Unsweetened Sparkling Water and Changes in Sweetness Perception in Adolescents

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-09

Study Completion Date

2021-06-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study design is a prospective observational study in adolescents who are at risk for developing Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), to evaluate the effectiveness of sparkling water to reduce dietary intake of added sugars and thereby improve glycemia. Study data on consumption and the flavor profile of sparkling water will serve as a measure of acceptability. The study intervention will be to provide carbonated flavored sparkling water for 12 weeks to adolescents (and their families) who have a usual intake of 2 or more servings of sugar sweetened beverages (SSB) per day and are at a high risk for developing type 2 diabetes. Study measures will be obtained before and after the exposure to carbonated flavored sparkling water and each participant will serve as his/her own control. To encourage the participants to substitute the carbonated flavored sparkling water, study personnel will send them weekly iMessages through the Technology Assisted Dietary Assessment (TADA) app. In addition, investigators will monitor the participants' diet, using the TADA app, every two weeks, for 4 days. Study measurements will be obtained at baseline, before the intervention, during and at the end of the 12 week intervention.

Objective: Determine the effect of reducing added sugars intake by substituting carbonated sparkling water on T2D risk in adolescents.

Hypothesis: Adolescents who decrease consumption of SSB by substituting sparkling water will experience decreased blood glucose concentrations and increased insulin sensitivity during an oral glucose tolerance test and decreased glucose excursions during continued glucose monitoring, compared to those who do not decrease consumption of SSB.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Study Of Drinks With Artificial Sweeteners in People With Type 2 Diabetes

NCT03944616

Type 2 Diabetes

COMPLETED NA

Strategies To OPpose Sugars With Non-nutritive Sweeteners Or Water (STOP Sugars NOW) Trial

NCT03543644

Healthy Overweight and Obesity Metabolic Syndrome +8 more

COMPLETED NA

Comparison of the Effects of a 12-Week Consumption of Two Carbonated Beverages on Insulin Sensitivity

NCT02031497

Glucose Homeostasis

COMPLETED NA

A Sensory Strategy to Cut Sugary Beverages in African/American and Latine Adolescents

NCT07223151

Obesity, Adolescent Dietary Sugars Taste Perception +2 more

RECRUITING NA

Kids Rehydration During Exercise

NCT05989607

Dehydration in Children Dehydration Following Exertion (Disorder)

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Importance of studying added sugars in adolescents. Research that leads to nutritional strategies to prevent T2D in adolescents is an urgent pursuit. One particular contributing factor to the growth of T2D and prediabetes in adolescents is the increased consumption of added sugars. Adolescents in the U.S. have high intakes of added sugars which could have poor health implications. Added sugars are found in sugar sweetened beverages and desserts and snacks, top sources of energy for adolescents, and calories from added sugars contribute to 16% of the total energy intake. Levels are well above recommendations from leading scientific organizations, which suggest limiting added sugars to less than 10% of energy. However, it is not clear whether sugar reduction to less than 10% of energy is palatable for an adolescent population that prefers sweetened foods and beverages. Moreover, uncertainty about the evidence linking added sugar consumption to risk of disease has made policies that seek to reduce dietary intake of added sugar controversial. The controversy impairs large-scale implementation of recommendations to reduce intake of added sugars by individuals, clinicians, policy makers and industry stakeholders.

Evidence linking added sugars and risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease lacks information on adolescents. Many epidemiological studies in adults, but not all show the concept that after controlling for energy intake, high consumption of sugar-sweetened foods is a risk factor for T2D. Epidemiological studies also associate high consumption of added sugars, particularly from sugar sweetened beverages (SSB), with increased adiposity (including central adiposity) and dyslipidemia. These studies formed the basis of recommendations to limit added sugar consumption from the American Heart Organization. The data in youth is limited. Two small randomized studies compared the effects of glucose versus fructose beverages on insulin sensitivity in adolescents and findings were mixed. One longitudinal cohort study showed that higher consumption of added sugars, from SSB, was associated with hyperglycemia and impaired insulin sensitivity in youth aged 8 - 12 years. One study showed that high amounts of added sugars may induce insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction and such effects can occur independent of adiposity. The literature lacks evidence linking high consumption of added sugars to risk of developing youth-onset T2D.

Substituting Flavored Sparkling Water for Sugar Sweetened Beverages. Instead of sugar, food manufacturers typically sweeten foods beverages using low-calorie or artificial sweeteners. "Diet" versions of SSB have been available for several decades and are widely used by adults and children. However the safety of low calorie sweeteners is controversial and many in the scientific and lay communities do not promote their use as a substitute for SSB. We propose that an alternative to SSB may be found in sparkling waters (carbonated water with flavoring, completely unsweetened), which are commercially available in soda-like flavors like cola or Dr. Pepper™. The rationale for the current project is the urgent need for an effective strategy to combat adolescent T2D which investigators will address by demonstrating the benefit of an intervention to reduce added sugars. The objective of the study is to demonstrate whether substituting sparkling water for SSB has benefits for in vivo physiological measures of glycemia while maintaining flavor acceptability to adolescents who are at risk for diabetes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obesity, Adolescent PreDiabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Prospective, before and after, cohort study

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Replacement of SSB with Unsweetened Sparkling Beverage

To encourage participants to substitute sparkling water flavored water for SSB intake, we will provide enough supplies of the drinks to adolescents (and their families) each month. We will also provide iPhones with the TADA app to the adolescent participants. Study staff will remind participants to consume the sparkling water through iMessages sent through the TADA app.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Unsweetened flavored sparkling water

Intervention Type OTHER

Unsweetened sparkling waters are carbonated water with flavoring, completely unsweetened, which are commercially available in soda-like flavors like cola

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Unsweetened flavored sparkling water

Unsweetened sparkling waters are carbonated water with flavoring, completely unsweetened, which are commercially available in soda-like flavors like cola

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female adolescents (age 10-21 years)
* Overweight and Obese (body mass index ≥ 85 percentile for age and sex)
* High consumers of SSB, defined as \>2 or more servings per day
* Family history of diabetes in a first or second degree relative OR prediabetes (i.e., evidence of either impaired glucose tolerance (HbA1c 5.7 - 6.4%, or plasma glucose between 140-199 mg/dL at 2 hours on oral glucose tolerance testing) or impaired fasting plasma glucose (≥ 100 mg/dL))

Exclusion Criteria

* Use of medications that affect glucose metabolism (such as glucocorticoid-containing medications or atypical antipsychotics). We will not exclude female participants who currently use, are planning to use, or planning to stop taking oral contraceptives.
* Syndromic obesity (such as Prader Willi, hypothalamic obesity, or Laurence-Moon-Biedl)

Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No