The Efficacy of Serratus Anterior Plane Block (ESAPB) for Thoracotomy: a Prospective Study
NCT ID: NCT03839160
Last Updated: 2021-05-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-01
2021-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Two Different Plane Blocks on Post-thoracotomy Pain
NCT05083832
Continue ESPB & Continue ESPB Combined With SAPB for Thoracotomy
NCT06685445
Continuous Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Thoracic Paravertebral Block
NCT05898607
Comparison of Analgesic Effect and Postoperative Recovery of SAPB Combined With ESPB and TPB After Thoracoscopic Surgery
NCT05538429
Comparison of Erector Spinae Block and Combined Deep and Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block
NCT06073197
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is a prospective study carried out in a tertiary hospital. Patients scheduled for thoracotomy are randomized into two groups: Group M (intravenous patient-controlled-analgesia morphine) and Group S (intravenous patient-controlled analgesia morphine and SAPB). Morphine consumption, VAS pain score and Prince-Henry pain score are recorded for 72 hours respectively at PACU, 2hr, 6hr, 12hr, 24hr, 48hr and 72hr, with heart rate, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, mean arterial pressure and SpO2. Moreover, the profile of opioids-related side effects and length of hospital stay are documented. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of SAPB. The secondary objective is to compare the opioids-related side effects (including nausea, vomiting and pruritus), hemodynamic parameters and the length of hospital stay.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SAPB group. Group S
In this group, serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) was performed before extubation with injection of 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride followed by 0.1ml/kg/hr of 0.12% bupivacaine hydrochloride. In addition to SAPB, intravenous patient-controlled-analgesia morphine was used. Morphine solution was prepared at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL with the device programmed to 2 mg of bolus dose and 10 min of locking time.
Serratus anterior plane block
Serratus anterior plane block was applied in Group S. It was performed at the end of the operation following the skin closure, while the patient lay on his side with his arm above the head. After proper site cleaning, the first and second ribs were identified with a linear probe in the midclavicular line. The USG probe was advanced caudally in the sagittal plane, and the fourth and fifth ribs were visualized. The USG probe was then directed posteriorly and the serratus, latissimus dorsi and intercostal muscles were visualized. Bupivacaine 0.25% 30 mL was administered to the lower plane of the serratus muscle through an inserted catheter under the guidance of USG through the in-line technique. Afterwards, 0.12% bupivacaine hydrochloride was maintained at the rate of 0.1ml/kg/hr.
Intravenous patient-controlled-analgesia morphine
Morphine solution was prepared at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL with the device programmed to 2 mg of bolus dose and 10 min of locking time.
Control group. Group C
In this group, intravenous patient-controlled-analgesia morphine was used. Morphine solution was prepared at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL with the device programmed to 2 mg of bolus dose and 10 min of locking time.
Intravenous patient-controlled-analgesia morphine
Morphine solution was prepared at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL with the device programmed to 2 mg of bolus dose and 10 min of locking time.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Serratus anterior plane block
Serratus anterior plane block was applied in Group S. It was performed at the end of the operation following the skin closure, while the patient lay on his side with his arm above the head. After proper site cleaning, the first and second ribs were identified with a linear probe in the midclavicular line. The USG probe was advanced caudally in the sagittal plane, and the fourth and fifth ribs were visualized. The USG probe was then directed posteriorly and the serratus, latissimus dorsi and intercostal muscles were visualized. Bupivacaine 0.25% 30 mL was administered to the lower plane of the serratus muscle through an inserted catheter under the guidance of USG through the in-line technique. Afterwards, 0.12% bupivacaine hydrochloride was maintained at the rate of 0.1ml/kg/hr.
Intravenous patient-controlled-analgesia morphine
Morphine solution was prepared at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL with the device programmed to 2 mg of bolus dose and 10 min of locking time.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* BMI 18-28kg/m2
* Wedge incision and lobectomy
Exclusion Criteria
* History of opioid dependence
* Allergy to bupivacaine hydrochloride
* Severe bleeding during operation or post operation
* Inability to communicate with investigators.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jing Cang, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Zhongshan Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
truncal block SAPB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.