Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation Using Extubation Advisor Decision Support

NCT ID: NCT05506904

Last Updated: 2025-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-22

Study Completion Date

2025-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Timely and safe extubation in critically ill patients is vitally important as prolonged mechanical ventilation and failed attempts at extubation are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, costs, intensive care unit (ICU) stays, and a risk for aerosolization of COVID-19 to health care providers. A Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) is the current standard of care to assess a patient's readiness for extubation. However, SBTs are performed in various ways and have poor ability to predict successful extubation on their own. There is an urgent need to improve and standardize extubation decision-making. In a prior multicenter study, the investigators showed that decreased respiratory rate variability during SBTs predicted extubation failure better than other predictive indices.

The Extubation Advisor (EA) tool combines clinician's assessments of extubation readiness with predictive analytics and risk mitigation strategies for individual patients. In a single centre observational study, the investigators demonstrated the ability to deliver EA reports to the bedside and acceptability of this decision-support tool to respiratory therapists (RTs) and physicians (MDs).

The investigators will conduct the Liberation from mechanical ventilation using EA Decision Support (LEADS) Pilot Trial to assess feasibility outcomes. They will include critically ill adults who are invasively ventilated for \>48 hours and are ready to undergo an SBT.

Patients in the intervention arm undergo an EA assessment and treating clinicians (RTs, MDs) will receive an EA report for each SBT conducted. The EA report will help to guide extubation decision-making. Patients in the control arm receive standard care. SBTs will be directed by clinicians.

The primary feasibility outcome will reflect the ability to recruit the desired population. The investigators will also assess the usefulness of the tool to MDs and complete an analysis of resource utilization to inform future economic analyses of cost-effectiveness. The investigators aim to recruit 1 to 2 patients/month/center.

The LEADS trial is novel and low-risk. It is the first trial to evaluate use of a bedside decision support tool to assist ICU clinicians with extubation decision-making. The LEADS pilot trial will inform the design of a future, large-scale randomized controlled trial that is expected to enhance the care delivered to critically ill patients, improve extubation outcomes, and inform extubation practice in ICUs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Timely and safe extubation (i.e. endotracheal tube removal) in critically ill patients is vitally important as prolonged mechanical ventilation and failed attempts at extubation (i.e. re-intubation\<48 hrs; 15% incidence) are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, costs, intensive care unit (ICU) stays, and a risk for aerosolization of COVID-19 to health care providers. A Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) is the current standard of care to assess a patient's readiness for extubation. However, SBTs are performed in various ways and have poor ability to predict successful extubation on their own. There is an urgent need to improve and standardize extubation decision-making in the intensive care unit. In a prior multicenter study (n=721), the investigators showed that decreased respiratory rate variability during SBTs predicted extubation failure better than other predictive indices. The Extubation Advisor (EA) tool combines clinician's assessments of extubation readiness with predictive analytics and risk mitigation strategies for individual patients. In a single centre observational study (n=117; 2 ICUs), the investigators demonstrated the ability to deliver EA reports to the bedside and acceptability of this decision-support tool to respiratory therapists (RTs) and physicians (MDs).

Proposed Trial: The investigators will conduct the Liberation from mechanical ventilation using EA Decision Support (LEADS) Pilot Trial to assess feasibility outcomes including recruitment of critically ill patients with and without COVID-19 and protocol adherence.

Patients: The investigators will include critically ill adults who are invasively ventilated for \>48 hours and who are ready to undergo an SBT with a view to extubation.

Intervention: Patients in the intervention arm will undergo an EA assessment and treating clinicians (RTs, MDs) will receive an EA report for each SBT conducted. The EA report will help to guide, rather than direct extubation decision-making by MDs.

Control: Patients in the control arm will receive standard care. SBTs will be directed by clinicians, using current best evidence. No EA assessments will be made, and no EA reports will be generated.

Outcomes: The primary feasibility outcome will reflect the ability to recruit the desired population. Secondary feasibility outcomes will assess rates of (i) consent (for eligible patients approached), (ii) randomization, (iii) intervention adherence, (iv) crossovers (EA to standard care and standard care to EA), and (v) completeness of clinical outcomes collected. The investigators will also assess the usefulness of the tool to MDs and complete an analysis of resource utilization to inform future economic analyses of cost-effectiveness. The investigators aim to recruit 1 to 2 patients/month/center on average. The investigators aim to achieve \>75% consent rate, \>95% randomization rate in consented patients, \>80% of EA reports generated and delivered (intervention arm), \<10% crossovers (both arms), and \>90% of patients with complete clinical outcomes. The investigators will report feasibility outcomes overall and by site.

