Effect of Regional Anesthesia on Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgeries
NCT ID: NCT04586257
Last Updated: 2024-04-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
93 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-10-15
2024-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients will be admitted to the OR where induction of general anesthesia was started and then, the patients will be randomly distributed into two equal groups; -
* Group I (40 patients) (ESP block): patients in this group will receive ESP block after induction of general anesthesia.
* Group II (40 patients) (TLIP block): patients in this group will receive TLIP block after induction of general anesthesia
Measurements; - The length of hospital stay as the primary outcome Postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption as the Secondary outcome
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Retrolaminar Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block as Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Enhanced Recovery After Posterior Lumbar Discectomy
NCT06725680
Effectiveness of Combining Erector Spinea Block With Non Opioid Infusions as Opioid Free Anesthesia in Spine Surgeries.
NCT05850468
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block vs Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block
NCT05596227
Evaluation of Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Herniated Lumbar Disc Surgery
NCT03285282
Erectae Spinae Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesis in Lumbar Surgeries
NCT05123092
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will be randomly classified using a computer-generated software of randomization into 2 groups:
* Group I (40 patients) (ESP block): patients in this group will receive ESP block after induction of general anesthesia.
* Group II (40 patients) (TLIP block): patients in this group will receive TLIP block after induction of general anesthesia
Anesthetic technique
* The patients will be assessed preoperatively in the anesthesia clinic. On arrival of patients to the preparation room, an intravenous line will be established and the patient will be connected to a monitor. All the patients will receive pheniramine hydrogen maleate 45.5 mg intravenous as an antihistamine, Cefazolin30 mg/kg, and 40 mg pantoprazole.
* Induction of anesthesia will be carried out by fentanyl 1 ug/kg, propofol 1.5 mg/kg, and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg to facilitate tracheal intubation. After securing the airway through a suitable sized endotracheal tube, the patient was connected to a mechanical ventilator with its parameters adjusted to maintain the end-tidal carbon dioxide 34-38 mmHg.
* Maintenance of the anesthesia was performed by isoflurane 1.MAC and incremental doses of atracurium 0.1 mg/kg. A temperature probe was inserted in the nasopharynx for core temperature monitoring. The depth of anesthesia was monitored by the bispectral index (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA). The BIS values were kept 40-60. An additional bolus dose of fentanyl 0.5 ug/kg was used in case of increase BIS more than 60 or increase in the heart rate or mean arterial pressure by more than 15 % of the baseline values.
* All patients received tranexamic acid 30 mg/kg through intravenous infusion. Before skin incision, patients of group I will receive ultrasound-guided ESP block, while patients in group II will receive ultrasound guided TLIP block.
* At the end of the surgery, the isoflurane was switched off with reversal of muscle relaxation and awake tracheal extubation and transfer of the patient to the recovery room for postoperative monitoring and supplementation of oxygen through a nasal cannula (2-3 L/min). All the patients will receive 4 mg dexamethasone I .v after induction of anesthesia and 4 mg of ondansetron i.v at the end of the surgery to guard against postoperative nausea and vomiting. All the patients received routine postoperative analgesia in the form of paracetamol 1 gm i.v infusion every 6 hours and ketorolac 30 mg i.v every 12 hours. Rescue analgesia in the form of morphine 3 mg i.v was administrated when the pain score was more than 3.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
TRIPLE
* An anesthesia resident who will not participate in the study and have no subsequent rule in it will help in the preparation of local anesthetic mixtures under strict aseptic precautions.
* An assistant nurse who will be blinded to the study groups and will have no subsequent rule in it will help in the collection of the data of measurements.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group I
patients in this group will receive Erector spinae plane block after induction of general anesthesia.
Erector spinae plane block
While patients in the prone position, 1.4-5.1 MHz low-frequency probe (C5-1s convex transducer) will be first placed in a longitudinal orientation in the midline to identify the spinous process of at the appropriate lumbar level, then it will be scanned laterally about 2-3 cm until visualization of the paraspinal muscles and the transverse process at the same time. After standard sterilization, a 21-G short bevel nerve block needle will be advanced in a cephalad-to-caudal direction, in-plane under real- time ultrasound guidance, through skin, subcutaneous tissue, and erector spinae muscles until reaching the transverse process. After negative aspiration of blood or cerebral spinal fluid, a small volume of local anesthetic was injected to confirm the position of the needle tip between the erector spinae muscles and the transverse process. A total of 20 ml of 0.0.25% plain bupivacaine will be incrementally injected with intermittent negative aspiration on each side.
Group II
patients in this group will receive thoracolumbar interfascial plane block after induction of general anesthesia
Throacolumbar interfacial plane block
USG-guided TLIP block will be performed using a high-frequency linear probe while the patient in prone position. The probe will be covered with sterile sheath positioned transversally in a midline position at approximately the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra (L3). The corresponding spinous process and interspinal muscles will be identified, and the probe will be slid laterally to identify the multifidus (MF) muscle and longissimus (LG) muscle. Sliding the probe from midline to laterally helps in the correct identification of various muscles. After identifying the muscles, TLIP block will be performed aseptically on both sides of L3 vertebra. Under ultrasound guidance, an insulated echogenic needle will be inserted in-plane in a lateral to medial orientation in-plane USG guided through the belly of LG toward the MF. When needle reach deep to middle of MF/LG interface, 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected after negative aspiration. The block will be administered bilaterally.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Erector spinae plane block
While patients in the prone position, 1.4-5.1 MHz low-frequency probe (C5-1s convex transducer) will be first placed in a longitudinal orientation in the midline to identify the spinous process of at the appropriate lumbar level, then it will be scanned laterally about 2-3 cm until visualization of the paraspinal muscles and the transverse process at the same time. After standard sterilization, a 21-G short bevel nerve block needle will be advanced in a cephalad-to-caudal direction, in-plane under real- time ultrasound guidance, through skin, subcutaneous tissue, and erector spinae muscles until reaching the transverse process. After negative aspiration of blood or cerebral spinal fluid, a small volume of local anesthetic was injected to confirm the position of the needle tip between the erector spinae muscles and the transverse process. A total of 20 ml of 0.0.25% plain bupivacaine will be incrementally injected with intermittent negative aspiration on each side.
Throacolumbar interfacial plane block
USG-guided TLIP block will be performed using a high-frequency linear probe while the patient in prone position. The probe will be covered with sterile sheath positioned transversally in a midline position at approximately the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra (L3). The corresponding spinous process and interspinal muscles will be identified, and the probe will be slid laterally to identify the multifidus (MF) muscle and longissimus (LG) muscle. Sliding the probe from midline to laterally helps in the correct identification of various muscles. After identifying the muscles, TLIP block will be performed aseptically on both sides of L3 vertebra. Under ultrasound guidance, an insulated echogenic needle will be inserted in-plane in a lateral to medial orientation in-plane USG guided through the belly of LG toward the MF. When needle reach deep to middle of MF/LG interface, 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected after negative aspiration. The block will be administered bilaterally.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Body mass index (BMI) less than 18 or higher than35 kg/m2
* Pregnant
* History of relevant allergy to related perioperative medications
* Previous lumbar spine surgery
* Existing contraindications to nerve block such as coagulopathy, local and systemic infection
* Hepatic or renal insufficiency
* Chronic opioid use
21 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tanta University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sameh Abdelkhalik Ahmed Ismaiel
Dr
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sameh Abdelkhalik
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tanta University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Medicine
Tanta, Algharbia, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
34142/9/20
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.