Evaluation of Tooth Sensitivity After Scaling and Root Planing Treated With Photobiomodulation

NCT ID: NCT05946265

Last Updated: 2024-11-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

112 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-01

Study Completion Date

2024-03-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

One hundred twenty patients with dentin sensibility after non-surgical scaling and root planning (SRP) will be randomly included in 2 groups: Experimental Group: SRP+ Photobiomodulation (PBM) (660nm, 100W, area 0,5cm2, 200w/cm2, 30 seconds, 3 J, 6J/cm2. The study's primary outcome will be the assessment of dentinal sensitivity after 7 days of RAR measured with the visual analog scale (VAS). The cutoff of VAS is 3. The impact of oral health on the participant's quality of life will also be assessed with the OHIP-14 questionnaire. Analgesics (paracetamol) will be prescribed as needed, and the amount of medication will be calculated. These outcomes will be evaluated after 7 days and 1 month of application

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective: To evaluate tooth sensitivity after photobiomodulation in sensitive scaling and root planning treated teeth. Study design: Randomized, controlled, double-blind split-mouth clinical trial. Methods: One hundred twenty patients with dentin sensibility after non-surgical scaling and root planning (SRP) will be randomly included in 2 groups: Experimental Group: SRP+ Photobiomodulation (PBM). The dosimetric parameters for the treatment included a wavelength of 660 nm applied in continuous mode with a radiant power of 100 mW (0.1 W). The irradiance ranged from 35.385 mW/cm² to 35 W/cm², with a beam area of 0.002826 cm². Each point received an exposure time of 30 seconds, resulting in a radiant exposure of 1.061 J/cm² and a total radiant energy of 3 J. The procedure involved six irradiated points per tooth, distributed across the vestibular surface (apical, middle, and cervical regions) and the palatal surface. The application technique was performed in contact, maintaining a 90-degree angle to the surface. The treatment consisted of a single session.The primary outcome of the study will be the assessment of dentinal sensitivity after 7 days of RAR measured with the visual analog scale (VAS). The cutoff of VAS is 3. Also, it will be assessed the impact of oral health on the participant's quality of life, with the OHIP-14 questionnaire. The use of analgesics (paracetamol) will be prescribed as needed and the amount of medication will be calculated. These outcomes will be evaluated after 7 days and 1 month of application. If the data are normal, they will be submitted to the ANOVA test - one way. Data will be presented as means ± SD and the p-value will be set to \< 0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Photobiomodulation Dental Hypersensitivity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Forty-four patients with dentin sensibility after non-surgical scaling and root planning (SRP) will be randomly included in 2 groups: Experimental Group: SRP+ Photobiomodulation (PBM) (660nm, 100W, area 0,5cm2, 200w/cm2, 30 seconds, 3 J, 6J/cm2. The primary outcome of the study will be the assessment of dentinal sensitivity after 7 days of RAR measured with the visual analog scale (VAS). The cutoff of VAS is 3. Also, it will be assessed the impact of oral health on the participant's quality of life, with the OHIP-14 questionnaire. The use of analgesics (paracetamol) will be prescribed as needed and the amount of medication will be calculated. These outcomes will be evaluated after 7 days and 1 month of application.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Immediately after periodontal treatment, the researcher responsible for applying the FBM will remove and open 1 envelope and perform the indicated procedure (FBM or simulation). Only this researcher will know the intervention applied to each patient. All other investigators will be blinded to the intervention.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

Intervention Group - RAR + FBM (n=56): The researcher responsible for FBM will remove the randomization envelope and apply Laser Therapy XP. All dosimetric parameters, details of sessions, and the number of FBM applications are presented in the project.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Photobiomodulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

120 patients with dentin sensibility after non-surgical scaling and root planning (SRP) will be randomly included in 2 groups: Experimental Group: SRP+ Photobiomodulation (PBM) The dosimetric parameters for the treatment included a wavelength of 660 nm applied in continuous mode with a radiant power of 100 mW (0.1 W). The irradiance ranged from 35.385 mW/cm² to 35 W/cm², with a beam area of 0.002826 cm². Each point received an exposure time of 30 seconds, resulting in a radiant exposure of 1.061 J/cm² and a total radiant energy of 3 J. The procedure involved six irradiated points per tooth, distributed across the vestibular surface (apical, middle, and cervical regions) and the palatal surface. The application technique was performed in contact, maintaining a 90-degree angle to the surface. The treatment consisted of a single session.

