Comparison of Analgesic Effect and Postoperative Recovery of SAPB Combined With ESPB and TPB After Thoracoscopic Surgery

NCT ID: NCT05538429

Last Updated: 2022-09-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

92 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-01

Study Completion Date

2022-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

After thoracoscopic surgery, patients still face moderate to severe pain. How to effectively control pain and promote postoperative recovery of patients is a challenging problem. Thoracic paraspinal block is effective in controlling pain after thoracoscopic surgery, but it also carries the risk of difficulty in operation and puncture of the pleura. In recent years, erector spinal plane block and serratus anterior plane block have been used for postoperative analgesia after thoracoscopic surgery. The purpose of this study was to explore whether erector spinal plane combined with serratus anterior plane block can replace thoracic paravertebral block and provide a more complete analgesia after thoracoscopic surgery. Therefore, this study is of great clinical significance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In a double-blind randomized controlled study, investigators allocated 92 patients undergoing VATS to either SAPB Combined With ESPB or TPB, with both groups receiving otherwise standardized treatment, including multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was 24-hr opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included the number of survival analgesia at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours postoperatively ,VAS scores was assessed during resting and coughing statuses at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours postoperatively, pulmonary function indexes before and 1, 4, 24 hours after surgery , QOR-15 scores before and 24 hours after surgery, postoperative complications and recovery time nodes drainage tube removal time, discharge time.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thoracoscopic Surgery Nerve Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ESPB&SAPB

erector spinal plane block combined with serratus anterior plane block

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

erector spinal plane combined with serratus anterior plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The experimental group received ultrasound-guided erector spinal block combined with serratus anterior plane block, and erector spinal block was performed at the T5 and T7 levels with 10ml 0.4% ropivacaine for each level, and 20ml 0.4% ropivacaine for serratus anterior plane block. The control group received ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block at T5 and T7 levels, respectively, with 20ml 0.4% ropivacaine at each level.

TPVB

thoracic paravertebral block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

erector spinal plane combined with serratus anterior plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The experimental group received ultrasound-guided erector spinal block combined with serratus anterior plane block, and erector spinal block was performed at the T5 and T7 levels with 10ml 0.4% ropivacaine for each level, and 20ml 0.4% ropivacaine for serratus anterior plane block. The control group received ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block at T5 and T7 levels, respectively, with 20ml 0.4% ropivacaine at each level.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

erector spinal plane combined with serratus anterior plane block

The experimental group received ultrasound-guided erector spinal block combined with serratus anterior plane block, and erector spinal block was performed at the T5 and T7 levels with 10ml 0.4% ropivacaine for each level, and 20ml 0.4% ropivacaine for serratus anterior plane block. The control group received ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block at T5 and T7 levels, respectively, with 20ml 0.4% ropivacaine at each level.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

thoracic paravertebral block

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. American ASA Grade I-III;
2. Age: 18 \~ 70 years old;

3 BMI 19 \~ 28kg/m2;

4\. Patients with elective thoracoscopic partial pneumonectomy under general anesthesia;

5 Informed Consent has been signed.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Use opioid analgesics on a daily basis or have a history of opioid abuse;
2. History of ipsilateral thoracotomy;
3. Allergic to any of the drugs used in the study, or have a history of drug allergy;
4. Mental or nervous system diseases, motor or sensory deficits;

5 there is coagulation dysfunction;

6\. Cognitive dysfunction, unable to cooperate with research;

7\. Severe renal, hepatic or cardiac dysfunction;

8\. Chest wall and spine trauma, infection, deformity and other cases where nerve block cannot be performed;

9\. Participated in other clinical trials within the 3 months prior to study inclusion;

10\. Investigators consider other reasons unsuitable for clinical trial participants;

11\. Patients refuse to participate.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zhangyi

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zhangyi

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology.

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yi Zhang, Dr.

Role: CONTACT

13986039131

Xuan Mo

Role: CONTACT

18776768640

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yi Zhang

Role: primary

13986039131

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1000012129

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.