Impact: The LEADS trial was informed by extensive preparatory work conducted within two parallel programs of research on weaning and extubation. The LEADS trial is novel and low-risk. It is the first trial to evaluate use of a bedside decision support tool to assist ICU clinicians with extubation decision-making. The LEADS pilot trial will inform the design of a future, large-scale randomized controlled trial that is expected to enhance the care delivered to critically ill patients, improve extubation outcomes, and inform extubation practice in ICUs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Airway Extubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Multicentre pragmatic vanguard pilot RCT of the EA tool in invasive ventilated critically ill patients, with and without COVID-19. Individual patients will be randomized (1:1) to intervention (EA tool) or control (standard care).
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Statisticians will be blinded to treatment assignment.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Extubation Advisor

Wave form data from participants' spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) will be analyzed using Extubation Advisor (EA) to generate an EA report that provides clinical decision support regarding extubation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Extubation Advisor

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants undergoing a Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) to assess readiness for extubation will be connected to a portable monitor displaying ECG, capnography, and other waveforms. This monitor will also be connected to a laptop containing the Extubation Advisor (EA) software. During the SBT, relevant patient information will be entered into the EA application and the EA application will record waveform data. When the SBT is complete, the EA application will analyze the waveform and patient data to generate a score summarizing the risk of extubation failure. A report will be generated and provided to the respiratory therapist and attending physician to help determine whether to proceed with extubation or not. The clinical outcome case report form will be completed at the time of hospital discharge.

Standard of Care Arm

Participants will undergo SBTs as directed by clinicians. The EA device will not be used.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Extubation Advisor

Participants undergoing a Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) to assess readiness for extubation will be connected to a portable monitor displaying ECG, capnography, and other waveforms. This monitor will also be connected to a laptop containing the Extubation Advisor (EA) software. During the SBT, relevant patient information will be entered into the EA application and the EA application will record waveform data. When the SBT is complete, the EA application will analyze the waveform and patient data to generate a score summarizing the risk of extubation failure. A report will be generated and provided to the respiratory therapist and attending physician to help determine whether to proceed with extubation or not. The clinical outcome case report form will be completed at the time of hospital discharge.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* With or without COVID-19
* In the intensive care unit (ICU)
* Able to provide informed consent (through a surrogate)
* Critically ill adults (age≥18)
* Anticipated to need invasive ventilation for \>48 hours prior to an initial SBT
* Ready to undergo an initial SBT within the next 24 hours with a view to extubation as per treating MDs. As per the FAST trial, an SBT will be defined as a focused assessment on low ventilator settings \[T-piece, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or PS \< 8 cm H2O regardless of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)\]

Exclusion Criteria

* Suffer from known or suspected peripheral severe myopathy or neuropathy, or limb weakness or paralysis or central (e.g., post arrest, large intracranial stroke or bleed) injury or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) \< 6
* Do not wish to be re-intubated as part of their treatment goals
* Were previously extubated during the same ICU admission
* Have undergone 1 or more SBTs
* Already have a tracheostomy
* Are moribund or expected to die.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karen Burns, MD PhD FRCSC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Unity Health Toronto - St. Michael's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Alexandra Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

St. Boniface Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Health Sciences Centre Winnipeg

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Kingston Health Sciences Centre

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

The Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Queensway Carleton Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Unity Health Toronto - St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Hotel Dieu de Levis

Lévis, Quebec, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Hopital de l'Enfant Jesus

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec

Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Andrew JE Seely, MD PhD FRCSC

Role: CONTACT

613-737-8899 ext. 74052

Karen Burns, MD MSc FRCPC

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Demetrios J Kutsogiannis, MD MHS FRCPC

Role: primary

Owen Mooney, MD FRCPC

Role: primary

Asher Mendelson, MD PhD FRCPC

Role: primary

David Maslove, MD MS FRCPC

Role: primary

Andrew JE Seely, MD PhD FRCSC

Role: primary

613-737-8899 ext. 75052

Akshai M Iyengar, MSc MD FRCPC

Role: primary

Damon Scales, MD PhD FRCPC

Role: primary

Karen Burns, MD MSc FRCPC

Role: primary

Patrick Archambault, MD FRCPC

Role: primary

Emmanuel Charbonney, MD PhD

Role: primary

Alexis F Turgeon, MD, MSc, FRCPC

Role: primary

Francois Lellouche, MD PhD FRCPC

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Burns KEA, Allan JE, Lee E, Santos-Taylor M, Kay P, Greco P, Every H, Mooney O, Tanios M, Tan E, Herry CL, Scales NB, Gouskos A, Tran A, Iyengar A, Maslove DM, Kutsogiannis J, Charbonney E, Mendelson A, Lellouche F, Lamontagne F, Scales D, Archambault P, Turgeon AF, Seely AJE, Group CCCT. Liberation from mechanical ventilation using Extubation Advisor Decision Support (LEADS): protocol for a multicentre pilot trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 18;15(3):e093853. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093853.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40107679 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EA-LEADS-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.