Ultrasound Guided Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block in Pediatric Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery

NCT ID: NCT07099560

Last Updated: 2025-09-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-01

Study Completion Date

2026-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Randomized, parallel-group, assessor-blinded clinical trial at Tanta University Hospitals comparing ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (sESPB) versus ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block for postoperative analgesia in male children (1-5 years) undergoing hypospadias repair. Seventy participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive sESPB or caudal block with 0.25% bupivacaine (0.5-1 mL/kg; maximum 20 mL) after induction of general anesthesia. The primary outcome is pain over the first 24 hours, assessed using the FLACC scale at prespecified time points. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting, parent/guardian satisfaction, hemodynamic trends, and predefined adverse effects (e.g., motor weakness, urinary retention, respiratory depression, hematoma, infection at injection site). Perioperative care is standardized; rescue pethidine is administered when FLACC ≥4. The trial evaluates whether sESPB provides superior or comparable analgesia with fewer adverse effects than caudal block.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Randomized, parallel-group, assessor-blinded clinical trial at Tanta University Hospitals comparing ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (sESPB) versus ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block for postoperative analgesia in male children (1-5 years) undergoing hypospadias repair. Seventy participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive sESPB or caudal block with 0.25% bupivacaine (0.5-1 mL/kg; maximum 20 mL) after induction of general anesthesia. The primary outcome is pain over the first 24 hours, assessed using the FLACC scale at prespecified time points. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting, parent/guardian satisfaction, hemodynamic trends, and predefined adverse effects (e.g., motor weakness, urinary retention, respiratory depression, hematoma, infection at injection site). Perioperative care is standardized; rescue pethidine is administered when FLACC ≥4. The trial evaluates whether sESPB provides superior or comparable analgesia with fewer adverse effects than caudal block.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypospadias Caudal Block Erector Spinae Plane Block Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two-arm, parallel assignment. Participants are randomized 1:1 after induction of anesthesia to receive either ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block or ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block. Each participant receives one procedure only (no crossover), and both groups are followed concurrently for 24 hours with standardized perioperative care. Randomization uses a computer-generated sequence with allocation concealment via sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Blocks are performed by an anesthesiologist not involved in postoperative assessments; outcome assessors are blinded to group assignment. Single-center study at Tanta University Hospitals.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A: Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block (sESPB)

Participants receive bilateral ultrasound-guided sacral ESPB after induction of general anesthesia. Using a high-frequency linear probe, the needle is advanced to the sacral fascial plane near the median sacral crest; after negative aspiration, bupivacaine 0.25% at 0.5-1 mL/kg (maximum total volume 20 mL) is injected. Standardized perioperative care; rescue analgesia (pethidine 0.5 mg/kg) if FLACC ≥4.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (sESPB)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After induction of general anesthesia, bilateral sESPB is performed under ultrasound guidance. Needle advanced to the sacral interfascial plane near the median sacral crest; after negative aspiration, bupivacaine 0.25% at 0.5-1 mL/kg (max total 20 mL) is injected. Standardized perioperative care; rescue pethidine 0.5 mg/kg if FLACC ≥4.

Arm B - Active Comparator: Caudal Epidural Block

Participants receive ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block after induction of general anesthesia. Needle introduced via the sacral hiatus under ultrasound; after negative aspiration, bupivacaine 0.25% at 0.5-1 mL/kg (maximum total volume 20 mL) is injected. Standardized perioperative care; rescue pethidine if FLACC ≥4.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After induction of general anesthesia, caudal epidural injection via sacral hiatus under ultrasound guidance; after negative aspiration, bupivacaine 0.25% at 0.5-1 mL/kg (max total 20 mL) is injected. Standardized perioperative care; rescue pethidine if FLACC ≥4.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (sESPB)

After induction of general anesthesia, bilateral sESPB is performed under ultrasound guidance. Needle advanced to the sacral interfascial plane near the median sacral crest; after negative aspiration, bupivacaine 0.25% at 0.5-1 mL/kg (max total 20 mL) is injected. Standardized perioperative care; rescue pethidine 0.5 mg/kg if FLACC ≥4.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block

After induction of general anesthesia, caudal epidural injection via sacral hiatus under ultrasound guidance; after negative aspiration, bupivacaine 0.25% at 0.5-1 mL/kg (max total 20 mL) is injected. Standardized perioperative care; rescue pethidine if FLACC ≥4.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

sESPB sacral ESP block Caudal epidural block (CEB) Caudal epidural anesthesia Caudal block

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male children aged 1-5 years
* ASA physical status I-II
* Scheduled for elective hypospadias repair under general anesthesia
* Parent or legal guardian provides written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Parent/guardian refusal of participation
* Coagulopathy or current anticoagulant therapy
* Infection at the intended injection site (sacral/caudal region) or systemic infection
* Allergy/hypersensitivity to amide local anesthetics (e.g., bupivacaine) or study medications
* Neurologic or spinal disorders or congenital sacral anomalies affecting block safety
* Significant hepatic, renal, or cardiac disease
* Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, contraindicates caudal block or sacral ESPB or could interfere with safe participation
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

5 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tanta University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ghada Magdy Ahmed Elfekey

Resident of Anesthesia, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Management

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ghada MA Elfekey, MBBCH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tanta University Hospital

Tanta, El-Gharbia Govenorate, Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ghada MA Elfekey, MBBCH

Role: CONTACT

+201271600557

Marwa A Eloraby, MD

Role: CONTACT

+201008618309

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

36264MS869/3/25

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Analgesia in Pediatric Hypospadias Surgeries
NCT06410482 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA