Combine Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Coronary Bypass Surgery

NCT ID: NCT05308797

Last Updated: 2023-01-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Even though Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block is shown to be efficient in cardiac surgery, the Combine Serratus Anterior Plane (CSAP) Block is still controversial if it has an efficient analgesic effect for sternotomy and drain tube pain relief. This study aims to compare ESP block and CSAP block for postoperative analgesia in coronary bypass surgery patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Acute postoperative pain after cardiac surgery originates various surgical procedures that may cause pain including the incision of tissues, sternotomy, the separation of bone-joint structures, the severity and duration of these applications, the use of chest tubes, and the patient's personal inflammatory may affect the response to these stimuli. Postoperative pain is a critical risk factor for the development of pulmonary and cardiovascular complications such as atelectasis, cardiac ischemia, and arrhythmias. Researchers claim that adding techniques to iv drugs, such as thoracic epidural anesthesia, paravertebral block, or erector spinae plane block (ESP) to multimodal analgesia regimens positively affect recovery. Although the efficacy of ESP block in providing postoperative analgesia has been demonstrated in many studies, there is no study comparing CSAP and ESP block in cardiac surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Surgery Postoperative Pain Regional Anesthesia Morbidity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Erector Spinae Plane Block

An erector spinae plane block will be performed at the level of the 5th thoracic vertebrae with 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine solution under ultrasound guidance before the operation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ESP block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Preoperative, awake, bilateral, ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block with 30 mL 0.25 % bupivacaine

Combine Serratus Anterior Plane Block

Combine Serratus Anterior Plane block will be performed at the level of 5th costa with 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (15 mL superficial serratus plane block and 15 mL deep serratus plane block) solution under ultrasound guidance before the operation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CASP block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Preoperative, awake, bilateral, ultrasound-guided combine serratus anterior plane block with 30 mL 0.25 % bupivacaine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ESP block

Preoperative, awake, bilateral, ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block with 30 mL 0.25 % bupivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

CASP block

Preoperative, awake, bilateral, ultrasound-guided combine serratus anterior plane block with 30 mL 0.25 % bupivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients who will undergo coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with median sternotomy

Exclusion Criteria

* Emergency surgeries
* Patients with allergic reactions to anesthesia and analgesia drugs to be used
* Patients who do not want to participate in the study voluntarily
* Severe systemic disease (kidney, liver, pulmonary, endocrine)
* Substance abuse history
* History of chronic pain
* Psychiatric problems and communication difficulties
* Patients who need revision due to hemostasis in the postoperative period
* Patients with severe hemodynamic instability due to infection, heavy bleeding, etc.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Eda Balcı

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

ZELİHA A DEMİR, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ankara City Hospital

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jannati M, Attar A. Analgesia and sedation post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a review of the literature. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019 Jun 20;15:773-781. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S195267. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31417264 (View on PubMed)

Caruso TJ, Lawrence K, Tsui BCH. Regional anesthesia for cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Oct;32(5):674-682. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000769.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31356362 (View on PubMed)

Jack JM, McLellan E, Versyck B, Englesakis MF, Chin KJ. The role of serratus anterior plane and pectoral nerves blocks in cardiac surgery, thoracic surgery and trauma: a qualitative systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2020 Oct;75(10):1372-1385. doi: 10.1111/anae.15000. Epub 2020 Feb 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32062870 (View on PubMed)

Abdallah NM, Bakeer AH, Youssef RB, Zaki HV, Abbas DN. Ultrasound-guided continuous serratus anterior plane block: dexmedetomidine as an adjunctive analgesic with levobupivacaine for post-thoracotomy pain. A prospective randomized controlled study. J Pain Res. 2019 Apr 30;12:1425-1431. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S195431. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31118760 (View on PubMed)

Forero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, Chin KJ. Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block for Rescue Analgesia in Thoracotomy After Epidural Failure: A Case Report. A A Case Rep. 2017 May 15;8(10):254-256. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000478.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28252539 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MH2.4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

SPSIP Block and Opioid Use After MICS
NCT07259824 RECRUITING NA
ESPB vs TPVB for Cardiac Surgery
NCT05476393 WITHDRAWN NA