Control Group

Control Group - RAR + FBM simulation (n=56): Simulation of the use of FBM will be carried out identically to the Experimental group. The person responsible for applying the FBM will simulate irradiation by positioning the devices in the same locations described for the FBM group, however, the laser pointer will be turned off and the sound of the device will be recorded to mimic the use of the equipment and the participant will not identify the group to be used. who belongs. In this trial, we have no criteria for discontinuing or modifying allocated interventions because no harm is expected with this intervention. The study flowchart presents the details of the project

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

simulation of Photobiomodulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Simulation of the use of FBM will be carried out identically to the Experimental group. The person responsible for applying the FBM will simulate irradiation by positioning the devices in the same locations described for the FBM group, however, the laser pointer will be turned off and the sound of the device will be recorded to mimic the use of the equipment and the participant will not identify the group to be used. who belongs. In this trial, we have no criteria for discontinuing or modifying allocated interventions because no harm is expected with this intervention.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Photobiomodulation

120 patients with dentin sensibility after non-surgical scaling and root planning (SRP) will be randomly included in 2 groups: Experimental Group: SRP+ Photobiomodulation (PBM) The dosimetric parameters for the treatment included a wavelength of 660 nm applied in continuous mode with a radiant power of 100 mW (0.1 W). The irradiance ranged from 35.385 mW/cm² to 35 W/cm², with a beam area of 0.002826 cm². Each point received an exposure time of 30 seconds, resulting in a radiant exposure of 1.061 J/cm² and a total radiant energy of 3 J. The procedure involved six irradiated points per tooth, distributed across the vestibular surface (apical, middle, and cervical regions) and the palatal surface. The application technique was performed in contact, maintaining a 90-degree angle to the surface. The treatment consisted of a single session.

Intervention Type DEVICE

simulation of Photobiomodulation

Simulation of the use of FBM will be carried out identically to the Experimental group. The person responsible for applying the FBM will simulate irradiation by positioning the devices in the same locations described for the FBM group, however, the laser pointer will be turned off and the sound of the device will be recorded to mimic the use of the equipment and the participant will not identify the group to be used. who belongs. In this trial, we have no criteria for discontinuing or modifying allocated interventions because no harm is expected with this intervention.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients aged 18 or older,
* diagnosed with periodontitis and experiencing dentin hypersensitivity greater than three on the VAS scale caused by a UNC-15 periodontal probe.
* both male and female patients were included,
* without comorbidities.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients taking medications that affect gingival metabolism (e.g., cyclosporine, phenytoin, nifedipine), inflammation (e.g., corticosteroids, anti-inflammatories), or pain (analgesics/NSAIDs),
* history of photosensitivity
* allergies to any medications used in the study.
* patients who experienced any complications during the study,
* allergic reactions to materials used or to paracetamol®
* Those who took any medication not provided in the study were also excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Nove de Julho

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anna CR Horliana, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Nove de Julho

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anna Carolina R.T. Horliana

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Garcia Olazabal MV, Moya LEP, Cirisola RWC, Bruno LH, Safi FT, Ando-Suguimoto ES, Longo PL, Duran CCG, Bussadori SK, Motta LJ, Fernandes KPS, Mesquita-Ferrari RA, Horliana ACRT. Effect of photobiomodulation on dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized controlled double-blind clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 24;29(1):84. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06149-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39853488 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

dental sensitivity

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pulp Inflammatory Markers and Outcome of Pulpotomy
NCT06960603 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
LED Therapy for Third Molar Surgery
NCT06640439 NOT_YET_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1
Tooth Discoloration Induced by Pulpotomy Materials
NCT04346849 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA