults.
ESPB was first reported in 2016 for ipsilateral thoracic analgesia. It was found to be a safe and effective block that can be performed by an emergency physician in the emergency department setting for addressing acute pain due to multiple rib fractures.
Retrolaminar block (RLB) was first reported in 2006 as an alternative approach to PVB. RLB is performed with US imaging or the landmark technique. The efficacy of continuous RLB has been reported for breast cancer surgery .
However, the efficacy of ESPB has been described in a greater number of clinical reports than has RLB: a rib fracture, breast surgery, thoracoscopic surgery, lumbar spinal surgery, and laparoscopic abdominal surgery. In contrast to RLB, most of the literature on ESPB reported the use of the single-shot technique (80.2%). The local anesthetic was postulated to infiltrate the ventral and dorsal rami of the spinal nerve. However, Ueshima et al. reported that ESPB could not provide adequate analgesia of the anterior branch of the intercostal nerve.
The rationale of the study is that to the best of our knowledge each of ESPB and RLB has limitations regarding sensory block and distribution so our hypothesis is combining both will provide more solid block regarding sensory distribution, time interval of the block efficacy, and postoperative morphine consumption in patients undergoing thoracic surgeries.
Few studies evaluated the efficacy of ultrasound (US) guided erector spinae plane block on post-thoracotomy analgesia, however for the best of our knowledge no one compared the effect of ultrasound (US) guided retrolaminar block combined with erector spinae plane block and ultrasound (US) guided erector spinae plane block alone in patients undergoing thoracic surgeries.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1 Erector spinae plane block
Group 1 (ESPB (control group): (n = 15) patients will receive preoperative US-guided ESPB on the operated side by 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25%.
Erector spinae plane block
Patients will be divided into 2 groups group 1 will receive US-guided ESPB and group 2 will receive US-guided ESPB + US-guided Retrolaminar plain block before induction of GA.
Group 2: Erector spinae plane block
US-guided ESPB with 10 ml bupivacaine 0.25% (n = 15) on the operated side.
Erector spinae plane block
Patients will be divided into 2 groups group 1 will receive US-guided ESPB and group 2 will receive US-guided ESPB + US-guided Retrolaminar plain block before induction of GA.
Retro laminar block
the US-guided retrolaminar block 10 ml bupivacaine 0.25% group: (n = 15) on the operated side.
erector spinae plane block + retrolaminar block
Patients will be divided into 2 groups group 1 will receive US-guided ESPB and group 2 will receive US-guided ESPB + US-guided Retrolaminar plain block before induction of GA.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Erector spinae plane block
Patients will be divided into 2 groups group 1 will receive US-guided ESPB and group 2 will receive US-guided ESPB + US-guided Retrolaminar plain block before induction of GA.
erector spinae plane block + retrolaminar block
Patients will be divided into 2 groups group 1 will receive US-guided ESPB and group 2 will receive US-guided ESPB + US-guided Retrolaminar plain block before induction of GA.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* body mass index (BMI) ranged between 20 and 40 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
* Sensitivity or contraindication to local anesthetic drugs.
* History of psychological disorders and/or chronic pain.
* Localized infection at the site of the block.
* Coagulopathies, patients on anticoagulants and antiplatelets, and significant liver or renal insufficiency
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
sherif Mamdouh Abbas
lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
sherif mamdouh, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cairo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cairo Unviersity
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MS-397-2022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.