Comparison Between Retrolaminar Block Combined With Erector Spinae Plane Block, and Erector Spinae Plane Block Alone for Post-thoracotomy Pain

NCT ID: NCT05791539

Last Updated: 2023-08-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-02

Study Completion Date

2023-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Post-thoracotomy pain is a challenging clinical problem that may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The current study tests two techniques of regional anaesthesia to control post thoracotomy pain

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Post-thoracotomy pain is a challenging clinical problem that may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

The surgical incision produces post-thoracotomy pain (PTP) via damage to the ribs and intercostal nerves, inflammation of the chest wall, pleura or pulmonary parenchyma cutting, and placement of the intercostal chest tube. Acute PTP inhibits the ability to breathe and cough normally. Numerous analgesic techniques are used to relieve PTP, including systemic opioids, regional techniques (such as paravertebral nerve blockade, intercostal nerve blockade, intrapleural analgesia, and epidural opioids with or without local analgesia), cryo-analgesia, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).

Emerging research has shown that the novel erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can be employed as a simple and safe alternative analgesic technique for acute post-surgical, post-traumatic, and chronic neuropathic thoracic pain in adults.

ESPB was first reported in 2016 for ipsilateral thoracic analgesia. It was found to be a safe and effective block that can be performed by an emergency physician in the emergency department setting for addressing acute pain due to multiple rib fractures.

Retrolaminar block (RLB) was first reported in 2006 as an alternative approach to PVB. RLB is performed with US imaging or the landmark technique. The efficacy of continuous RLB has been reported for breast cancer surgery .

However, the efficacy of ESPB has been described in a greater number of clinical reports than has RLB: a rib fracture, breast surgery, thoracoscopic surgery, lumbar spinal surgery, and laparoscopic abdominal surgery. In contrast to RLB, most of the literature on ESPB reported the use of the single-shot technique (80.2%). The local anesthetic was postulated to infiltrate the ventral and dorsal rami of the spinal nerve. However, Ueshima et al. reported that ESPB could not provide adequate analgesia of the anterior branch of the intercostal nerve.

The rationale of the study is that to the best of our knowledge each of ESPB and RLB has limitations regarding sensory block and distribution so our hypothesis is combining both will provide more solid block regarding sensory distribution, time interval of the block efficacy, and postoperative morphine consumption in patients undergoing thoracic surgeries.

Few studies evaluated the efficacy of ultrasound (US) guided erector spinae plane block on post-thoracotomy analgesia, however for the best of our knowledge no one compared the effect of ultrasound (US) guided retrolaminar block combined with erector spinae plane block and ultrasound (US) guided erector spinae plane block alone in patients undergoing thoracic surgeries.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post-thoracotomy Pain Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Randomization will be accomplished through the use of computer-generated random numbers and closed opaque envelopes. Another anesthesiologist who will not be involved in the other parts of the study will open the envelopes to enroll patients. and both patients and outcome assessors will be blinded to the assignment of groups.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1 Erector spinae plane block

Group 1 (ESPB (control group): (n = 15) patients will receive preoperative US-guided ESPB on the operated side by 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25%.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Erector spinae plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will be divided into 2 groups group 1 will receive US-guided ESPB and group 2 will receive US-guided ESPB + US-guided Retrolaminar plain block before induction of GA.

Group 2: Erector spinae plane block

US-guided ESPB with 10 ml bupivacaine 0.25% (n = 15) on the operated side.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Erector spinae plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will be divided into 2 groups group 1 will receive US-guided ESPB and group 2 will receive US-guided ESPB + US-guided Retrolaminar plain block before induction of GA.

Retro laminar block

the US-guided retrolaminar block 10 ml bupivacaine 0.25% group: (n = 15) on the operated side.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

erector spinae plane block + retrolaminar block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will be divided into 2 groups group 1 will receive US-guided ESPB and group 2 will receive US-guided ESPB + US-guided Retrolaminar plain block before induction of GA.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Erector spinae plane block

Patients will be divided into 2 groups group 1 will receive US-guided ESPB and group 2 will receive US-guided ESPB + US-guided Retrolaminar plain block before induction of GA.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

erector spinae plane block + retrolaminar block

Patients will be divided into 2 groups group 1 will receive US-guided ESPB and group 2 will receive US-guided ESPB + US-guided Retrolaminar plain block before induction of GA.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age from 18-65 years.
* body mass index (BMI) ranged between 20 and 40 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal.
* Sensitivity or contraindication to local anesthetic drugs.
* History of psychological disorders and/or chronic pain.
* Localized infection at the site of the block.
* Coagulopathies, patients on anticoagulants and antiplatelets, and significant liver or renal insufficiency
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

sherif Mamdouh Abbas

lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

sherif mamdouh, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cairo University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cairo Unviersity

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

sherif mamdouh, MD

Role: CONTACT

01141235049 ext. 002

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sherif M Abbas, MD

Role: primary

0201141235049 ext. 002

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MS-397-2022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.