Effect of ChatGPT-Supported Education on Nursing Students' Aspiration Practice Knowledge and Motivation
NCT ID: NCT07096518
Last Updated: 2025-08-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-04
2025-07-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education
NCT07090408
CHATBOT USE ON NURSING STUDENTS
NCT07310940
Impact of AI-Supported Teaching on Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Students
NCT06999447
The Effect of Artificial Intelligence-Supported Intramuscular and Subcutaneous Injection Training on Nursing Students
NCT07253571
Impact of ChatGPT-based Nursing Process Training
NCT06297382
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Endotracheal suctioning is a critical nursing procedure, especially in intensive care settings, to maintain airway patency and ensure adequate oxygenation. However, existing literature indicates that nursing students often find this procedure challenging and anxiety-inducing, with generally low levels of knowledge.
AI tools like ChatGPT have been reported to enhance individualized learning, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Therefore, integrating ChatGPT into nursing education was considered to have the potential to improve theoretical knowledge acquisition and increase students' motivation toward the lecture.
The study was conducted with third- and fourth-year nursing students enrolled in the undergraduate program at Izmir University of Economics, using a randomized controlled, quasi-experimental design. Knowledge, motivation levels, and knowledge retention were compared between control and intervention groups to evaluate the effect of ChatGPT-integrated education. Additionally, students' feedback regarding the educational experience was collected and analyzed.
Data collection instruments included the Student Information Form, the Suctioning Knowledge Questionnaire, the ARCS (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction) Motivation Learning Scale, and the Student Feedback Form.
Lectures were planned separately for the control and intervention groups. The control group received traditional instruction methods such as presentations, video demonstrations, and discussions. In contrast, the intervention group accessed information and performed critical evaluations using ChatGPT. In a classroom setting, students discussed the information obtained via ChatGPT by comparing it with the latest published clinical guidelines on suctioning practice. Knowledge tests were administered before and after the lectures in both groups, and a follow-up knowledge test was conducted six weeks later to assess knowledge retention.
Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 21. Frequency analysis was conducted for categorical data, descriptive statistics for numerical data, and parametric or non-parametric tests were applied for group comparisons. The level of significance was set at 0.05. The findings aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the educational programs and demonstrate the impact of innovative teaching approaches.
Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee for Health Sciences Research at Izmir University of Economics and the Dean's Office of the Faculty of Health Sciences. Participants were informed about the study, data confidentiality, and their right to withdraw at any time. All participants provided written informed consent. Necessary permissions were obtained for the use of validated measurement tools, and all course materials were shared with participants via the Blackboard platform.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Traditional Lecture Group
This group received a traditional lecture based on a passive learning model, where the student is a passive recipient and the instructor is the information provider. The lecture included PowerPoint presentations, question-and-answer sessions, and video demonstrations.
No interventions assigned to this group
ChatGPT-Integrated Lecture Group
This group received a structured and interactive educational lecture integrated with ChatGPT, an AI language model, enabling students to learn collaboratively through guided activities related to endotracheal suctioning. Students compared the information obtained from ChatGPT with evidence-based, up-to-date clinical guidelines and discussed the comparison results together in the classroom. The instructor provided guidance throughout the process.
ChatGPT-Integrated Lecture
This group received a structured and interactive educational lecture integrated with ChatGPT, an AI language model, enabling students to learn collaboratively through guided activities related to endotracheal suctioning. Students compared the information obtained from ChatGPT with evidence-based, up-to-date clinical guidelines and discussed the comparison results together in the classroom. The instructor provided guidance throughout the process.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ChatGPT-Integrated Lecture
This group received a structured and interactive educational lecture integrated with ChatGPT, an AI language model, enabling students to learn collaboratively through guided activities related to endotracheal suctioning. Students compared the information obtained from ChatGPT with evidence-based, up-to-date clinical guidelines and discussed the comparison results together in the classroom. The instructor provided guidance throughout the process.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Students who voluntarily agree to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Students who do not respond to the pre- or post-intervention surveys
20 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
OTHER
Izmir University of Economics
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Emine SEZGÜNSAY
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emine Sezgünsay, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
İzmir University of Economics, Department of Nursing
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
İzmir University of ;Economics
Izmir, Balçova, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Shorey S, Mattar C, Pereira TL, Choolani M. A scoping review of ChatGPT's role in healthcare education and research. Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Apr;135:106121. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106121. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
Gunawan J, Aungsuroch Y, Montayre J. ChatGPT integration within nursing education and its implications for nursing students: A systematic review and text network analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Oct;141:106323. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106323. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IEU-SBF-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.