Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Associated With the Conventional Endodontic Treatment: A Clinical and Microbiological Study
NCT ID: NCT03212729
Last Updated: 2017-07-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2015-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Estimate the Effect of aPDT on Root Canal Disinfection
NCT02929927
Effectiveness of Photodynamic Therapy in the Disinfection of Root Canals in Patients With Apical Lesion
NCT05916859
The Effect of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy on the Success of Root Canal Treatment
NCT06634745
Photodynamic Therapy in Endodontic Treatment
NCT02824601
Evaluation of Photodynamic Therapy in Pieces With Presence of Fistula.
NCT06413836
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group
CONVENTIONAL ENDODONTIC TREATMENT
Conventional endodontic treatment
After local anesthesia the supragingival calculus, biofilm and the carious tissues were removed. The access cavity preparation was completed. The crown-down technique was performed using Gates Glidden and Kerr files with an anatomic diameter compatible to the radicular canal, and the irrigation was performed with 5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl solution between each endodontic file. The working length was established 1 mm short of the radiographic apex. Smear layer was removed by rinsing the canal with 17% ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid solution, which was left in the canal for 5 min, followed by a final irrigation with 15 mL of 2.5% NaOCl solution. Calcium hydroxide paste with paramonoclorophenol, was inserted into the canal, filling the root canal as temporary medication between the sessions. The coronal sealing was performed using Coltosol, followed by glass ionomer Maxxion R. Seven days later the root canal was filled by the hybrid Tagger technique, with a Mc Spadden condenser.
Test Group
CONVENTIONAL ENDODONTIC TREATMENT ASSOCIATED WITH ANTIMICROBIAL PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY
ANTIMICROBIAL PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY
The aPDT was performed with 0.01% methylene blue and irradiated with low-level laser therapy (InGaAIP, 660 nm; 100 mW; 40 sec) with an optical fiber-coupled. Another irradiation (3 J; 30 sec; spot size of 3 mm2) was performed in the gingiva close to the apical foramen.
Conventional endodontic treatment
After local anesthesia the supragingival calculus, biofilm and the carious tissues were removed. The access cavity preparation was completed. The crown-down technique was performed using Gates Glidden and Kerr files with an anatomic diameter compatible to the radicular canal, and the irrigation was performed with 5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl solution between each endodontic file. The working length was established 1 mm short of the radiographic apex. Smear layer was removed by rinsing the canal with 17% ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid solution, which was left in the canal for 5 min, followed by a final irrigation with 15 mL of 2.5% NaOCl solution. Calcium hydroxide paste with paramonoclorophenol, was inserted into the canal, filling the root canal as temporary medication between the sessions. The coronal sealing was performed using Coltosol, followed by glass ionomer Maxxion R. Seven days later the root canal was filled by the hybrid Tagger technique, with a Mc Spadden condenser.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ANTIMICROBIAL PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY
The aPDT was performed with 0.01% methylene blue and irradiated with low-level laser therapy (InGaAIP, 660 nm; 100 mW; 40 sec) with an optical fiber-coupled. Another irradiation (3 J; 30 sec; spot size of 3 mm2) was performed in the gingiva close to the apical foramen.
Conventional endodontic treatment
After local anesthesia the supragingival calculus, biofilm and the carious tissues were removed. The access cavity preparation was completed. The crown-down technique was performed using Gates Glidden and Kerr files with an anatomic diameter compatible to the radicular canal, and the irrigation was performed with 5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl solution between each endodontic file. The working length was established 1 mm short of the radiographic apex. Smear layer was removed by rinsing the canal with 17% ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid solution, which was left in the canal for 5 min, followed by a final irrigation with 15 mL of 2.5% NaOCl solution. Calcium hydroxide paste with paramonoclorophenol, was inserted into the canal, filling the root canal as temporary medication between the sessions. The coronal sealing was performed using Coltosol, followed by glass ionomer Maxxion R. Seven days later the root canal was filled by the hybrid Tagger technique, with a Mc Spadden condenser.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients pregnant, lactating, with systemic diseases that could compromise the immune system, individuals who received antibiotic therapy within the previous 3 months or in immunosuppressive treatment.
17 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rio de Janeiro State Research Supporting Foundation (FAPERJ)
OTHER_GOV
Universidade Federal Fluminense
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Natalia Iorio Lopes Pontes Póvoa
Professor
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
aPDT and microorganisms
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.