Posterior Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block as a Part of Multimodal Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT ID: NCT05448495
Last Updated: 2022-07-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-07-13
2023-09-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Erector Spinae vs TAP in Lower Abdominal Surgery
NCT04555993
Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block After Elective Cesarean Section
NCT04016688
Lower Thoracic Epidural vs Erector Spinae Block for PNL
NCT05725083
Comparison of Erector Spina Plan Block and Trnsversus Abdominis Plan Block in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05913167
Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Open Splenectomy
NCT05448469
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
ESPB is an interfascial block which can provide wide sensory blockade from T2-4 to L1-2 that was first described in 2016. ESPB can be performed by injecting the local anesthetic in the deep interfascial plane of the erector spinae muscle with nearly one dermatome for each 3.4 ml of the injected volume. This allows ESPB to provide both visceral and somatic analgesia. TAP block is a regional injection of a local anesthetic agent between the transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscle planes. TAP block affects the sensory nerves of the anterolateral abdominal wall (T6-L1). Various technical modifications in TAP block have been described including lateral, posterior, subcostal, and continuous catheter techniques. The posterior approach should be the preferred technique in clinical practice as it provides longer somatic and visceral analgesia that are not offered with the lateral approach.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Posterior TAP block
Posterior TAP block
Using high-frequency linear ultrasound probe, a total volume of 24 ml (20 ml isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% + 2 ml dexmedetomidine \[0.5 mcg\\kg\] + 2ml dexamethasone \[0.1mg\\kg)\] will be injected at the plane between internal oblique and transversus abdominis near the aponeurosis at the posterior axillary line.
ESPB
ESPB
Using high-frequency linear ultrasound probe, a total volume of 24 ml (20 ml isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% + 2 ml dexmedetomidine \[0.5 mcg\\kg\] + 2ml dexamethasone \[0.1mg\\kg)\] will be injected at T9 erector spinae plane
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Posterior TAP block
Using high-frequency linear ultrasound probe, a total volume of 24 ml (20 ml isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% + 2 ml dexmedetomidine \[0.5 mcg\\kg\] + 2ml dexamethasone \[0.1mg\\kg)\] will be injected at the plane between internal oblique and transversus abdominis near the aponeurosis at the posterior axillary line.
ESPB
Using high-frequency linear ultrasound probe, a total volume of 24 ml (20 ml isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% + 2 ml dexmedetomidine \[0.5 mcg\\kg\] + 2ml dexamethasone \[0.1mg\\kg)\] will be injected at T9 erector spinae plane
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA status I-II
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient who has difficulty understanding the study protocol or patient refusal.
3. Chronic respiratory disease patients.
4. Diabetic patients.
5. Body mass index (BMI) \> 30 Kg/m2
6. Routine corticosteroids, pain medication, or anticonvulsant.
7. Psychiatric diseases.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
FATMA NABIL AHMED MOHAMED
Clinical Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assiut University
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Posterior TAPB versus ERSPB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.