Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-11-04
2023-01-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Simulation Practices on Breastfeeding Knowledge and Skills of Nursing Students
NCT06643546
Effıcıency Of Hybrıd Based Sımulatıon Method In Breastfeedıng Educatıon
NCT06458283
The Effect of Hybrid Simulation-Based Lactation Consultancy Training on the Skills of Midwifery Students
NCT06528795
Effect of a Nurse Navigation Program on Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy and Motivation in Primiparous Women
NCT07177664
The Effect of Simulation-based Training on Nursing Students
NCT05302635
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
high-fidelity simulation
These students participated in a breastfeeding management scenario with a high-fidelity simulation mannikin named Noella S554.100 (n=11).
high-fidelity simulation
The high-fidelity simulation involved a student and a computer-based mannikin. Prior to the start of the scenario, a pre-briefing session was provided. The scenario was executed with the help of the researcher from the control room. The student's performance during the simulation was recorded with video. Each simulation lasted around 30 minutes. Following the simulation, a debriefing session was held with the student, and feedback was provided. Scales were used to assess the implementation of the practices.
hybrid simulation
These students participated in the same breastfeeding management scenario with a standardized patient (n=11).
hybrid simulation
The hybrid simulation involved a student and a standardized patient. The patient wore a wearable breast model and held a model baby. Prior to the start of the scenario, a pre-briefing session was provided. The student's performance during the simulation was recorded with video. Each simulation lasted around 30 minutes. Following the simulation, a debriefing session was held with the student, and feedback was provided. Scales were used to assess the implementation of the practices.
telesimulation
These students participated in the same breastfeeding management scenario with a standardized patient via Microsoft Teams video conferencing. (n=11)
telesimulation
The telesimulation involved a student and a standardized patient. The patient wore a wearable breast model and held a model baby. Students and patients communicated via video conferencing. Prior to the start of the scenario, a pre-briefing session was provided. The student's performance during the simulation was recorded with video. Each simulation lasted around 30 minutes. Following the simulation, a debriefing session was held with the student, and feedback was provided. Scales were used to assess the implementation of the practices.
control
The students in this group were the control group, and no intervention was made.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
high-fidelity simulation
The high-fidelity simulation involved a student and a computer-based mannikin. Prior to the start of the scenario, a pre-briefing session was provided. The scenario was executed with the help of the researcher from the control room. The student's performance during the simulation was recorded with video. Each simulation lasted around 30 minutes. Following the simulation, a debriefing session was held with the student, and feedback was provided. Scales were used to assess the implementation of the practices.
hybrid simulation
The hybrid simulation involved a student and a standardized patient. The patient wore a wearable breast model and held a model baby. Prior to the start of the scenario, a pre-briefing session was provided. The student's performance during the simulation was recorded with video. Each simulation lasted around 30 minutes. Following the simulation, a debriefing session was held with the student, and feedback was provided. Scales were used to assess the implementation of the practices.
telesimulation
The telesimulation involved a student and a standardized patient. The patient wore a wearable breast model and held a model baby. Students and patients communicated via video conferencing. Prior to the start of the scenario, a pre-briefing session was provided. The student's performance during the simulation was recorded with video. Each simulation lasted around 30 minutes. Following the simulation, a debriefing session was held with the student, and feedback was provided. Scales were used to assess the implementation of the practices.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ege University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
sümeyye bakır
doctoral student/research assistant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
sümeyye bakır, master
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ege University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sümeyye Bakır
Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sittner BJ, Aebersold ML, Paige JB, Graham LL, Schram AP, Decker SI, Lioce L. INACSL Standards of Best Practice for Simulation: Past, Present, and Future. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):294-8. doi: 10.5480/15-1670.
Toruner EK, Altay N, Arpaci T, Sari Ozturk C, Ceylan C, Yildiz S, Cakir G. The development of a self-evaluation scale for simulation laboratory practices. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Sep;104:104990. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104990. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
Moloney M, Murphy L, Kingston L, Markey K, Hennessy T, Meskell P, Atkinson S, Doody O. Final year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students' perspectives on simulation-based education: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2022 Nov 6;21(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01084-w.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
E.496527
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.