US-Guided ESPB Versus TPVB on Acute and Chronic Pain After VATS

NCT ID: NCT04964401

Last Updated: 2021-09-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-13

Study Completion Date

2021-09-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Postoperative acute and chronic pain is frequently observed in patients undergoing video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This prolongs the discharge time of patients and increases the frequency of postoperative pulmonary complications. Recently, alternative analgesic methods such as thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB), which are thought to have less side effects than thoracic epidural analgesia, have been used. Among these methods, ultrasound (US) guided TPVB is the most preferred method. In addition, ESPB application is increasing in patients undergoing VATS. In the literature, the number of cases performed with ESPB and randomized controlled prospective studies with ESPB are increasing. In this study, it is planned to compare the effects of US-guided TPVB and ESPB on postoperative acute and chronic pain in patients undergoing VATS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Thoracic Paravertebral Block Erector Spinae Plane Block Acute Pain Chronic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Thoracic Paravertebral Block

After the linear ultrasound (US) probe will be placed 2-3 cm lateral to the thoracic 5 spinous process, the US-compatible needle will be advanced to the paravertebral area with in-plane technique, and 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride will be injected into this area.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Thoracic paravertebral block vs Erector spinae plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thoracic paravertebral block and erector spinae plane block will be performed unilaterally, under US guidance, before the surgical operation, after the induction of anesthesia, when the patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position.

Erector spinae plane block

After the linear ultrasound (US) probe will be placed 2-3 cm lateral to the T5 spinous process, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride will be injected into the interfacial space below the erector spinae muscle, above the transverse process.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Thoracic paravertebral block vs Erector spinae plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thoracic paravertebral block and erector spinae plane block will be performed unilaterally, under US guidance, before the surgical operation, after the induction of anesthesia, when the patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Thoracic paravertebral block vs Erector spinae plane block

Thoracic paravertebral block and erector spinae plane block will be performed unilaterally, under US guidance, before the surgical operation, after the induction of anesthesia, when the patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 18 and 80 years
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II-III
* Body mass index between 18-30 kg/m2
* Patients undergoing elective video assiste thoracoscopic surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Advanced cancer
* History of chronic analgesic therapy
* History of local anesthetic allergy
* Infection in the intervention area
* Patients with bleeding disorders
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Musa Zengin

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Musa Zengin, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ankara Atatürk Chest Disease and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital

Keçiören, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-KAEK-15:2232

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ESP vs SPSIP Block in VATS Analgesia
NCT07232940 RECRUITING NA